The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction
Fethi Mansouri | Deakin University
Loretta Duffy | Deakin University
The project reported in this paper aims to test the concept of learner developmental readiness’ and its pedagogic effectiveness in the teaching of foreign language grammar. It focuses on the teaching of English as a second language (ESL) in a formal classroom context. The aim is to ascertain whether a specific teaching order based on the concept of developmental readiness, can enhance learning outcomes in foreign language classrooms. The main theoretical approach used is the Teachability Hypothesis articulated in Pienemann’s (1998) Processability Theory (PT), which “predicts that stages of acquisition cannot be skipped through formal instruction and that instruction will be beneficial if it focuses on structures from ‘the next stage’” (Pienemann, 1998, p. 13). Past teachability studies (e.g. Boss, 1996; Dyson, 1996; Ellis, 1989; Pienemann, 1984; Spada& Lightbown, 1999) have employed predicted order testing. However in this study subjects were exposed to English syntax structures either in the predicted or in the reversed orders outlined under PT. The findings of this study show that learners exposed to instruction in accordance with the developmental order predicted in PT produce the target language (TL) structures with a higher grammatical accuracy than those exposed to the reversed order. This suggests that instruction is more beneficial, in relation to grammatical accuracy, when it focuses on the TL structures in a developmentally implicational manner.
Published online: 01 January 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.28.1.06man
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.28.1.06man
References
References
Boss, B.
(1996) German grammar for beginners – the teachability hypothesis and its relevance to the classroom. In C. Arbones Sola, J. Rolin-Ianziti & R. Sussex (Eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on “Who’s afraid of teaching grammar?”; Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 1 (pp. 93–103). Brisbane: Centre for Language Teaching and Research, University of Queensland.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dyson, B.
(1996) The debate on form-focussed instruction: a teacher’s perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19 (2), 59–78. 
Ellis, R.
(1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 303–28.
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnston, M.
(1995) Stages of the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 4, 1–35.
Kempen, G. & Hoenkamp, E.
(1987) An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.
Kramsch, C.
(2000) Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (3), 311–326.
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: from interaction to articulation. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
Lightbown, P.M.
(1985) Great expectations: second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6 (2), 173–89.
(2000) Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21 (4), 431–462.
Long, M. & Robinson, R.
(1998) Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macroy, G.
(2000) Learning to teach grammar in the modern foreign languages classroom. Research in Education, 64, 1–11.
Mansouri, F.
(1999) Interlanguage syntax in Arabic as a second language: a processability theory approach. Languages and Linguistics, 4, 45–72.
(2000) Grammatical markedness and information processing in the acquisition of Arabic as a second language. Munchen (Germany): Lincom Europa Academic Publishers.
Mitchell, R.
(2000) Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice: the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 281–303.
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (2), 186–214.
(1995) Second language acquisition: a first introduction. University of Western Sydney: National Language & Literacy Institute of Australia.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: processability theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Salameh, E.K., Hakansson, G. & Nettelbladt, U.
(1996) The acquisition of Swedish as a second language in a group of Arabic-speaking pre-school children: word order patterns and phrasal morphology. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 21 (3–4), 163–170.
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M.
(1999) Instruction, first language influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Languages Journal, 83 (1), 1–22.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2017.
In Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4],
Baten, Kristof, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman & Mieke Van Herreweghe
2015.
In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4],
► pp. 1 ff.
Baten, Kristof & Saartje Verbeke
2015.
In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4],
► pp. 71 ff.
Doman, Evelyn
2015.
In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4],
► pp. 239 ff.
Dyson, Bronwen
2018.
In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,
► pp. 1 ff.
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
2010. Learner language analytic methods and pedagogical implications.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 30.1 ff.
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
2010. Learner language analytic methods and pedagogical implications.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 30.1 ff.
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
2019.
In Teachability and Learnability across Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 6],
► pp. 71 ff.
Flyman Mattsson, Anna
2019.
In Teachability and Learnability across Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 6],
► pp. 51 ff.
Hua, Tzu-Ling
2019. Textbooks for teaching and learning a foreign English language: Do they really facilitate students’ acquisition of English relative clauses?.
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 8:2
Pienemann, Manfred, Jörg-U. Keßler & Yuki Itani-Adams
2011. Comparing levels of processability across languages.
International Journal of Bilingualism 15:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Roos, Jana
2016.
In Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 5],
► pp. 121 ff.
Roos, Jana
2019.
In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7],
► pp. 285 ff.
Tang, Xiaofei
2019. Learnability of Grammatical Sequencing: A Processability Perspective of Textbook Evaluation in EFL Settings.
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 236 ff.
Zhang, Xian & James P. Lantolf
2015. Natural or Artificial: Is the Route of L2 Development Teachable?.
Language Learning 65:1 ► pp. 152 ff.
Zhang, Yanyin
2020. The impact of learning context on L2 Chinese word order structure development.
Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:2 ► pp. 258 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.