Review published in:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 5
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5] 2007
► pp. 324–334
Book review

Eva-Maria Graf. The Ontogenetic Development of Literal and Metaphorical Space in Language
Tübingen: Narr, 2006.

Reviewed by
| Universität Bremen
Published online: 29 November 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.5.16ten
References
Bates, E., Thal, D., & Janowsky, J.
(1992) Early language development and its neural correlates. In S. Segalowitz & I. Rapin (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology 71 (pp. 69–110). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
(1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 221, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herskovits, A.
(1986) Language and Spatial Cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics, 21 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T.
(2007) Space, Time, and the Use of Language: An Investigation of Relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
(2003) The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Sciences, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vorwerg, C. & Rickheit, G.
(1998) Typicality effects in the categorization of spatial relations. In C. Freksa, C. Habel & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge (pp. 203–222). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar