Article published in:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 3
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3] 2005
► pp. 216249
Cited by

Cited by 67 other publications

No author info given
2006.  In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics [ACL], ], Crossref logo
No author info given
2009.  In Cognitive Poetics [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics [ACL], ], Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature [Figurative Thought and Language, 3], Crossref logo
Abrantes, Ana Margarida
2009. The Mind on Stage: On the Relation between Theater and Cognition. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Achard-Bayle, Guy
2018. Texte, discours, cognition . Semiotica 2018:223  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Antović, Mihailo
2018.  In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79],  pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Antović, Mihailo
2018. From expectation to concepts: Toward multilevel grounding in musical semantics. Cognitive Semiotics 9:2  pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo
Antović, Mihailo
2018. Schemas, grounds, meaning: On the emergence of musical concepts through conceptual blending. Musicae Scientiae 22:1  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Antović, Mihailo
2022.  In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453],  pp. 553 ff. Crossref logo
Bajerowska, Anna
2021.  In Lingwistyka à la inter. Status i perspektywy badań interdyscyplinarnych, Crossref logo
Barczewska, Shala
2020. Conceptual Blends Across Image Macro Genres. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Batoréo, Hanna J.
2014. Criatividade linguística, cultura e ensino da língua portuguesa (português língua não‑materna). Studia Iberystyczne 13  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Berberović, Sanja & Nihada Delibegović Džanić
2022.  In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Berberović, Sanja & Mersina Mujagić
2017. A marriage of convenience or an amicable divorce: Metaphorical blends in the debates on Brexit. ExELL 5:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bernárdez, Enrique
2016.  In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Besada, José Luis
2018.  In Les dimensions relationnelles de l’art,  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Brandt, Line
2014. Metaphor and the Communicative Mind. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Brandt, Line & Per Aage Brandt
2005. Cognitive poetics and imagery. European Journal of English Studies 9:2  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Brandt, Per Aage
2010. The Screen is a Mental Space: Cognitive and Semiotic Aspects of Communication. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Brandt, Per Aage & Ulf Cronquist
2022.  The Garden: blending in the semiotics of songs. Semiotica 2022:246  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
Brandt, Per Aage
2011. What is cognitive semiotics? A new paradigm in the study of meaning. Signata :2  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
Bundgaard, Peer F.
2022. The semiotic scoubidou – a short intellectual biography of Per Aage Brandt. Cognitive Semiotics 15:1  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Caracciolo, Marco
2011. Another fusion taking place: Blending and interpretation. jlse 40:2  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Dr Catherine Demangeot, Professor Aman, Elliot, Esi A., Yazhen Xiao & Elizabeth Wilson
2015. A multicultural blend: metaphors, cognitive social capital and multiculturalism. International Marketing Review 32:2  pp. 200 ff. Crossref logo
Charlton, Patricia, Adamantios Koumpis, Christos Kouroupetroglou & Muriel Grenon
2018. Wunderkammers: Powerful Metaphors for ‘Tangible’ Experiential Knowledge Building. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2:3  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Conde Aldana, Juan Alberto
2018.  In Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film,  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Dancygier, Barbara
2022.  In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9],  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Dingfang, Shu
2009. Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1  pp. 314 ff. Crossref logo
Fisher, Vicky J.
2021. Embodied Songs: Insights Into the Nature of Cross-Modal Meaning-Making Within Sign Language Informed, Embodied Interpretations of Vocal Music. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Flórez Fuya, Franz
2020. ¿Una imagen es más racista (o clasista) que mil palabras? : “los otros” desde un enfoque semiótico cognitivo y fenoménico.. Revista de Antropología y Sociología: Virajes 22:1  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Freeman, Margaret H.
2006. Blending: A Response. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 15:1  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Gallagher, Shaun
2012.  In Knowing without Thinking,  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Hougaard, Anders
2021. Hyperembodiment. Cognitive Semiotics 14:2  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Hougaard, Anders, Todd Oakley & Seana Coulson
2022. Who’s talking? Cognitive semiotics in the (new media) wild. Cognitive Semiotics 15:1  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Karimi, P., M. L. Maher, K. Grace & N. Davis
2019. A computational model for visual conceptual blends. IBM Journal of Research and Development 63:1  pp. 5:1 ff. Crossref logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010. A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 21:4 Crossref logo
Laineste, Liisi & Władysław Chłopicki
2019. Co-construction of metaphors in Estonian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 153  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Lepesqueur, Marcus
2015. Schémas des interactions sémiotiques dans la construction du sens délirant. Semiotica 2015:205  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
McKellin, William H.
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Müller, Cornelia & Christina Schmitt
2015. Audio-visual metaphors of the financial crisis: meaning making and the flow of experience. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 15:2  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Oakley, Todd
2009.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Oakley, Todd
2011.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Odoardi, Paolo
2010. Armed with Irony for a Semiotic Guerilla: A Cognitive Semiotic Analysis of "Culture Jamming". Cognitive Semiotics 10:6  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Polak, Justyna
2017. The role of emergent structure in Conceptual Blending Theory – case studies of children in advertisements. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :17(2)  pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2017. Deliberately misleading or unintentionally ambiguous?. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3  pp. 346 ff. Crossref logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2020.  Foids are worse than animals. A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse. Topics in Linguistics 21:2  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2018. DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Rimehaug, Sebastian
2015. Barbara Dancygier and Eve Sweetser, Figurative Language. English Text Construction 8:2  pp. 269 ff. Crossref logo
Rocci, Andrea, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli
2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica 2018:220  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Romano, Manuela
2017. Are similes and metaphors interchangeable?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Romano, Manuela & Maria Dolores Porto
2016.  In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sanchís, Enrique Bernárdez
2010. Simile: Its Use and Function in Musil's <i>Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften</i>. Cognitive Semiotics 10:6  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Sandler, Sergeiy
2011. Reenactment: An Embodied Cognition Approach to Meaning and Linguistic Content. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Sandler, Sergeiy
2012. Reenactment: an embodied cognition approach to meaning and linguistic content. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11:4  pp. 583 ff. Crossref logo
Schorlemmer, Marco & Enric Plaza
2021. A uniform model of computational conceptual blending. Cognitive Systems Research 65  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2010. Der Einfluss kultureller und kontextueller Faktoren bei der Konstruktion integrierter Netzwerke in metaphorischen blends. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik 2010:52 Crossref logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2015. Metaphorical blends and their function in discourse on society. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1  pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo
Silvera-Roig, Marta
2020.  In Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics, Crossref logo
Simmonds, Gregory & Charles Spence
2017. Thinking inside the box: How seeing products on, or through, the packaging influences consumer perceptions and purchase behaviour. Food Quality and Preference 62  pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo
Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca & Manuela Romano
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 345 ff. Crossref logo
Souriau, Jacques
2015.  In S'exprimer et se faire comprendre,  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Sundararajan, Louise
2011. Spiritual Transformation and Emotion: A Semiotic Analysis. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health 13:1  pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo
Throne, Robin
2016. Past as Prologue. SAGE Open 6:3  pp. 215824401666210 ff. Crossref logo
Throne, Robin
2020.  In Multidisciplinary Issues Surrounding African Diasporas [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ],  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
Toolan, Michael & Jean Jacques Weber
2005. Introduction. European Journal of English Studies 9:2  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Vouvaris, Petros & Dimitris Tasoudis
2018. B(l)ending time, (de)compressing identity: Creative thought and meaning construction in Copy Shop (2001). Musicae Scientiae 22:1  pp. 88 ff. Crossref logo
Wicke, Philipp & Tony Veale
2021. Creative Action at a Distance: A Conceptual Framework for Embodied Performance With Robotic Actors. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.