Article published in:
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 27.127.24
Abrams, Zsuzsanna Ittzes
(2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aldosari, Ali; Storch, Neomy
(2006, July). Investigating pair work: The role of L1 in social relations across proficiency levels. Paper presented at the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia conference, Brisbane, Australia.
Beauvois, Margaret Healy
(1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Robert
(2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 41, 120–136.Google Scholar
Donato, Richard
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Firth, Alan; Wagner, Johannes
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research. Modern Language Journal, 911, 755–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, Susan; Varonis, Evangeline
(1986) Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: conversations in SLA (pp. 327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ives, Debra
(2004) Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs. A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters. 1(4), 11–16.Google Scholar
Kelm, Orlando
(1992) The use of synchronous and computer-networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitade, Keiko
(2000) Learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, James
(2000) Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, James; Thorne, Steven
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Michael
(1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, Michael; Porter, Patricia A.
(1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, Alison
(1999) Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, Amy
(2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, Theresa; Holliday, Lloyd; Lewis, Nora; Berducci, Dom; Newman, Jeanne
(1991) Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 131, 343–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roed, Jannie
(2003) Language and learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2–3), 155–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Richard
(1993) Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 131, 206–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, Neomy
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Pat; U. Alice
(2007) Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Merrill
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill; Lapkin, Sharon
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev
(1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warschauer, Mark
(1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Yoshinori
(2004) Collaborative dialogue between ESL learners of different proficiency levels: Linguistic and affective outcomes. Unpublished Master thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, Gillian; Storch, Neomy
(2009) Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing. 26(3), 445–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Tianwei
(2002) Using Internet relay chat in teaching Chinese. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 513–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar


Pair interactions and mode of communication
Cited by

Cited by 36 other publications

Andrews, Jessica J., Deirdre Kerr, Robert J. Mislevy, Alina von Davier, Jiangang Hao & Lei Liu
2017. Modeling Collaborative Interaction Patterns in a Simulation-Based Task. Journal of Educational Measurement 54:1  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Aw-Yong, Jennifer, Neil Anderson & Philemon Chigeza
2013.  In 2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM),  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane, María del Pilar García Mayo & Rhonda Oliver
2020. The effect of task repetition on the patterns of interaction of ESL children. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:1  pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Marta Kopinska
2020. Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System 94  pp. 102338 ff. Crossref logo
Butler, Yuko Goto & Wei Zeng
2014. Young Foreign Language Learners’ Interactions During Task-Based Paired Assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly 11:1  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Butler, Yuko Goto & Wei Zeng
2015. Young learners’ interactional development in task-based paired-assessment in their first and foreign languages: a case of English learners in China. Education 3-13 43:3  pp. 292 ff. Crossref logo
Chaudhuri, Tushar, Renia Lopez-Ozieblo & Valérie Martinez
2022.  In Integrated Language Learning & Social Awareness: Research and Practice [SpringerBriefs in Education, ],  pp. 43 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Wenxue
2016. The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal  pp. ccw075 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Wenxue
2020. Disagreement in peer interaction: Its effect on learner task performance. System 88  pp. 102179 ff. Crossref logo
Cho, Hyeyoon
2017. Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 36  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
2021. Learners’ Engagement in L2 Computer‐Mediated Interaction: Chat Mode, Interlocutor Familiarity, and Text Quality. The Modern Language Journal 105:4  pp. 767 ff. Crossref logo
Edstrom, Anne
2015. Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns and engagement during a collaborative task. System 52  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
Elabdali, Rima & Nike Arnold
2020. Group Dynamics across Interaction Modes in L2 Collaborative Wiki Writing. Computers and Composition 58  pp. 102607 ff. Crossref logo
García Mayo, Maria del Pilar & Ainara Imaz Agirre
2016. Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal 44:4  pp. 451 ff. Crossref logo
Hirci, Nataša & Agnes Pisanski Peterlin
2020. Face-to-face andWikirevision in translator training: exploring the advantages of two modes of collaboration. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 14:1  pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
Hsu, Hsiu-Chen
2020. The impact of task complexity on patterns of interaction during web-based asynchronous collaborative writing tasks. System 93  pp. 102328 ff. Crossref logo
Jiang, Dayu, Slava Kalyuga & John Sweller
2021. Comparing face-to-face and computer-mediated collaboration when teaching EFL writing skills. Educational Psychology 41:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Johnston, Kris Pierre & Geoff Lawrence
2018.  In Applications of CALL Theory in ESL and EFL Environments [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Johnston, Kris Pierre & Geoff Lawrence
2021.  In Research Anthology on Developing Effective Online Learning Courses,  pp. 304 ff. Crossref logo
Kato, Yoshitaka & David Dalsky
2019.  In A Systems Approach to Language Pedagogy [Translational Systems Sciences, 17],  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Agurtzane Azkarai
2019. Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:1  pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4  pp. 513 ff. Crossref logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
2021. Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2  pp. 189 ff. Crossref logo
Rouhshad, Amir & Neomy Storch
2016.  In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45],  pp. 267 ff. Crossref logo
Stiefenhöfer, Laura & Marije C. Michel
2020.  In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56],  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy
2011. Collaborative Writing in L2 Contexts: Processes, Outcomes, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy
2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy
2018.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy
2019.  In Feedback in Second Language Writing,  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Walls, Laura C.
2018. The effect of dyad type on collaboration: Interactions among heritage and second language learners. Foreign Language Annals 51:3  pp. 638 ff. Crossref logo
Wigglesworth, Gillian & Neomy Storch
2012. What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 21:4  pp. 364 ff. Crossref logo
Zohreh Zafarani & Parviz Maftoon
2016. Investigating Dynamic Writing Assessment in a Web 2.0 Asynchronous Collaborative Computer-Mediated Context. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 19:2  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo
Zhai, Mengying
2020. Peer-interaction patterns in a Chinese as a foreign language pair writing task. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 55:2  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Zhai, Mengying
2021. Collaborative writing in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom: Learners’ perceptions and motivations. Journal of Second Language Writing 53  pp. 100836 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Meixiu
2019. Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 45  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Meixiu & Luke Plonsky
2020. Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing 49  pp. 100753 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.