Article published in:
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 29.1–29.17

Acquisition of L2 English morphology

A Family case study

| University of Canberra
| University of Canberra
This study investigates the status of morphology in the L2 English of three members of a family from Indonesia (parents and their 5-year-old daughter) who have lived, studied or worked in Australia for a year. The investigation is contextualized against various learning settings in which the informants have learned English: formal instruction in the foreign language environment, naturalistic learning in the target language setting, and a mixture of formal and naturalistic learning in the target language environment. Following the developmental hierarchy for English morphology (Pienemann, 2005; Bettoni and Di Biase, forthcoming) and analytical procedures in Processability Theory (Pienemann, 1998, 2005), we found the informants were at different stages of L2 English morphology, with the father being the most advanced and the daughter the least. We also found a systematic developmental profile of each informant in line with the developmental hierarchy for English morphology. Both findings are discussed with reference to the developmental sequences and the role of learning settings in SLA.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 01 January 2010
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1029

Full-text

Acquisition of L2 English morphology
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4], Crossref logo
Eguchi, Akiko & Masatoshi Sugiura
2015. Applicability of processability theory to Japanese adolescent EFL learners: A case study of early L2 syntactic and morphological development. System 52 ► pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. Crossref logo
Pfenninger, Simone E.
2014. Quadrilingual advantages:do-support in bilingual vs. multilingual learners. International Journal of Multilingualism 11:2 ► pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
WERNER, VALENTIN & ROBERT FUCHS
2017. The present perfect in Nigerian English. English Language and Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
박채희 & 이영화
2017. Korean EFL Learners’ Development of Inflectional Morphemes. Studies in Linguistics null:43 ► pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bardovi–Harlig, Kathleen
(1995) The interaction of pedagogy and natural sequences in the acquisition of tense and aspect. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham and R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 151–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beck, Maria–Luise
(1997) Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: Tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences. Second Language Research, 13, 93–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berko, Jean
(1958) The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bettoni, Camilla; Di Biase, Bruno
Forthcoming). Processability Thoery and its theoretical bases. To appear in B. Di Biase and C. Bettoni Eds. Processability Theory: Current issues in theory and application Amsterdam John Benjamins
Carroll, John
(1967) Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annals, 1, 131–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Graaff, Rick; Housen, Alex
(2009) Investigating effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–753). Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Robert
(2007) Skill acquisition theory. In B. van Pattern and J. Williams (Eds.). Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–14). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod
(1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Roger; Liszka, Sarah
(2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken and R. Towell (Eds.), The Lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth; Abrahamsson, Niclas
(2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Louise
(2008) Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross–sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning, 58, 185–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jia, Gisela; Fuse, Akiko
(2007) Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin–speaking children and adolescents: Age–related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1280–1299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
(1997) “A” stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 307–312.Google Scholar
Kessler, Jeorg
(Ed.) (2008) Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen; Long, Michael; Scarcella, Roger
(1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, Donna
(1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end–state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp.102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony
(1997) Interaction, social structure, and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 313–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, Fethi
(Ed.) (2007) Second language research theory–construction and testing. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Charles
(1971) The relevance of intensive training in English as a foreign language for university students. Language Learning, 21, 197–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes
(2009) Sequences and processes in language learning. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.). The handbook of language teaching (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, Gabriele
(2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred
(1987) Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 146–168). New Book: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) An introduction to Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross–linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). Amsterdam John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Charlene
(1990) The syntax of conversation in interlanguage development. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard
(1983) Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff
(2003) Social context. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 179–223). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upshur, John
(1968) Four experiments on the relation between foreign language teaching and learning. Language Learning, 18, 111–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yanyin
(2003) A note on the accuracy criterion and the emergence criterion. Chinese Teaching in the World [in Chinese], 65 (3), 52–60.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yanyin; Liu, Bo; Bower, Eileen
in preparation). Nature or nurture? Past tense marking by advanced Chinese speakers of L2 English.