Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 31:1 (2008) ► pp.6.1–6.22

Applied Linguistics in “dialogue” with hermeneutics in discoursing “the intercultural” in educational praxis

| University of South Australia
Ever since the Socratic-Platonic inquiry on the nature of language, linguistic and socio-cultural thinking in Eurocentric academic cultures about human communication has been discoursed from various philosophical perspectives based on diverse conceptualisations, perceptions, understandings, notions, theories, descriptions and explanations of the variable phenomena observed in intra- and intercultural interaction and communication. In the variable research areas of applied linguistics ‘scholars from a variety of disciplines have applied themselves to defining what the nature of intercultural communication might be and how it might be taught’ (Kramsch, 2002, p. 277). However, in the concerted effort to apply our understanding of “the intercultural” in our research and educational praxis, we ‘have no other recourse but discourse itself – the discourse of [our] discipline, laid out on the page as disciplinary truth. And that, as James Clifford (Clifford, 1988) would say, is the “predicament of culture”’ (Kramsch, 2002, p. 282). In the following essay, this “predicament” is examined in the contexts of the discourse tradition which centres on “dialogue” as a valued means of understanding self-and-other intra-and-inter-culturally. Discussion will focus on how “dialogue” can impose “situated/positioned” ways of interpreting and understanding “the intercultural” in languages education, especially when it defers engaging with variable-linguisticality and variable-traditionality in its discourse tradition.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0806
References (39)
Alred, G.; Byram, M.; Fleming, M. (Eds.). (2003). Intercultural experience and education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. (trans. Liapunov, V.). Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bredella, L. (2003). What does it mean to be intercultural. In Alred, G.; Byram, M.; Fleming, M. (Eds.). Intercultural experience and education. (pp. 225–239). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.J. (1997). Oriental enlightenment: The encounter between Asian and Western thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cleary, T. (2000). The Taoist I Ching. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collinson, D.; Plant, K.; Wilkinson, R. (2000). Fifty Eastern thinkers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crichton, J.; Paige, M.; Papademetre, L.; Scarino, A. (2004). Integrated resources for intercultural teaching and learning in the context of internationalisation in higher education. Adelaide: University of South Australia, Research Centre for Languages and Cultures Education.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F. (1996). Beyond orientalism: Essays on cross-cultural encounter. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward Ltd.Google Scholar
(1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. (trans. D.E. Linge). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Truth and method. 2nd revised edn. (trans. Weinsheimer, J., Marshall, D.G.). New York: Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(1983). Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geldard, R. G. (2000). Remembering Heraclitus. New York: Lindisfarne Books.Google Scholar
Greenholz, J. (2003). Socratic teachers and Confucian learners. Language and intercultural communication, 3 (2), 122–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondin, J. (1994). Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. (trans. J. Weinsheimer). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Halbfass, W. (1988). India and Europe: An essay in understanding. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1995). The applied linguist and the foreign language teacher: Can they talk to each other. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 10–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). In search of the intercultural. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 (2), 275–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuwayama, T. (2004). Native anthropology: The Japanese challenge to Western academic hegemony. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Lange, D.L.; Paige, R.M. (Eds.). (2003). Culture as the core: Perspectives on culture in second language learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A.; Papademetre, L.; Scarino, A.; Kohler, M. (2003). Report of intercultural language learning. Canberra: DEST.Google Scholar
Papademetre, L, (2003). Intercultural knowing and enacting that knowing in languages-cultures education. Paper presented at the ALAA-2003 Congress, Brisbane.
Papademetre, L. (2005). Intra-cultural considerations for intercultural teacher education. Australian Language & Literacy Matters, 2 (1), 5–10, 30.Google Scholar
Ren Jiyu (1993). The Book of Lao Zi. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A.; Starosta, W.J. (2001). Hans-Georg Gadamer, language, and intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1 (1), 6–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarino, A.; Crichton, J.; Papademetre, L. (2006a). Assessing and evaluating intercultural teaching and learning: A focus on sites of intercultural interaction. University of South Australia: Research Centre for Languages an Cultures Education.Google Scholar
(2006b). A framework for quality assurance in the development and delivery of offshore programmes in languages other than English. Observatory of Borderless Higher Education, UK.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1997). Errata: An examined life. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, R.; Wong Scollon, S. (2000). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, F.M. (1990). Interkulturelle Philosophie. Theorie und Geschichte. Wien: Passagen.Google Scholar
(1993). Ansätze einer interkulturellen Philosophie. In Kimmerle, H., Mall, R.A. (Eds.). Philosophische Grundlagen der Interkulturalität. (pp. 29–40). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
(1996). Is intercultural philosophy a new branch of a new orientation in philosophy? In D’Souza, G. (Ed.), Interculturality of philosophy and religion. (pp. 45–57). Bangalore: National Biblical Centre.Google Scholar
Wimmer, F. (1998). Identität und Kulturbrüche. In Schneider, N., Mall, R.A., Lohmar, D. (Eds.). Studies in intercultural philosophy: Einheit und Vielfalt. (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
Yao, X. (1996). Confucianism and Christianity. Brighton: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zhang Longzi. (1992). The Tao and the logos: Literary hermeneutics, East and West. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Scarino, Angela
2014. Learning as Reciprocal, Interpretive Meaning‐Making: A View From Collaborative Research Into the Professional Learning of Teachers of Languages. The Modern Language Journal 98:1 ► pp. 386 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.