Review published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 7Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 345–356
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 345–356
Book review
Hilpert, M. (2008). Germanic Future Constructions. A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change
Reviewed by
References (18)
Bybee, J. L., W. Pagliuca and R. D. Perkins. (1991). Back to the future. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 2. (pp. 17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Bybee, J. L., R. D. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect and mood in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Guilquin, G. & S.Th. Gries. (2008). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26.
Gries, S.Th. (2003). Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: The case of Particle Placement. London/New York: Continuum Press
(2004). Coll.Analysis 31. A program for R for Windows 2.x (available from the author)
Gries, S.Th. & M. Hilpert. (2008). The identification of stages in diachronic data: variabilitybased neighbor clustering. Corpora, 3(1), 59–81.
Gries, S.Th. & A. Stefanowitsch. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129.
. (Eds.). (2006). Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(to appear). Cluster analysis and the identification of collexeme classes. In S. Rice & J. Newman (Eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. CSLI Publications.
Heine, B. (1995). On the German werden future. In W. Abraham, T. Givon, and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse, Grammar and Typology (pp. 119–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hilpert, M. (2006). Distinctive collexemes and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 243–256.
Hilpert, M. & S.Th. Gries. (2008). Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora. Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing. ( )
)Szmrecsanyi, B. (2006). Morpho-Syntactic Persistency in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. (TiLSM 1771) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. A comment. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 257–262.
Stefanowitsch, A. & S.Th. Gries. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the inter-action between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 81, 209–243.
Vater, H. (1997). Werden als Modalverb. In J. P. Calbert & H. Vater (Eds.), Aspekte der Modalität (pp. 71–145). Tubingen: Narr.
Wulff, S. (2009). Rethinking Idiomaticity. London/New York: Continuum Press
Zeschel, A. (Ed.). (2008). Usage-based approaches to language processing and representation. Special Issue of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3).