Article published In:
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 29.129.17
Bardovi–Harlig, Kathleen
(1995) The interaction of pedagogy and natural sequences in the acquisition of tense and aspect. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham and R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 151–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beck, Maria–Luise
(1997) Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: Tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences. Second Language Research, 131, 93–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berko, Jean
(1958) The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 141, 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bettoni, Camilla; Di Biase, Bruno
Forthcoming). Processability Thoery and its theoretical bases. To appear in B. Di Biase and C. Bettoni Eds. Processability Theory: Current issues in theory and application Amsterdam John Benjamins
Carroll, John
(1967) Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annals, 11, 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Graaff, Rick; Housen, Alex
(2009) Investigating effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–753). Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Robert
(2007) Skill acquisition theory. In B. van Pattern and J. Williams (Eds.). Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–14). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod
(1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 111, 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Roger; Liszka, Sarah
(2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken and R. Towell (Eds.), The Lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth; Abrahamsson, Niclas
(2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Louise
(2008) Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross–sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning, 581, 185–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Gisela; Fuse, Akiko
(2007) Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin–speaking children and adolescents: Age–related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 501, 1280–1299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
(1997) “A” stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 811, 307–312.Google Scholar
Kessler, Jeorg
(Ed.) (2008) Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen; Long, Michael; Scarcella, Roger
(1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 131, 573–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, Donna
(1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end–state grammar. Second Language Research, 141, 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp.102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony
(1997) Interaction, social structure, and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 811, 313–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, Fethi
(Ed.) (2007) Second language research theory–construction and testing. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Charles
(1971) The relevance of intensive training in English as a foreign language for university students. Language Learning, 211, 197–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes
(2009) Sequences and processes in language learning. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.). The handbook of language teaching (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, Gabriele
(2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 281, 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred
(1987) Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 146–168). New Book: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2005) An introduction to Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross–linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). Amsterdam John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, Charlene
(1990) The syntax of conversation in interlanguage development. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard
(1983) Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff
(2003) Social context. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 179–223). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Upshur, John
(1968) Four experiments on the relation between foreign language teaching and learning. Language Learning, 181, 111–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yanyin
(2003) A note on the accuracy criterion and the emergence criterion. Chinese Teaching in the World [in Chinese], 65 (3), 52–60.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yanyin; Liu, Bo; Bower, Eileen
in preparation). Nature or nurture? Past tense marking by advanced Chinese speakers of L2 English.
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Eguchi, Akiko & Masatoshi Sugiura
2015. Applicability of processability theory to Japanese adolescent EFL learners: A case study of early L2 syntactic and morphological development. System 52  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2021. Tense in Speakers of English as a Contact Language: World Englishes and First Generation Long-immersed Immigrants. English Studies 102:5  pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Mohamed Salleh, Rabiah Tul Adawiyah, Bruno Di Biase & Satomi Kawaguchi
2023. Chapter 7. The bilingual development of plural marking in a Malay-English child. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9],  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Salleh, Rabiah Tul Adawiyah Mohamed, Bruno Di Biase & Satomi Kawaguchi
2021. Lexical and morphological development: A case study of Malay English bilingual first language acquisition. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4  pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Pfenninger, Simone E.
2014. Quadrilingual advantages:do-support in bilingual vs. multilingual learners. International Journal of Multilingualism 11:2  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
2017. The present perfect in Nigerian English. English Language and Linguistics 21:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Yamaguchi, Yumiko & Hiroko Usami
2023. Chapter 11. Testing the validity of Processability Theory through a corpus-based analysis. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9],  pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yanyin & Ima Widyastuti
2020. Eight Months Later: A Family Case Study of L2 Acquisition of English Morphology. Tamansiswa International Journal in Education and Science 1:2  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
박채희 & 이영화
2017. Korean EFL Learners’ Development of Inflectional Morphemes. Studies in Linguistics null:43  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.