Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 35:2 (2012) ► pp.203–214

Social identity and sound change

The case of WO in Shanghainese

| Deakin University, Victoria, Australia

Research has shown that language change is driven on one hand by forces internal to language itself such as grammar-internal systematic pressure, and on the other hand by social motives such as social identity. Language contact presents new features, but why is it that some of them are incorporated as variation and evolving into language change, while others are not? This paper reports a study on a sound change in Shanghainese, a dialect of the Chinese language. Data were collected in natural contexts of conversation followed by a brief interview with informants to gain identity related information about them. It has found that previously negative perception of status attached to a new sound induced by language/dialect contact changed into a positive perception, and people started to identify positively with this new sound. Further, there were differences in various different age and gender groups in taking up the new sound. As a result, this sound has evolved from a nonnative alternative to a systematic variation and it is being established as a sound change. This study has thus further confirmed that social identity plays a pivotal role in driving language features into language variation and language change.

Keywords: language contact, sound change, language change, language variation, social identity
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.2.05liu
References
Aitchison, J.
(2001) Language change: progress or decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.
(2001) Patterns of variation including change. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes, (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp.349–372). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
(2003) Sociolinguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: Balckwell.Google Scholar
Chen, M. & Wang, W.
(1975) Sound change: actuation and implementation. Language, 511, 255–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(1995) Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language, 71, 490–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cukor-Avila, P.
(2000) The stability of individual vernaculars. University of North Texas MS.Google Scholar
Eckert, P.
(2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 121:453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fengsheng
(2012) Xiandai chengshi shenghuo [Modern urban life]. Retrieved January 17, 2012 from [URL].
Garrett, P.
(2010) Attitudes to language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y.
(2005, January 23) Young people do not understand Shanghai slang, and a deputy of the People’s Congress calls for “protection” of Shanghainese. Youth Daily. Retrieved May 17, 2012, from [URL].
Hoffman, M. F. & Walker, J. A.
(2010) Ethnolects and the city: ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change, 22(1), 37–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1994) Principles of linguistic change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2001) Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2006 [1966]) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. Guion, S., Hura, S., Moon, S. & Willerman, R.
(1995) Is sound change adaptive? Revista di Linguistica, 71, 5–37.Google Scholar
Liu, G.
(2007) A sound variation or a sound change in Shanghainese? Chinese Studies Review, 21, 18–27.Google Scholar
Luqiu, L.
(2010, June 17) Fangyan yu chengshi (Dialects and cities). Bund Pictorial, Issue 391.Google Scholar
McMahon, A.
(1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L.
(2002) Social networks. J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes, (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp.549–572). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E. A.
(1978) Verb borrowing. In J. H. Greenberg, (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 11). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
(2008) Language evolution: contact, competition, and change. London/New York: Continuum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(2003) Formal and functional motivation for language change. In H. Raymond, (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp.16–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J. J.
(1989) Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In L. E. Breivik & E. H. Jahr, (Eds.), Language change: contributions to the study of its causes. [Series: Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs No. 43] (pp.173–198). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Sound change as nature's speech perception experiment. Speech Communication. 13, 155–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podesva, R. J.
(2006) Phonetic detail in sociolinguistic variation: Its linguistic significance and role in the construction of social meaning. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Qian, R.
(2003) Shanghai Yuyan Fazhan Shi (A history of Shanghai language development). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing.Google Scholar
(2011, May 3) Rang Shanghai haizi congxiao xuehao Shanghai hua [Let Shanghai kids learn Shanghainese from childhood]. Shanghai: Xinmin Evening Newspaper, p. B14.Google Scholar
Shanghai Bureau of Statistics
(2010) Shanghai Statistical Yearbook 2010. Retrieved August 5, 2011 from [URL].
Silverstein, M.
(2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 231, 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H.
(Ed.) (1982) Social identity and intergroup relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
(2003) Contact as a source of language change. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda, (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp.687–712). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. G & Kaufman, T.
(1988) Language contact, creolization, and Genetic linguistics. Berkley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, J., Hogg, M. et al.
(1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Coetsem, F.
(1988) Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Youth Daily
(2011) Daxuesheng ban huyuban laide duoshi Shanghai xiaonan, queshao Huyu huanjing shi tamen jiang buhao Shanghai hua de zhuyin (Most pupils in a Shanghainese class run by university students are local kids, and a lack of Shanghainese-speaking environment is the main reason why kids do not speak Shanghaiese). Retrieved August 2, 2011, from [URL].
Zhang, Q.
(2005) A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Chen, Hanyu
2023. The Heritage Language Protection and Teaching in the Yangtze River Delta - Take the Shanghai Dialect as an Example. BCP Business & Management 41 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.