Article published in:
Postgraduate Writing in a Globalised World
Edited by Emmaline Lear and Elke Stracke
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39:2] 2016
► pp. 181200
References
Aitchison, C.
(2009) Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905–916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C.
(2014) Writing groups, pedagogy, theory and practice. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond (pp. 27–54). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P.
(1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G.
(2000) Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, G. C. L.
(2014) Writing feedback as an exclusionary practice in higher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 262–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R.
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Abex.Google Scholar
Ewert, D. E.
(2009) L2 writing conferences: Investigating teacher talk. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 251–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T.
(2009) The ‘write’ skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M.
(1990) Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443–460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, B.
(2009) Challenging perspectives, changing practices. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 239–248). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guerin, C., Xafis, V., Doda, D. V., Gillam, M. H., Larg, A. J., Luckner, H., Jahan, N., Widayati, A., & Xu, C.
(2013) Diversity in collaborative research communities: A multicultural, multidisciplinary thesis writing group in public health. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(1), 65–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. de, & Villamil, O. S.
(1994) Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 484–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L.
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larcombe, W., McCosker, A., & O'Loughlin, K.
(2007) Supporting education PhD and DEd students to become confident academic writers: An evaluation of thesis writers’ circles. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 4(1), 54–63.Google Scholar
Lee, A., & Boud, D.
(2003) Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leont'ev, A. N.
(1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1981).The problem of activity in psychology. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–70). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Li, L. Y.
(2014) Scaffolding the thesis writing process. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond (pp. 145–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, L. Y., & Vandermensbrugghe, J.
(2011) Supporting the thesis writing process of international research students through an ongoing writing group. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 195–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, C. S.
(1991) Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J.
(2006) Cultural issues in peer response: Revisiting "culture". In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 42–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M.
(1992) An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 171–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patthey-Chavez, G. G., & Ferris, D. R.
(1997) Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 51–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 60(4), 457–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. R.
(2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thonus, T.
(2004) What are the differences?: Tutor interactions with first-and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), 227–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J.
(2010) Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. C. M. de
(1996) Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 23–41). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1981) The genesis of higher mental functions. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(2012) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Weissberg, R.
(2006) Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 246–265). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.
(2002) Undergraduate second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Basic Writing, 21(2), 73–91.Google Scholar
(2004) Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), 173–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G.
(1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, S., & Lee, I.
(2015) Understanding EFL students' participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 572–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, W., & Mitchell, D. A.
(2012) Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 362–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Mochizuki, Naoko
2017. Contingent Needs Analysis for Task Implementation: An Activity Systems Analysis of Group Writing Conferences. TESOL Quarterly 51:3  pp. 607 ff. Crossref logo
Mochizuki, Naoko
2019. The lived experience of thesis writers in group writing conferences: The quest for “perfect” and “critical”. Journal of Second Language Writing 43  pp. 36 ff. Crossref logo
Starfield, Sue
2019.  In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 861 ff. Crossref logo
Starfield, Sue
2019.  In Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.