Review published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 7Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 334–344
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 334–344
Book review
. Creativity and Convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech
Reviewed by
References
Black, M.
(1979) More about metaphor. In A. Ortony, (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 19–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boroditsky, L.
(2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. 
(2001) Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Boroditsky, L. & M. Ramscar
(2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188.
Cienki, A. & C. Muller
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.
(2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S. & B. Keysar
(1990) Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 11, 3–18.
Grady, J.
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kovecses, Z. & G. Radden
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37–77.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
(1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: CA: Stanford University Press.
(1999) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Otal, J. L.
(2001) On high-level conceptual structure and discourse. RESLA, 141, 325–336.
Otal, J. L. & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza
(2007) Modelling thought in language use: At the crossroads between discourse, pragmatics, and cognition. Jezikoslovije, 8(2), 115–167.
Rohrer, T.
(2006) The body in space: Dimensions of embodiment. In J. Zlatev, T. Ziemke, R. Frank and R. Dirven (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind, vol. 21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & L. Perez
(2003) Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In K. U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatics (pp. 23–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & J. L. Otal
(2002) Metonymy, Grammar, and Communication. Granada: Comares.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & R. Mairal
(2007) High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K-M. Kopcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 33–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & S. Pena
(2005) Conceptual interaction, cognitive operations and projection spaces. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza & S. Pena (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction (pp. 254–280). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
(1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol. 1: Concept Structuring System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tendahl, M. & R. W. Gibbs
(2008) Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and Relevance Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864.
Wilson, D. & R. Carston
(2008) Metaphor and the ‘emergent property’ problem: A relevancetheoretic treatment. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 31, 1–40.