Cover not available
Article published In:
The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 1:1 (2017) ► pp.23–44

Attribute agenda setting and information overload

Computer-assisted analysis for understanding compelling arguments

| Texas Tech University
The compelling argument concept, one of the least studied components of attribute agenda setting, suggests that some attributes increase the salience of an object on the public agenda of issues. By conducting two studies, this article examines the compelling argument concept applying both manual content analysis (Study 1) and computerized-analysis tools (Study 2), considering frequency and degree centrality as measures of attribute salience. Results show that the application of computer-aided methods and mathematical techniques can efficiently identify attributes and estimate degree centrality, which are the core elements of the second and third level of the agenda-setting theory, respectively. Also, findings indicate that absolute frequency, rather than the presence or absence of an attribute in a news story, is a more parsimonious measure of redundancy to identify compelling arguments in news stories. This study proposes methodological innovations that further expand the scope of attribute agenda setting in the big data landscape.
Article outline
  • Attribute agenda setting and compelling arguments
  • Big data tools for understanding media content
  • Hypothesis and research questions
  • Study 1
    • Method
    • Data analysis
    • Results
  • Study 2
    • Method
    • Data analysis
    • Results
  • Discussion
    • Theoretical connotations: Absolute frequency to understand salience
    • Methodological contributions: A new approach for compelling arguments
    • Practical implications: Analysis of big data
  • Limitations and Future Research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 2 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.1.1.04sal
References (37)
References
Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., & Livingston, S. (2006). None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bowe, B.J., Fahmy, S., & Wanta, W. (2013). Missing religion: Second level agenda setting and Islam in American newspapers. The International Communication Gazette, 75(7), 636–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chyi, H. I., & McCombs, M. (2004). Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 22–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P., Nag, M. & Blei, D. (2013) Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 411, 570–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (2015). Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data & Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghanem, S. I. (1996). Media coverage of crime and public opinion: An exploration of the second level of agenda setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
(1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. E. McCombs, D. Shaw & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy (pp.309–330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guo, L. (2012). The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 616–631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, L., Chen, Y., Vu, H., Wang, Q., Aksamit, R., Guzek, D., Jachimowski, M. & McCombs, M. (2014). Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland. Journalism Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, L. & McCombs, M. (eds.) (2016). The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011a). Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. query Paper presented at the International Communication Association (ICA) Annual Conference, Boston.
(2011b). Toward the third level of agenda setting theory: A network agenda setting model. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
Guo, L., Vargo, C. J., Pan, Z., Ding, W., & Ishwar, P. (2016) Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1–28.Google Scholar
Hasell, A. A., & McGregor, S. C. (2016). Black-box algorithms: Scholarly use of proprietary coding software in communication research. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. & Kim, Y. (2014) Theoretical and methodological trends of agenda setting theory: A thematic meta-analysis of the last five decades. Working paper, University of Alabama.Google Scholar
Kiousis, S. (2005). Compelling arguments and attitude strength. Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(2), 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. C.; Zamith, R. & Hermida, A. (2013). Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 34–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littau, J. & Stewart, D. R. (2015). “Truthiness” and second-level agenda setting: Satire news and its influence on perceptions of television news credibility. Electronic News, 9(2), 122–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edition). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr. & A. E. Grant (Eds), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the world pp. 67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCombs, M., Holbert, L., Kiousis, S., & Wanta, W. (2011). The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. & Zhu, J. (1995). Capacity, diversity and volatility of the public agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, S. J. (2011). Attention, attitude, and behavior: Second-level agenda-setting effects as a mediator of media use and political participation. Communication Research, 40(5), 698–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. California: Sage.Google Scholar
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. R., & Fico, F. G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Saldaña, M. & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2016). From Compelling Arguments to Compelling Associations at the Third Level of Agenda Setting. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting, (pp. 104–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sheafer, T. (2007) How to evaluate It: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 571, 21–39.Google Scholar
Sjøvaag, H., & Stavelin, E. (2012) Web media and the quantitative content analysis: Methodological challenges in measuring online news content. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(2), 215–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Son, Y. J. & Weaver, D. (2005). Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U.S. election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 174–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 641, 296–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanta, W. & and Hu, Y. (1994). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yioutas, J. & Segvic, I. (2003). Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda Setting and framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 567–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Hess, Kristy, Edson Tandoc Jnr & Oscar Westlund
2022. Editorial: Digital Journalism Studies, Its Core and Periphery. Digital Journalism 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alkazemi, Mariam, Sameneh Oladi Ghadikolai, Marilynn Oetjens & Edward L. Boone
2021. Attribute Agenda Setting on Twitter and theWall Street Journal: The Case of Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. Review of Middle East Studies 55:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Vu, Hong Tien, Maxwell McCombs, Annelise Russell & Paromita Pain
2020. Deepening the concept of  ‘compelling arguments’. The Agenda Setting Journal 4:2 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.