Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp.6684
References
Bernstein, B.
(1990) Class, codes and control 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crew, G., & Rogers, G.
(1992) Lucy’s bay. Nundah, Australia: Jam Roll Press.Google Scholar
Hathorn, L., & Rogers, G.
(1994) Way home. Sydney: Red Fox.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C.
(2000) The dynamics of picturebook communication. Children’s Literature in Education, 31(4), 225–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Barrot, Jessie S.
2023. Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:4  pp. 584 ff. DOI logo
Bitchener, John
2019. The Intersection between SLA and Feedback Research. In Feedback in Second Language Writing,  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Bitchener, John
2021. Written Corrective Feedback. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching,  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Borràs, Judith & Sonia López-Serrano
2023. “How Can I Correct What I Don't Know?”. In New Approaches to the Investigation of Language Teaching and Literature [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Breslin, Dermot
2021. Finding collective strength in collective despair; exploring the link between generic critical feedback and student performance. Studies in Higher Education 46:7  pp. 1312 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Dan, Qiandi Liu & Reza Norouzian
2023. Effectiveness of written corrective feedback in developing L2 accuracy: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882211473 ff. DOI logo
Caruso, Marinella, Nicola Fraschini & Sabine Kuuse
2019. Online Tools for Feedback Engagement in Second Language Learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:1  pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Yuan-shan, Hui-Tzu Hsu & Hsuan-Yu Tai
2023. The relative effects of corrective feedback and language proficiency on the development of L2 pragmalinguistic competence: the case of request downgraders. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Cheng, Xiaolong & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. Sustaining University English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing Performance through Provision of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback. Sustainability 13:15  pp. 8192 ff. DOI logo
Fan, Ning
2023. Exploring the Effects of Automated Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Quality: A Mixed-Methods Study. SAGE Open 13:2 DOI logo
Han, Ye
2017. Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System 69  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Hassan, Mehmood Ul, Mehwish Malghani & Kinza Ali Zai
2021. EXPLORING UNDERGRADUATE EFL LEARNERS’ BELIEFS ABOUT WCF AND THEIR IMPACT ON IMPROVING WRITING SKILLS IN PAKISTANI UNIVERSITIES. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 9:3  pp. 1430 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Lianjiang, Shulin Yu, Nan Zhou & Yiqin Xu
2023. English Writing Instruction in Chinese Students’ Experience: A Survey Study. RELC Journal 54:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shaofeng & Saeed Roshan
2019. The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 45  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rastgou, Ali
2022. How feedback conditions broaden or constrain knowledge and perceptions about improvement in L2 writing: A 12-week exploratory study. Assessing Writing 53  pp. 100633 ff. DOI logo
Reynolds, Barry Lee & Xiaofang Zhang
2022. Medical School Students’ Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study. Behavioral Sciences 13:1  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
SIA, Pei Fen Dawn & Yin Ling CHEUNG
2017. WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING INSTRUCTION: A QUALITATIVE SYNTHESIS OF RECENT RESEARCH. Issues in Language Studies 6:1 DOI logo
Sinha, Tara Shankar & Hossein Nassaji
2022. ESL learners’ perception and its relationship with the efficacy of written corrective feedback. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Thi, Nang Kham & Marianne Nikolov
2022. How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement One Another in Myanmar EFL Students’ Writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 31:6  pp. 767 ff. DOI logo
Tian, Lili & Yu Zhou
2020. Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System 91  pp. 102247 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Shulin, Lianjiang Jiang & Nan Zhou
2020. Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing 44  pp. 100451 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Tiefu
2021. The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development. System 99  pp. 102493 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Tiefu, Xuemei Chen, Jiehui Hu & Pattarapon Ketwan
2021. EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.