Theoretical and methodological challenges presented by studying metaphor in its discourse environment are addressed. Complex dynamic systems theory provides a theoretical ‘discourse dynamics’ framework for describing metaphor in face-to-face conversation, and more generally, as a phenomenon that is at once linguistic, cognitive, affective and socio-cultural. Empirical data from post-conflict reconciliation conversations illustrate the procedures of metaphor-led discourse analysis, using metaphor to investigate patterns of talking and thinking. Identification of linguistic metaphors is followed by the extraction of patterns of metaphor use, which include metaphor clusters and ‘systematic metaphors’. Connections are made between metaphor in on-line talk, patterns of metaphor use in discourse events and metaphor in socio-cultural life. The final section of this article discusses whether the differences found between metaphor as hypothesised in conceptual metaphor theory and metaphor in real-world discourse reflect an essential incompatibility or can be used more positively in developing cognitive approaches to metaphor.
Afonso, Susana, Ana Sofia Afonso & Francisco Rodrigues
2019. Towards an effective use of language to explain light in the museum. Science Education 103:4 ► pp. 923 ff.
Agathe Schröder, Ulrike
2009. Preferential Metaphorical Conceptualizations in Everyday Discourse About Love in the Brazilian and German Speech Communities. Metaphor and Symbol 24:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike Agathe
2014. A abordagem cognitiva da metáfora em perspectiva pragmática nos séculos dezoito e dezenove: as contribuições de Lambert e Wegener a discussões atuais. Alfa : Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 58:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
2023. Helping scientists reflect on their relationship with rivers via frames. River Research and Applications
Allen, Melissa L. & Harriet Butler
2020. Can drawings facilitate symbolic understanding of figurative language in children?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 38:3 ► pp. 345 ff.
Begonja, Helga & Diana Prodanović Stankić
2024. ‘QUO VADIS, CORONA?’: METAPHORICAL FRAMING OF THE PANDEMIC IN DAILY PRESS. Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду 48:1-2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Benczes, Réka & Bence Ságvári
2018. Life is a battlefield: Conceptualizations of life among Hungarian Adults. Society and Economy 40:4 ► pp. 571 ff.
Cameron, Lynne, Robert Maslen, Zazie Todd, John Maule, Peter Stratton & Neil Stanley
2009. The Discourse Dynamics Approach to Metaphor and Metaphor-Led Discourse Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 24:2 ► pp. 63 ff.
Cameron, Lynne, Ana Pelosi & Heloísa Pedroso de Moraes Feltes
2014. Metaphorizing Violence in the UK and Brazil: A Contrastive Discourse Dynamics Study. Metaphor and Symbol 29:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2013. Bringing concepts from cognitive linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political. Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Costa, Josiane Marques da & Thiago da Cunha Nascimento
2019. As funções comunicativas de metáforas verbo-gestuais em uma interação entre intercambistas no Brasil. In Comunicação (inter)cultural em interação, ► pp. 223 ff.
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022. Do we need Queer Cognitive Linguistics?. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :16 (2022) ► pp. 241 ff.
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2023. Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Gorbunova, Natal’ya N., Rustam A. Archakov & Lalita A. Akhtayeva
2020. Metaphorization as a basis for transterminologization in the sphere od subject terminological nominations. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics :3(2020) ► pp. 92 ff.
Hoang, Ha & Frank Boers
2018. Gauging the association of EFL learners’ writing proficiency and their use of metaphorical language. System 74 ► pp. 1 ff.
Jensen, Thomas Wiben & Elena Cuffari
2014. Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol 29:4 ► pp. 278 ff.
Jensen, Thomas Wiben & Linda Greve
2019. Ecological Cognition and Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
KNAPTON, OLIVIA
2016. Dynamic conceptualizations of threat in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Language and Cognition 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Knapton, Olivia & Gabriella Rundblad
2018. Metaphor, discourse dynamics and register: applications to written descriptions of mental health problems. Text & Talk 38:3 ► pp. 389 ff.
Lasserre, Barbara
2010. Theory and practice: reconciling design-as analogies with real talk in design education. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 3:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
2014. Dementia care: using empathic curiosity to establish the common ground that is necessary for meaningful communication. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 21:6 ► pp. 477 ff.
Schlesinger, Mark
2018. Through a Distant Mirror: Reflections, Projections, and the Multiple Logics of Cross-national Comparisons. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 43:5 ► pp. 901 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2010. Mesclagens metafóricas e suas funções no discurso sobre a sociedade: um estudo comparativo. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 10:3 ► pp. 575 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2010. Der Einfluss kultureller und kontextueller Faktoren bei der Konstruktion integrierter Netzwerke in metaphorischen blends. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik 2010:52
2011. Book review: Lynne Cameron and Robert Maslen (eds), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London: Equinox, 2010, viii + 298 pp., ISBN 9781845534462, US$34.00 (hbk). Discourse Studies 13:4 ► pp. 507 ff.
Techatassanasoontorn, Angsana A, Lena Waizenegger & Bill Doolin
2023. When Harry, the human, met Sally, the software robot: Metaphorical sensemaking and sensegiving around an emergent digital technology. Journal of Information Technology 38:4 ► pp. 416 ff.
2010. Strategies for the Semi-Automatic Retrieval of Metaphorical Terms. Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Yang, Wenhui
2020. Introduction. In A Cross-Cultural Study of Commercial Media Discourses, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.