Book review
Review of Mullan, K. (2010) Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse: A Semantic and Interactional Analysis
Reviewed by
Erin Moore | School of Languages and Linguistics, University of Melbourne
References (5)
Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. (1993). Prosodic and functional units of language. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert, (Eds.), Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 33–43). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, K. (2006). Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: the functional polysemy of discourse particles. In K. Fischer, (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (1st ed.) (pp. 427–448). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kärkkäinen, E. (1982). Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland Pub. Co./Elsevier Science/John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)