Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (1981) ► pp.120
References
Cena, R.M.
(1978) When is a phonological generalization psychologically real? Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Carol
(1973) “Reading, writing, and phonology”. In: Frank Smith (ed.), Psycholinguistics and Reading. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winstone. pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
Crothers, John
(1973) On the Abstractness Controversy. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels
(1975) “A phonological analysis of English sp, st, sk with special reference to speech error evidence”, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5, 1. 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressier, Wolfgang U.
(1979) “Arguments and non-arguments for naturalness in phonology: on the use of external evidence”, Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol II1, pp. 93–100, Copenhagen, Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fabian, E., Fabian and C. Peck
(1971) “The morphophonemics of Nabak”. Kivung 4, 3, pp. 147–160.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A.
(1971) “The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances”. Language 47, 1, pp. 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimes, J.E.
(1969) Phonological Analysis, Part One, Santa Ana, CA, Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Harms, Robert T.
(1973) “How abstract is Nupe?Language 46, 2. pp. 439–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
(1970) “How concrete is phonology?Language 46, 1. pp. 58–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G.K. and G.A. Sanders
(1978) The Functional determination of Phonological Rule Interactions, Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club,Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
(1975) “What are phonological theories about?” In: D. Cohen and J. Wirth (eds.), Testing Linguistic Hypotheses. Washington, Hemisphere Publ. Corp.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A.
(ed.) (1976) The Application and Ordering of Grammatical Rules, The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
(1979) “Psychological reality and the concept of phonological rule”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. II, pp. 114–120.Google Scholar
McElhanon, K.A.
(1970) “Selepet pronominal elements”. Pacific Linguistics A, 26, pp. 23–48.Google Scholar
(1979) “A fresh look at Nabak morphophonemics”, ( submitted to Kivungz ). ms.Google Scholar
(1980) “Another knock-out for generative phonology”. Paper presented to the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 25-27 August, 1980.
McElhanon, K.A. and C.L. Voorhoeve.
(1970) The Trans-New Guinea Phylum: Explorations in Deep-level Genetic Relationships. Pacific Linguistics B, 16.Google Scholar
Pike, E.V.
(1976) “Phonology”. In: Ruth M. Brend and K.L. Pike (eds.), Trends in Linguistics, Tagmemics, Vol. 1, Aspects of the Field, The Hague, Mouton, pp. 45–83.Google Scholar
Pike, K.L.
(1947) Phonemics. University of Michigan Publication, Linguistics Vol. III1, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(1967) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague, Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skousen, R.
(1974) “An explanatory theory of morphology”. Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 318–327.Google Scholar
(1979) “Empirical Interpretations of psychological reality:. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. II1, pp. 121–128.Google Scholar
Stampe, David
(1973) A Dissertation of Natural Phonology. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M. and W. Zonneveld
(1978) Where the Principles Fail. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar