Cover not available
Review published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 6
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6] 2008
► pp. 283–301
Book review

Mike Hannay & Gerard J. Steen (Eds.). Structural-Functional Studies in English Grammar: In Honour of Lachlan Mackenzie [Studies in Language Companion Series, 83]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007. vi+399 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 3093 5 https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/slcs​.83

Reviewed by
| University of Almería
Published online: 15 December 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.12gon
References (35)
References
Butler, C. S. (2003a). Structure and Function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the Simplex Clause (Studies in Language Companion Series, 631). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2003b). Structure and Function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From Clause to Discourse and Beyond (Studies in Language Companion Series, 641). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2005). Functionalist theories of language. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 696–704). Oxford: Elsevier. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Butler, C. S. & F. Gonzalvez-Garcia. (2005). Situating FDG in functional-cognitive space: An initial study. In J. L. Mackenzie & M. L. A. Gomez-Gonzalez (Eds.), Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar (Linguistic Insights, 261) (pp. 109–158). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: The Structure of the Clause (2nd revised ed., edited by K. Hengeveld). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fabre, C. & P. Sebillot. (1995). Calculability of the semantics of English nominal compounds: Combining general linguistic rules and corpus-based semantic information. Rapport de Recherche-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, 27421, 1–39.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalvez-Garcia, F. & C. S. Butler. (2006). Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 41: 39–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & C. Matthiessen. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. 3rd edn.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (1981). Towards an explanation of the possessive construction NP’s N and N of NP. Journal of Linguistics, 171, 247–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K. (2004a). The architecture of a Functional Discourse Grammar. In J. L. Mackenzie & M. L. A. Gomez-Gonzalez (Eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar (pp. 1–21). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2004b). Epilogue. In J. L. Mackenzie & M. L. A. Gomez-Gonzalez (Eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar (pp. 365–378). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2005). Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In C. de Groot & K. Hengeveld (Eds.), Morphosyntactic Expression in Functional Grammar (pp. 53–86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K. & J. L. Mackenzie. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, J. N. (1978). The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. L. (1992a). Places and things. In M. Fortescue, P. Harder & L. Kristofferson (Eds.), Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective (pp. 253–276). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992b). English spatial prepositions in Functional Grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar, 461.Google Scholar
(1995). English nominalizations in the layered model of the sentence. In B. Devriendt, L. Goossens and J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Complex Structures: A Functionalist Perspective (pp. 325–355). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1998). The basis of syntax in the holophrase. In M. Hannay & A. M. Bolkestein (Eds.), Functional Grammar and Verbal Interaction (Functional Grammar Series, 171) (pp. 267–296). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Functional Discourse Grammar and language production. In J. L. Mackenzie & M. L. A. Gomez-Gonzalez (Eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar (pp. 179–195). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. L. & M. L. A. Gomez-Gonzalez. (2004). (Eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language, 791, 682–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbach, A. (2002). Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. E. (1994). Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun-Noun Compounds (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 1231). Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1996). Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & R. B. Dasher. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., R. D. (2005). The Syntax-Semantics Pragmatic Interface: An Introduction to Role and Reference Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Semantic macroroles and language processing. In I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie and A. D. Friederici (Eds.), Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 263–302). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality (corrected edition). New York, NY: The Free Press (original edition 1929: Macmillan).Google Scholar