Article published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 6
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6] 2008
► pp. 5082
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2018. Investigating audience orientation in courtroom communication. Pragmatics and Society 9:4  pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley
2020. “Hi, Mr. President!”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Hartig, Alissa J.
2016. Conceptual blending in legal writing: Linking definitions to facts. English for Specific Purposes 42  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Maryns, Katrijn
2014. The interdiscursive construction of irresponsibility as a defence strategy in the Belgian Assize Court. Language & Communication 36  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler
2016. Fictive interaction and the conversation frame. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
QIU, SIQI & YIRUI LIANG
2018. Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2016. Pp. 384. ISBN 978-90-272-4671-4 (Hb), 978-90-272-6650-7 (E-book). Language and Cognition 10:3  pp. 544 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual
2022. Debate with zhuangzi. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian, Esther Pascual & Bosen Ma
2022. Who’s speaking for whom?. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 january 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.