Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp. 6684

Full-text

The effectiveness of written corrective feedback and the impact Lao learners’ beliefs have on uptake
References

References

Bernstein, B.
(1990) Class, codes and control 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crew, G., & Rogers, G.
(1992) Lucy’s bay. Nundah, Australia: Jam Roll Press.Google Scholar
Hathorn, L., & Rogers, G.
(1994) Way home. Sydney: Red Fox.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C.
(2000) The dynamics of picturebook communication. Children’s Literature in Education, 31(4), 225–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Bitchener, John
2019.  In Feedback in Second Language Writing,  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Breslin, Dermot
2019. Finding collective strength in collective despair; exploring the link between generic critical feedback and student performance. Studies in Higher Education  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Caruso, Marinella, Nicola Fraschini & Sabine Kuuse
2019. Online Tools for Feedback Engagement in Second Language Learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Han, Ye
2017. Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System 69  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Jiang, Lianjiang, Shulin Yu, Nan Zhou & Yiqin Xu
2021. English Writing Instruction in Chinese Students’ Experience: A Survey Study. RELC Journal  pp. 003368822098022 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Shaofeng & Saeed Roshan
2019. The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 45  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Tian, Lili & Yu Zhou
2020. Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System 91  pp. 102247 ff. Crossref logo
Yu, Shulin, Lianjiang Jiang & Nan Zhou
2020. Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing 44  pp. 100451 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Tiefu
2021. The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development. System 99  pp. 102493 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Tiefu, Xuemei Chen, Jiehui Hu & Pattarapon Ketwan
2021. EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.