Article published in:
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 27.127.24

Full-text

Pair interactions and mode of communication
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kim, Youn-hee
2020. Willingness to engage: the importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness 29:2  pp. 134 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abrams, Zsuzsanna Ittzes
(2003) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aldosari, Ali; Storch, Neomy
(2006, July). Investigating pair work: The role of L1 in social relations across proficiency levels. Paper presented at the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia conference, Brisbane, Australia.
Beauvois, Margaret Healy
(1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Robert
(2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120–136.Google Scholar
Donato, Richard
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Firth, Alan; Wagner, Johannes
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research. Modern Language Journal, 91, 755–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, Susan; Varonis, Evangeline
(1986) Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: conversations in SLA (pp. 327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ives, Debra
(2004) Three NS-NNS upper primary school pairs. A case study. Australian Language & Literacy Matters. 1(4), 11–16.Google Scholar
Kelm, Orlando
(1992) The use of synchronous and computer-networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitade, Keiko
(2000) Learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, James
(2000) Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, James; Thorne, Steven
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Michael
(1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, Michael; Porter, Patricia A.
(1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, Alison
(1999) Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, Amy
(2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pica, Theresa; Holliday, Lloyd; Lewis, Nora; Berducci, Dom; Newman, Jeanne
(1991) Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roed, Jannie
(2003) Language and learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2–3), 155–172.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard
(1993) Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 206–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, Neomy
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Pat; U. Alice
(2007) Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Merrill
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill; Lapkin, Sharon
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev
(1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warschauer, Mark
(1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Yoshinori
(2004) Collaborative dialogue between ESL learners of different proficiency levels: Linguistic and affective outcomes. Unpublished Master thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, Gillian; Storch, Neomy
(2009) Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing. 26(3), 445–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Tianwei
(2002) Using Internet relay chat in teaching Chinese. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 513–524.Google Scholar