Cover not available
Article published In:
Sociocognitive Approaches to Second Language Pedagogy
Edited by Bronwen Patricia Dyson
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 33:3] 2010
► pp. 30.1–30.21

Learner language analytic methods and pedagogical implications

| University of Sydney

Methods for analysing interlanguage have long aimed to capture learner language in its own right. By surveying the cognitive methods of Error Analysis, Obligatory Occasion Analysis and Frequency Analysis, this paper traces reformulations to attain this goal. The paper then focuses on Emergence Analysis, which fine-tunes learner language analysis by measuring the ‘onset’ of spoken grammar as hypothesised in Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann, 1998, 2005a). Since doubts have been expressed regarding the emergence approach’s rigour and pedagogical relevance, a study is presented which aims to provide a more in-depth and wide-ranging account of the ‘onset’ of. English grammar. Having sketched and amplified Processability Theory’s predictions, the paper applies emergence analysis to the longitudinal development of two adolescent ESL learners. As well as exemplifying the rigour of the emergence procedures, the results show overall support for the more comprehensive predictions. The paper concludes that learner language analysis does not have a deficit emphasis on transition to the target language, as claimed by Firth and Wagner (1997, 2007). Indeed, such methods have a role in assessing developmental readiness in a learner-oriented approach to grammar teaching.

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1030
References
Bley-Vroman, Robert
(1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 331, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corder, S.
(1967) The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 51, 161–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, Bruno
(2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Kessler, (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 197–220). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidi; Burt, Marina
(1973) Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 231, 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Bronwen
(2004) Developmental style in second language processing: A study of inter-learner variation in the acquisition of English as a Second Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
(2008) What we learn from questions: ESL question development and its implications for language assessment, Prospect, 23(1), 16–27.Google Scholar
(2009a) Processability Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25(3), 355–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Understanding trajectories of academic literacy: How could this improve diagnostic assessment. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(1), 52–69.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod; Barkuizen, Gary
(2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Yehud
a(2008) Functional relations in the English auxiliary system. Linguistics, 46(5), 861–889. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, A; Wagner, J
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 811, 285–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, Alan; Wagner, Johannes
(2007) Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 911, 800–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Thom
(1993) Nothing does not equal zero: Problems with applying development sequence findings to assessment and pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 151, 461–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawaguchi, Satomi
(2005) Argument structure and syntactic developments in Japanese as a second language. In M. Pienemann, (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 254–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang; Purdue, Clive
(1992) Utterance structure: developing grammars again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafford, Barbara
(2007) Second Language Acquisition reconceptualized?:The impact of Firth and Wagner (1997 Modern Language Journal, 911, 735–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, Patsy
(1998) The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, (pp. 177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansouri, Fethi
(2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann. (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 117–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, Fethi; Duffy, Loretta
(2005) The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jurgen; Clahsen, Harald; Pienemann, Manfred
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza; Pekarek-Doehler, Simona
(2004) Second Language Acquisition as situated practice: task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, Teresa
(2000) Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 16(4), 255–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, Gabrielle
(2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (2), 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 11, 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2005a) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005b) An introduction to Processability Theory. In Pienemann, Manfred. (Ed.). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred; Di Biase, Bruno; Kawaguchi, Satomi
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann. (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred; Johnston, Malcolm; Brindley, Geoff
(1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 101, 217–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarone, Elaine; Liu, Guo-Qiang
(1995) Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition theory. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer, (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 107–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Yumiko
(2009) The development of plural marking and Phrasal plural in child English L2 acquisition. In J. Kessler and D. Keatinge, (Eds.). Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 9–40). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yanyin
(2004) Processing constraints, categorial analysis, and the second language acquisition of the Chinese adjective suffix –de (ADJ. Language Learning, 541, 437–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Buyl, Aafke
2015. Chapter 7. Studying Receptive Grammar Acquisition within a PT Framework. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Buyl, Aafke
2019. Chapter 4. Is morpho-syntactic decoding governed by Processability Theory?. In Widening Contexts for Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 7], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Dyson, Bronwen
2018. Developmental Sequences. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dyson, Bronwen
2023. SLA as complex, dynamical and predictable: A Processability Theory perspective. Second Language Research 39:4 ► pp. 1279 ff. DOI logo
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
2016. Variation, individual differences and second language processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:4 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
He, Qiaoling & Isabel Oltra-Massuet
2023. Implicit Knowledge Acquisition and Potential Challenges for Advanced Chinese and Spanish EFL Learners: A Word Monitoring Test on English Questions. Behavioral Sciences 13:2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Yamaguchi, Yumiko
2013. The Acquisition of Complex Structures: The Case of Child ESL. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 03:03 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Dynamic Variation in Second Language Acquisition [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 8], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.