On the basis of 572 examples taken from seven million-word corpora of written English the present study—which complements the spoken data-based studies of Oberlander & Delin (1996) and Weinert & Miller (1996)— explores the relationship between information structure and discourse role with reversed what-dzfts. The study confirms the typically summative, internal-referencing, and stage-ending-roles of the informational type upon which previous studies have concentrated (the statistically dominant type, with minimally informative highlighted element and relative clause). A second type observed by Oberlander & Delin (1996), with an ‘informative presupposition’ or ‘comment clause’, is found to occur stage-medially rather than as an ending, and furthermore to have a ‘pivotal’ (both backward-and forward-looking) discourse role. Two further types of reversed what-cleft with an informationally new highlighted element are identified. Both can occur stage-initially, and share some similarities with basic what-clefts and it-clefts in their discourse behaviour.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Collins, P. (1991). Cleft and pseudocleft constructions in English. London: Routledge.
Collins, P. (2004). The information structure of what-clefts in English. In G. Knowles, J. Mohd Ali, J. Mohd Jan, S. Awab & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.) Language, linguistics and the real world. Volume 1: Making linguistics relevant (pp. 227–244). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
Declerck, R. (1984). The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua, 641, 251–89.
Declerck, R. (1988). Studies on copular sentences, clefts, and pseudo-clefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press/Foris Publications.
Delin, J. & Oberlander, J. (1995). Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: the case of it-clefts. Linguistics, 331, 465–500.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johansson, M. (2001). Clefts in contrast: a contrastive study of it clefts and wh clefts in English and Swedish texts and translations. Linguistics, 391, 547–82.
Jucker, A. (1997). The relevance of cleft constructions. Multilingua, 161, 187–98.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.