Review published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 30:1 (2007) ► pp.11.111.4
References
Belz, J. A.
2001 ‘Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching’. ReCALL 13 (2): 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. A; Müller-Hartmann, A.
2003 ‘Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional faultline’. The Modern Language Journal 87 (1): 71–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byram, M.
1997Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon; Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Donath, J.
1999 ‘Identity and deception in the virtual community’. In Communities in cyberspace, edited by Smith, M.A.; Kollock, P. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kern, R; Ware, P; Warschauer, M.
2004 ‘Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 241: 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C.; Thorne, S.
2002 ‘Foreign language learning as global communicative practice’. In Globalization and language teaching, edited by Block, D.; Cameron, D. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C.; Lengel, L.; Tomic, A.
2004 ‘Online identity: Real or virtual? In Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ware, P.
2005 ‘“Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration’. Language Learning & Technology 9 (2): 64–89. Accessed 1 October 2006. Available from: [URL]