Article published in:Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 6
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6] 2008
► pp. 50–82
Text for context, trial for trialogue
An enthnographic study of a fictive interaction blend
This paper deals with a prosecutor’s closing argument in a murder trial I did fieldwork on in California in 2000. This discourse is analyzed through the conceptual blend of the deceased victim ‘testifying’ through legal evidence. The emergence and argumentative power of this blend is examined vis à vis the participants’ knowledge of the embedding discourse and trial as well as their conceptualizations of what a trial is. I suggest a definition of a trial as a ‘semantic network’ (Langacker, 1987), which combines lawyers’ common definitions with the nature of factive and fictive interaction in Western courts (Pascual, 2002, 2006). The claim is that language users (meta)operate with intertwined layers of context conceptualization, constraining conceptual blending operations. The paper integrates cognitive linguistics with cognitive sociology (Cicourel, 1973) and cognitive and linguistic anthropology (Hutchins, 1990; Duranti, 1997). It also calls for the qualitative study of language through in-depth enthnography that ensures data validity.
Keywords: fictive interaction, conceptual blending, context, legal argumentation, cognitive sociology, enthnography
Published online: 15 December 2008
Cited by 8 other publications
Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley
Hartig, Alissa J.
Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler
QIU, SIQI & YIRUI LIANG
Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.