Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 37:1 (2014) ► pp.4361
References
Arnold, N. & Ducate, L.
(Eds.) (2011) Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching. Texas: The Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.Google Scholar
Australian Council of State School Organisations and the Australian Parents Council (ACSSO)
(2007) Attitudes towards the study of languages in Australian schools. Retrieved from [URL].
Bauer, J. & Kenton, J.
(2005) Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 131, 519–546.Google Scholar
Block, D. & Cameron, D.
(2002) (Eds), Globalisation and language teaching. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., & Maton, K.
(2010) Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., & Maton, K., & Kervin, L.
(2008) The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. J.
(2013) Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Boulton, A., Chateau, A., Pereiro, M., & Azzam-Hannachi, R.
(2008) Learning to learn languages with ICT – But how? CALL-EJ Online, 9(2). Retrieved from [URL].
Burr, V.
(2003) Social constructionism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burston, R.
(2006) Working towards effective assessment of CALL. In R. Donaldson & M. A. Haggstrom (Eds.), Changing language education through CALL (pp. 249–270). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chiu, Y.-H.
(2013) Computer-assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), E52–E56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.
(2005) Australia’s language potential. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Conklin, E. J.
(2006) Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cuban, L.
(2003) Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Robertson, S., & Shortis, T.
(2004) You can’t not go with the technological flow, can you? Constructing ‘ICT’ and ‘teaching and learning’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 201, 456&470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dandolopartners
(2013) DER mid-program review: Assessing progress of the DER and potential future directions – final report. Retrieved from [URL].
Davies, G., Otto, S. E. K., & Ruschoff, B.
(2013) Historical perspectives on CALL. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 54–85). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Denzin, N.
(1989) Interpretative interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Department of Education, EmploymentWorkplace Relations
(2011) Digital education revolution. Retrieved from [URL]
Department of Education Western Australia
(2012) Students and ICT. Retrieved from [URL]/
(2013) Students and ICT. Retrieved from [URL].
Dornyei, Z.
(2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M.
(2009) Digital technology and language learning: A review of policy and research evidence. In M. Evans (Ed.), Foreign language learning with digital technology (pp. 7–31). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Felix, U.
(2003) Online education: Great expectations turned into myths? In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003 (pp. 3389–3407). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
Fischer, R.
(2013) A conceptual overview of the history of the CALICO journal: The phases of CALL. CALICO Journal, 30(1), 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C.
(1973) The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Grgurovic, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C.
(2013) A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(2), 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, A.
(2012) Literacy teachers’ perceptions of professional development that increases integration of technology into literacy instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 37–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, C.
(2011) Students, the net generation, and digital natives. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies (pp. 30–45). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kelder, J., Marshall, P., & Perry, A.
(2005) Social constructionism with a twist of pragmatism: A suitable cocktail for information system research. Paper presented at the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, NSW.
Kramsch, K. & Thorne, S.
(2002) Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalisation and language teaching (pp. 83–101). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kozma, R.
(2003) Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Computers in Education, 36(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. & Plomp, T.
(Eds) (2008) Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the World: Findings from the IEA sites 2006 study. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, 231 13–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.
(2013, May 13) Where to after the digital education revolution? Education Technology Solutions Magazine. Retrieved from [URL].
Lee, M., Finger, G.
(2010) The challenge: Developing a networked mode of schooling. In M. Lee & G. Finger (Eds.), Developing a networked school community: A guide to realising the vision (pp. 3–16). Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.Google Scholar
Liddicoat. A. J. & Scarino, A.
(2010) Languages in Australian education: An introduction. In A. J. Liddicoat & A. Scarino. (Eds.), Languages in Australian education: Problems, prospects and future directions (pp. 1–10). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Liddicoat. A. J., Scarino, A., Curnow, T. J., Kohler, M., Scrimgeour, A., & Morgan, A.-M.
(2007) An investigation of the state and nature of languages in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.
(1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S.
(2012) Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luckin, R., Blight, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R.
(2012) Decoding learning: The proof, promise and potential of digital education. London: Nesta.Google Scholar
MCEECDYA
(2011) National plan for languages education in Australian schools. Melbourne: Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
MCEETYA, & MCVTE
(2008) Joint ministerial statement on information and communications technologies in Australian education and training: 2008-2011. Carlton, Victoria: MCEETYA & MCVTE.Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B.
(1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Meskill, G., & Quah, J.
(2013) Researching language learning in the age of social media. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 86–111). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M.
(1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ministers’ Media Centre
(2012) Computers for all Australian students in 2012 [Press release]. Retrieved from [URL]
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.
(2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J.
(2007) Technological pedagogical content lnowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 2007(11), 2214–2226.Google Scholar
Mitchell, I.
(2009) The potential of the internet as a language-learning tool. In M. Evans (Ed.), Foreign language learning with digital technology (pp. 7–31). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Morrell, E.
(2012) Teachers as critical researchers: An empowering Model for Urban Education. In S. Steinberg & G. Cannella (Eds) 2012 Critical Qualitative Research Reader (pp. 364–278). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Motteram, G.
(1999) Changing the research paradigm: Qualitative research methodology and the CALL classroom. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computerassisted language learning (pp. 201–213). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
Muspratt, S., & Freebody, P.
(2007) Students’ perceptions of the characteristics of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ digital learning objects. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle. Retrieved from [URL].
Newhouse, C. P.
(2002) The impact of ICT on teaching and learning: A literature review prepared for the Western Australian Department of Education. Perth: Western Australian Department of Education.Google Scholar
(2008) Maximising the impact of ICT on learning in schools. In Australian council for computers in education 2008 conference proceedings. Canberra: Australian Council for Computers in Education. Retrieved from [URL].
NSW Department of Education and Communities
(2012) The digital education revolution in NSW. Retrieved from [URL]
Norris. L
(2010) The current state and nature of languages teacher education. In A.J. Liddicoat & A. Scarino. (Eds.), Languages in Australian education: Problems, prospects and future direction (pp. 71–85). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R.
(2007) Introduction. In R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers (pp. 3–16). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Telecollaboration and CALL. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 210–236). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Patton, M.
(2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M.
(2009) From blogs to bombs: The future of digital technologies in education. Perth: UWA Publishing.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
(2004) Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 784–807). Victoria: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M.
(2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved from [URL].
Reinders, H., Thomas, M., & Warschauer, M.
(2013) Section introduction. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted learning (pp. 205–209). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M.
(1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schmid, E.
(2006) Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the English language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shneiderman, B.
(2002) Leonardo’s laptop: Human needs and the new computing technologies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schenker, T.
(2012) Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 449–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N.
(2011) Editorial: In praise of pessimism-the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smeets, E.
(2005) Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, G.
(2013) Language learning with technology: Ideas for integrating technology in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, S. & Cannella, G.
(Eds) (2012) Critical qualitative research reader. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G.
(2007) A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(02), 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2012) Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F.
(2011) What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order metaanalysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M.
(2011) Technology, education, and the discourse of the digital native: Between evangelists and dissenters. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M.
(2013) Contemporary computer-assisted language learning: The role of digital media and incremental change. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 30–47). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
van Manen, M.
(1997) Researching loved experience (2nd ed.). Ontario: Transcontinental Printing Inc.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Vasquez, V.
(2012) Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, M.
(1995) Globalization: Key ideas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.
(2003) Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO journal, 21(1), 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Guiding principles for scientific inquiry and implications for research on technology and language education. Research in technology and second language learning: Developments and directions (pp. 3–15). Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L.
(2002) Conditions for classroom technology innovations. The Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Black, Stephen, Jan Wright & Ken Cruickshank
2018. The struggle for legitimacy: language provision in two ‘residual’ comprehensive high schools in Australia. Critical Studies in Education 59:3  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Bond, Melissa, Katja Buntins, Svenja Bedenlier, Olaf Zawacki-Richter & Michael Kerres
2020. Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17:1 DOI logo
Díaz, Adriana, Marisa Cordella & Fabiane Ramos
2021. Resistance to Monoligualism: School Principals and Head of Languages’ Voices on Factors that Promote and Deter Languages Education in Queensland, Australia. In Language Learning in Anglophone Countries,  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Díaz, Adriana R., Naomi Fillmore & Marisa Cordella
2023. The (im)possibility of breaking the cycle of rippling circularities affecting Australian language education programs: a Queensland example. Language Learning in Higher Education 13:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Pepple, Dennis Gabriel
2022. An ecological perspective of student engagement through digital technology: Practical application and implications. British Educational Research Journal 48:6  pp. 1216 ff. DOI logo
Slaughter, Yvette, Wally Smith & John Hajek
2019. Videoconferencing and the networked provision of language programs in regional and rural schools. ReCALL 31:2  pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Young, Nick, Emma Rawlings Smith & Kieran Hodgkin
2024. Student engagement in the first year of university in Wales during COVID-19. Journal of Further and Higher Education  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Wangda, Gaoxia Zhu & Ying Hua
2024. Enhancing undergraduates’ engagement in a learning community by including their voices in the technological and instructional design. Computers & Education 214  pp. 105026 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.