Storytelling in legal settings
A case study from a Crown Prosecutor’s opening statement
A number of linguistic studies on courtroom discourse deal with witness examinations, however counsels’ opening statements have been given relatively little attention. Drawing on the analysis of a Crown Prosecutor’s opening statement in a murder trial held at the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, and using the Systemic Functional Linguistics framework (Halliday 1994), this study highlights the ways in which the prosecutor constructs his narrative of the crime in his opening statement in order to persuade the jurors of his views. Specifically, the analysis highlights the ways in which the narrative is made persuasive through its specific rhetorical organization and over-specification of orientational information, as well as more credible through quotations from participants with personal experience in the related events. It also shows the ways in which the prosecutor seeks to engage the jurors through his use of second-person pronouns, as well as his differentiated use of the crime participants’ names. Finally, this study highlights the dialogic and heteroglossic characteristics of the adversarial legal process, in that it both refers to what was previously stated and tries to anticipate the response of the jury, whose voice comes as the last word through their verdict.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
-
3.Theoretical framework
- 4.Findings
-
4.1The narrative and its rhetorical organization
- 4.2Orientational information
- 4.3Transitivity analysis
-
4.4Agency: ergative analysis
- 4.5Prosecution’s use of first- and second-person pronouns
- 4.6Use of crime participants’ names
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References
Bennet, W. L., & Feldman, M. S.
(
1981)
Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. London, New York: Tavistock Publications.
Caffarel, A.
(
2006)
A systemic functional grammar of French: From grammar to discourse. London: Continuum.
Chaemsaithong, K.
(
2014)
Interactive patterns of the opening statement in criminal trials: A historical perspective.
Discourse Studies, 16(3), 347–364.
Chaemsaithong, K.
(
2015a)
Communicating with silent addressees: Engagement features in the opening statement.
Language & Communication, 431, 35–46.
Chaemsaithong, K.
(
2015b)
Positioning self and others in the courtroom: Person markers in the opening statement.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 51(1), 1–25.
Chen, L.
(
2005)
Transitivity in media texts: Negative verbal process sub-functions and narrator bias.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 33–51.
Cochran Jr., J. L., & Rutten, T.
(
1996)
Journey to justice. New York: Ballantine Books.
Cotterill, J.
(
2003)
Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eades, D.
(
2010)
Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Eggins, S.
(
1994)
An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers Ltd.
Felton Rosulek, L. (
2008)
Manipulative silence and social representation in the closing arguments of a child sexual abuse case.
Text and Talk, 28 (4), 529–550.
Felton Rosulek, L.
(
2009)
The sociolinguistic creation of opposing representations of defendants and victims.
International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 16 (1), 1–30.
Felton Rosulek, L.
(
2016)
Dueling discourses: The construction of reality in closing arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibbons, J.
(
2003)
Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Goffman, E.
(
1981)
Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(
1994)
An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Heffer, C.
(
2005)
The language of jury trial: A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hobbs, P.
(
2008)
It’s not what you say but how you say it: The role of personality and identity in trial success.
Critical Discourse Studies, 5(3), 231–248.
Huisman, R.
(
2014)
Modality and the Law.
Annual Review of Functional Linguistics, 51, 7–21.
Jackson, B. S.
(
1988)
Narrative models in legal proof.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 1(3), 225–246.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
(
1967)
Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In
J. Helm (Ed.),
Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44).
Proceedings of the 1966 Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Lilley, L. S.
(
1999)
Opening statements: Lasting impressions. In
J. Schuetz &
L. S. Lilley (Eds.),
The O. J. Simpson trials: Rhetoric, media, and the law (pp. 36–57). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Lundquist, W. I.
(
1982)
Advocacy in opening statements.
Litigation, 8(3), 23.
Maley, Y., & Fahey, R.
(
1991)
Presenting the evidence: Constructions of reality in court.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 4(10), 3–17.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(
2008)
Genre relations: Mapping culture. London,Oakville: Equinox.
Mazzocco, P., & Green, M. C.
(
2011)
Narrative persuasion in legal settings: What’s the story? The Jury Expert, 23(3), 27–34.
O’Barr, W. M.
(
1982)
Linguistic evidence: Language, power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Queensland Law Reform Commission
(
2009)
A review of jury directions. Report No 66. Retrieved from
[URL]
Snedaker, K. H.
(
1991)
Storytelling in opening statements: Framing the argumentation of the trial. In
D. R. Papke (Ed.),
Narrative and the legal discourse: A reader in storytelling and the law. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
van Dijk, T. A.
(
1988)
News as discourse. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van Leeuwen, T.
(
1996)
The representation of social actors. In
C. R. Caldas-Coulthard &
M. Coulthard (Eds.),
Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.
Wagenaar, W.,
van Koppen, P. J., &
Crombag, H. F. M. (
1993)
Anchored narratives: The psychology of criminal evidence. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2023.
Membership categorization devices in courtroom opening and closing speeches.
Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.