Article published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 2Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2] 2004
► pp. 73–102
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2] 2004
► pp. 73–102
Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event
The paper compares two typologically distinct languages with regard to their lexicalization patterns in encoding metaphorical motion events: (1) verb-framed (V-language, represented by Turkish), in which the preferred pattern for framing motion events is the use of a path verb with an optional manner adjunct (e.g.,enter running), and (2) satellite-framed (S-language, represented by English), in which path is lexicalized in an element associated with the verb, leaving the verb free to encode manner (e.g.,run in). The paper focuses on typological differences in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of metaphorical motion events, using data from novels written originally in English or Turkish, and further extends the applicability of the typological dichotomy to the metaphorical uses of the lexicon.
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
Alhamdan, Bandar, Oudah Alenazi & Zouheir A. Maalej
2018. Motion verbs in Modern Standard Arabic and their implications for Talmy's lexicalization patterns. Language Sciences 69 ► pp. 43 ff. 
Alonso, Rosa Alonso
2016. Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of boundary crossing events in L2 acquisition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 161 ff.
Alonso Alonso, Rosa
Banaruee, Hassan, Omid Khatin-Zadeh & Danyal Farsani
2023. Motion events in English textbooks: a cross-linguistic analysis of Path. Frontiers in Education 8
Caballero, Rosario
2007. Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics 39:12 ► pp. 2095 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2017. Chapter 8. Metaphorical motion constructions across specialized genres. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 229 ff.
Cappelle, Bert
2020. Chapter 8. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff.
Chen, Shujun & Lihuan Wu
2023. Variable motion encoding within Chinese: a usage-based perspective. Language and Cognition 15:3 ► pp. 480 ff.
Combe, Christophe & Dejan Stosic
2024. Processing manner under high cognitive pressure: Evidence from French–English and English–French simultaneous interpreting. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
Emerson, Samantha N., Christopher M. Conway & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2020. Semantic P600—but not N400—effects index crosslinguistic variability in speakers’ expectancies for expression of motion. Neuropsychologia 149 ► pp. 107638 ff.
Emerson, Samantha N., Valery D. Limia & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. Cross-linguistic transfer in Turkish–English bilinguals’ descriptions of motion events. Lingua 264 ► pp. 103153 ff.
EMERSON, SAMANTHA N., ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN & GWEN A. FRISHKOFF
2016. Effects of motion type and modality on word learning in English. Applied Psycholinguistics 37:3 ► pp. 643 ff.
FEIST, MICHELE I. & SARAH E. DUFFY
2020. On the path of time: temporal motion in typological perspective. Language and Cognition 12:3 ► pp. 444 ff.
Graf, Eva-Maria
2011. Adolescents’ use of spatial TIME metaphors: A matter of cognition or sociocommunicative practice?. Journal of Pragmatics 43:3 ► pp. 723 ff.
İŞLER, Cemre
2022. TYPOLOGICAL VARIATION IN ENCODING THE MANNER OF MOTION EVENT IN TRANSLATED VERSIONS OF ENGLISH AND TURKISH SHORT STORIES. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 32:3 ► pp. 895 ff.
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
2017. FIGURE and GROUND in the construal of motion: a registerial perspective. <i>WORD</i> 63:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
2019. The representation of motion in discourse: variation across registers. Language Sciences 72 ► pp. 71 ff.
KİLİMCİ, Abdurrahman
2017. The Impact of Explicit Instruction and Metalinguistic Awareness on Cross-linguistic Interference: Path Framing in Motion Events. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 16:4 ► pp. 1119 ff.
LEWANDOWSKI, WOJCIECH
2021. Variable motion event encoding within languages and language types: a usage-based perspective. Language and Cognition 13:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers. Second Language Research 37:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2023.
Running across the mind or across the park: does speech about physical and metaphorical motion go hand in hand?. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 411 ff.
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2024.
Translating Motion Events Across Physical and Metaphorical Spaces in Structurally Similar
Versus
Structurally Different Languages
. Metaphor and Symbol 39:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Molés-Cases, Teresa
2018. Some advances in the study of the translation of manner of motion events. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 152 ff.
Olofsson, Joel
2022. Chapter 9. Co-event relations in Swedish motion constructions. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 189 ff.
Piquer-Píriz, Ana María & Rafael Alejo-González
PONTEROTTO, DIANE
2017. Motion for emotion: an empirical cross-linguistic study of conceptual construals. Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Saldívar Arreola, Rafael, Álvaro Rábago Tánori & Eleonora Lozano Bachioqui
2015. La traducción de verbos de movimiento del inglés al español. Una aplicación práctica de la semántica componencial en la formación de traductores. Forma y Función 28:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Tütüncü, Irmak Su, Jing Paul, Samantha N. Emerson, Murat Şengül, Melanie Knezevic & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2023. When Gestures Do or Do Not Follow Language‐Specific Patterns of Motion Expression in Speech: Evidence from Chinese, English and Turkish. Cognitive Science 47:4
ÖZÇALIŞKAN, ŞEYDA
2015. Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics 36:2 ► pp. 485 ff.
Özçalışkan, Şeyda & Samantha N. Emerson
2016. Learning to think, talk, and gesture about motion in language-specific ways. In The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 20], ► pp. 177 ff.
Özçalışkan, Şeyda, Lauren J. Stites & Samantha N. Emerson
2017. Chapter 9. Crossing the road or crossing the mind. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 257 ff.
Özçalışkan, ŞLeyda
2007. Metaphors WeMove By: Children's Developing Understanding of Metaphorical Motion in Typologically Distinct Languages. Metaphor and Symbol 22:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Ünal, Ercenur, Ezgi Mamus & Aslı Özyürek
2023. Multimodal encoding of motion events in speech, gesture and cognition. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.