Since its initial introduction, the paradigm of agenda-setting has become more refined and complex. In addition to the introduction of intervening factors the agenda-setting paradigm is now challenged by a rapidly changing media environment. This paper reviews the impact of online media technologies and digital platforms on the basic assumptions of the theory. The review sets out to reassess the conceptualization of the agenda-setting theorem by highlighting the development of new processes, attributes and features applicable to the online media. Our review, based on the findings of numerous studies on new media and agenda-setting, suggests several modifications of the basic theory.
Althaus, S. L. (2002). American News Consumption during Times of National Crisis. Political Science & Politics, 31, 517–521.
Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda-setting and the “new” news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of theNew York Times. Communication Research, 29(2), 180–207.
Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling more of less. New York: Hyperion.
Balmas, M., & Sheafer, T. (2010). Candidate Image in Election Campaigns: Attribute Agenda Setting, Affective Priming, and Voting Intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22 (2): 204–229.
Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gatekeepers, virtual communities and their gated: Multidimensional tensions in cyberspace. International Journal of Communications, Law and Policy 111, 1–28.
Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Information Science and Technology 59 (9), 1–20.
Baum, M. A. & Groeling T. (2008). Online media and the polarization of American political discourse, Political Communication, 251, 345–365.
Bennett, L. (2004). Gatekeeping and press-government relations: A multi-gated model of news construction. In L. Kaid, (Ed.), The handbook of political communication (pp. 283–313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennett, L. & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 581, 707–731.
Berkowitz, D. (1992). Who sets the media agenda? The ability of policymakers to determine news decisions. In J. D. Kennamer (Ed.), Public opinion, the press, and public policy (pp. 81–102). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Boczkowski, P. J. & de Santos, M. (2007). When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina’s leading print and online newspapers, Political Communication 24(2), 167–180.
Boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet tweet retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter, Proceedings of HICSS-43. Kauai, HI January 5–8.
Branum, J. M. (2001). The blogging phenomenon- An overview and theoretical consideration. Final Paper for MC 5303- Theories of Mass Communication, Southwest Texas State University, TX.
Brosius, H.-B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1990). The agenda-setting function of television news: Static and dynamic views. Communication Research, 171, 183–211.
Brosius, H.-B., & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23(5), 562–581.
Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York: Peter Lang.
Bruns A. (2009). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY, USA: Peter Lang.
Bryant, J. and Zillmann, D. (2009). A retrospective and prospective look at media effects. In R. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 9–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Campbell, V., Gibson, R.Gunter, B., and Touri M. (2009). “News Blogs, Mainstream News and News Agendas”, in S. Tunney & G. Monaghan (Eds.), Web Journalism: A New Form of Citizenship, Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Chaffee, S. H., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). The end of mass communication?Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 365–379.
Collister, S. (2008). Networked Journalism or pain in the RSS?: An examination of political bloggers and media agenda-setting in the UK. Paper presented at the Politics: Web 2.0 International Conference, April 17–18, 2008.. London: Royal Holloway, University of London.
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D., 2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380.
Conway, M., & Patterson, J. R. (2008). Today’s top story? An agenda-setting and recall experiment involving television and internet news. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 24(1), 31–48.)
Cornfield, M., Carson, J., Kalis, A., & Simon, E. (2005). Buzz, blogs, and beyond: The Internet and the national discourse in the fall of 2004. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from [URL]
Dearing, W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delwiche, A. (2005). Agenda setting, opinion leadership and the world of web logs. First Monday, 10(12). Retrieved July 28, 2014, from [URL]
Dick, M. (2011). Search engine optimization in UK news production.’ Journalism Practice 51, 462–477.
Downs, A. (1972): Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle. Public Interest 281, 38–50.
Fahmy, N. (2010). Revealing the “agenda-cutting” through Egyptian blogs: An empirical study. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium on Online Journalism University of Texas, Austin. Retrieved August 1, 2014 from [URL]
Farrell, H. & Drezner, D. W. (2008). The power and the politics of blogs. Public Choice, 1341, 15–30.
Friedrich, K., Keyling, T., & Brosius, H.-B. (2016). Gatekeeping revisited. In G. Vowe & P. Henn (Eds.), Political Communication in the Online World Theoretical Approaches and Research Designs (S. 59–72). New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, B. (2007). Bollywood-Fans meeting online and offline: Filmkultur im Internet, auf Stammtischen und bei Clubbings. Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften 21, 69–84.
Gane, N., & Beer, D. (2008). New media. New York, N.Y.: Berg.
Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and Democracy (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gleason S. (2010). Harnessing social media. American Journalism Review 32(1): 6–7.
Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Leskovec, J., & Krause, A. (2010). Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, pp. 1019–1028.
Goode, L. (2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1287–1305.
Groshek, J. & Groshek, M. K. (2013). Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time.” Media and Communication, 11, 15–27.
Haake, G. , Gehrau, V., Väth, J. and Fretwurst, B. (2014). Issue definition and agenda-setting effects in communication research, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Hilton Metropole Hotel, London, 14 June. Retrieved July 22, 2014, from [URL]
Hargittai, E. (2004). The changing online landscape: From free-for-all to commercial gatekeeping. In P. Day, & D. Schuler (Eds.), Community practice in the network society: Local actions/global interaction (pp. 66–76). New York: Routledge.
Heim, K. (2013). Framing the 2008 Iowa democratic caucuses. Political blogs and second-level intermedia agenda setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(3), 500–519.
Hennessy, C.Martin, P. (2006). Blogs, the mainstream media, and the war in Iraq. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 31. Retrieved July 22, 2014, from [URL]
Hermida A. (2010). Twittering the news: the emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice 4(3), 1–12.
Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 343–356.
Herring, S., Kouper, I., Scheidt, L. A., & Wright, E. L. (2004). Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. Into the blogosphere, Into the Blogsphere, Retrieved July 20, 2014, from [URL]
Hester, J. B., and R. Gibson (2007). The Agenda-setting function of national versus local media: A time-series analysis for the issue of same-sex marriage.” Mass Communication & Society, 10 (3): 299–317.
Hestres, L. E. (2008). The Blogs of War: Online Activism, Agenda Setting and the Iraq war, paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA’s 49th Annual Convention, March 26, 2008, San Francisco, USA.
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Huck, I., Quiring, O., & Brosius, H.-B. (2009): Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda-Setting Process. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(2), 139–164.
Jönsson, A. M. & Örnebring, H. (2011) ‘User-generated content and the newsJournal of Sociology, 941, 53–78.
Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content, Journal of Communication, 641, 239–259.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Kim, S. and T. Lee (2006). New functions of Internet mediated agenda-setting: Agenda-rippling and reversed agenda-setting”. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 50 (3), 175–205.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D. K., & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 296–313.
Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 431, 100–127.
Kovach, B. & Rosensteil, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: What news people should know and the public should expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Krause, B. & Gehrau, V. (2007). Das Paradox der Medienwirkung auf Nichtnutzer. Eine Zeitreihenanalyse auf Tagesbasis zu den kurzfristigen Agenda-Setting-Effekten von Fernsehnachrichten. Publizistik, 52(2), 191–209.
Kwak H., Lee C., Park, H., and Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or news media?. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, USA, 26–30 April 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2014, from [URL]
Ku, G., Kaid, L. L., & Pfau, M. (2003). The impact of web site campaigning on traditional news media and public information processing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 528–547.
Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter. Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36.
Leavitt, A., Burchard, E., Fisher, D., & Gilbert, S. (2009). The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on Twitter. Web Ecology Project, 41, 1–18. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from [URL]
Lee, A. M., Lewis, S. C., & Powers, M. (2014). Audience clicks and news placement. A study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research, 41(4), 505–530.
Lee, J. K. (2007). The effect of the Internet on homogeneity of the media agenda: A test of the fragmentation thesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 745–760.
Lee, S. H. (2012). The end of the traditional gatekeepers, Journal of Communication, Culture & Technology, 121, 1–24.
Leino, J., Räihä, K.-J., & Finnberg, S. (2011). All the news that’s fit to read: Finding and recommending news online. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, P. Palanque, N. Nunes, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011 (Vol. 31, pp. 169–186). Heidelberg: Springer.
Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2009). Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. Paper presented at the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), Paris, France. Retrieved July 10, 2014, [URL]
Lloyd, L., Kaulgud, P., & Skiena, S. (2005). Newspapers vs. blogs: Who gets the scoop?AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs (AAAI-CAAW 2006), Stanford University, March 27–29, 2006.
Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., & Boyd, d. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 51, 1375–1405.
Maier, S. (2010). All the news fit to post? Comparing news content on the web to newspapers, television, and radio. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3/4), 548–562.
Marwick, A. & Boyd, D. (2010, July7). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from [URL]
Mathes, R. & Pfetsch, B. (1991). The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership, European Journal of Communication, 61, 33–62.
Matzat, U. (2005). Die Einbettung der Online-Interaktion in soziale Netzwerke der Offline-Welt. Möglichkeiten der sozialen Gestaltung von Online-Grupen. In M. Jäckel & M. Mai (Eds.), Online-Vergesellschaftung? Mediensoziologische Perspektiven auf neue Kommunikationstechnologien (pp. 175–199). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Maurer, M., & Holbach, T. (2015). Taking online search queries as an indicator of the public agenda: The role of public uncertainty. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
McCombs, M. E. (1997). New frontiers in agenda setting: Agendas of attributes and frames. Mass Communication Review, 24(1&2), 32–52.
McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McCombs, M. E. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557.
McCombs, M. E. (2014). Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion (2nd edition). Cambridge: Polity Press
McClellan, N. (2010). Members of congress respond to the political blogosphere. Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduated School at the University of Missouri, USA.
Meraz, S. (2007). The networked political blogosphere and mass media: Understanding how agendas are formed, framed, and transferred in the emerging new media environment. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Science, 68 (12-A).
Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707.
Meraz, S. (2011). The fight for ‘how to think’: Traditional media, social networks, and issueinterpretation. Journalism, 12(1), 107–127.
Meraz, S. and Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #egypt, The International Journal of Press/Politics XX(X) 1–29.
Mesch, G. (2007). Social diversification: a perspective for the study of social networks of adolescents offine and online. In K. I. Bildung (Ed.), Grenzenlose Cyberwelt? Zum Verhältnis von digitaler Ungleichheit und neuen Bildungszugängen für Jugendliche (pp. 105–117). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Messing, R. and Westwood, S. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online, Communication Research, 411, 1–23.
Messner, M. and Distaso, W. M. (2008). How traditional media and weblogs use each other as sources, Journalism Studies, 91, 447–463.
Metzgar, E. (2007). Blogsetting: Traditional media, agenda-setting & the blogosphere. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
Metzger, M. J. (2009). The study of media effects in the era of Internet communication. In R. Nabi, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of Media Effects (pp. 561–576). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murley, B., & Roberts, C. (2006). Biting the hand that feeds: Blogs and second-level agenda setting. Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association. January 6, Atlanta, GA.
Newman, N., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2015). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214.
Oegema, D., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Anderson, K., & Hoof, A. V. (2008). Flaming and blaming. The influence of mass media content on interactions in online discussions. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis & S. B. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 331–358). New York: Routledge.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 101, 59–79.
Papacharissi Z. (2009). The virtual sphere. New Media & Society. 4(1):9–27.
Papacharissi Z. (2010). Private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You, New York: Penguin Press.
Parmelee, J. (2013). The agenda-building function of political tweets, New Media & Society 161, 434–450.
Peters, J. (2010a). At Yahoo, using searches to steer news coverage. New York Times, July 4. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from [URL].
Peters, J. (2010b). ‘Some newspapers, tracking readers online, shift coverage.’ New York Times, September 5. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from [URL].
PEJ New Media Index (2010). Internet Access Ignites the Blogosphere, March 8–12, 2010. Retrieved February, 2016, from [URL]
Pew Research (2010). New media, old media: How blogs and social media agendas relate and differ from the traditional press. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from [URL]
Pew Research (2011a). Navigating news online: Where people go, how they get there and what lures them away. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from [URL]
Pew Research (2011b). Internet gains on television as public’s main news source. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from [URL]
Pew Research (2015). The Evolving Role of News on Twitter and Facebook. Retrieved January 3, 2015, from [URL]
Pfetsch, B., Adam S. (2011). Media agenda building in online and offline media: Comparing issues and countries. Proceedings of the 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–27 August 2011.
Piotrowski, K. (2006). Online – Offline. Soziale Netzwerke von Jugendlichen. In A. Tillmann & R. Vollbrecht (Eds.), Abenteuer Cyberspace: Jugendliche in virtuellen Welten (pp. 51–63). Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 131, pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex
Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from [URL]
Ragas, M., & Roberts, M. (2009). Agenda setting and agenda melding in an age of horizontal and vertical media: A new theoretical lens for virtual brand communities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86 (1), 45–64.
Ragas, M., Tran. H. and J. Martin (2014). Media-induced or search-driven? A study of online agenda-setting effects during the BP oil disaster, Journalism Studies, 151, 48–63.
Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. (2002). Counting on the Internet: Most find the information they seek, expect. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from [URL]
Reese, S. D. (2008). Theorizing a globalized journalism. In M. Loeffelholz & D. H. Weaver (Eds.), Global journalism research: Theories, methods, findings, future (pp. 240–252). London: Blackwell.
Regan, K. (2015). 10 Amazing Social Media Growth Stats From 2015, SocialMediaToday, August 10, 2015, from [URL] 2015-08-10/10-amazing-social-media-growth-stats-2015
Roberts, M., Wanta, W., & Dzwo, T. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29(4), 452–465.
Rogers, E. and Dearing, J. (1988). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going?”. Communication Yearbook, 111, 555–594.
Rostovtseva, N. (2009). Inter-media agenda setting role of the blogosphere: A content analysis of the Reuters photo controversy coverage during the Israel-Lebanon conflict in 2006. Thesis submitted to the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Russell, F. M., Hendricks, M. A., Choi, H., & Stephens, E. C. (2015). Who sets the news agenda on Twitter?Digital Journalism, 3(6), 925–943.
Sayre, B., Bode, L., Shah, D., Wilcox, D. and Shah, C. (2010). Agenda setting in a digital age: Tracking attention to California Proposition 8 in social media, online news, and conventional news,” Policy & Internet, 21, 7–32.
Scharkow, M., & Vogelgesang, J. (2011). Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(1), 104–113.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 491, 103–122.
Schiffer, A.]. (2006). Blogswarms and press norms: News coverage of the Downing Street memo controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 831, 494–510.
Schoenbach, K. & Weaver, D. H. (1985). Finding the unexpected: Cognitive bonding in a political campaign. In S. Kraus and R. Perloff (Eds.) Mass Media and Political Thought (pp. 157–76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Schultz, B. and Sheffer, M. L. (2010). An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication 3(2): 226–239.
Shaw, D., & McCombs, M. E. (2008). Agenda setting in the new media landscape: Two perspectives and approaches to research. Paper Presented to the Colloquium for Philip Meyer, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Shaw, D., McCombs, M. E., Weaver, D., & Hamm, B. (1999). Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2–24.
Shehata, A., & Stromback, J. (2013). Not (Yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18 (2), 234–255.
Silva, J. (2008). Interview with Maxwell McCombs. Estudos em Comunicação, the University of Navarra at Pamplona, Spain. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from [URL]
Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73.
Smith, A. and Rainie, L. (2010). 8% of online Americans use Twitter. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Retrieved August 4, 2014, from [URL]
Sweetser, K., Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society, 11(2), 197–216.
Takeshita, T. (1997). Exploring the mediaʹs roles in defining reality: From issue-agenda setting to attribute-agenda setting. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy (pp. 15–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2012). Agenda Diversity and agenda setting from 1956 to 2004. Journalism Studies, 141, 773–789.
Tandoc, E. C. (2014). Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society, 16(4), 559–575.
Tedesco, J. C. (2005). Issue and Strategy Agenda Setting in the 2004 Presidential Election: exploring the candidate–journalist relationship. Journalism Studies, 6(2), 187–201.
Tewksbury, D. (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 531, 694–710.
Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. L. (2000). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 457–479.
Thorson, E. (2008). Changing patterns of news consumption and participation. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4) , 473–489.
Tomaszeski, M. S. (2006). A baseline examination of political bloggers: Who they are, their views on the blogosphere and their influence in agenda-setting via the two-step flow hypothesis. Thesis Submitted to the Florida State University, College of Communication, Florida, FL.
Tran, H., (2014). Online agenda setting: A new frontier for theory development. In T. J. Johnson (Ed.), Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World (pp. 205–229). New York: Routledge.
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., and Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, May 23–26, 2010, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Vonbun, R., Königslöw, K. K., & Schoenbach, K. (2015). Intermedia agenda-setting in a multimedia news environment. Journalism, 1464884915595475.
Vu, N. H. N. and Gehrau, V. (2010). Agenda diffusion: An integrated model of agenda-setting and interpersonal communication, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 871, 100–116.
Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 561, 88–109.
Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567–587.
Wallsten, K. (2013). Old media, new media sources: The blogosphere’s influence on print media news coverage. International Journal of E-Politics, 4(2), 1–20.
Wanta, W. and Hu, Y-W. (1994). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 61, 225–240.
Weaver, D. (1977). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D. L. Shaw and M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American public issues (pp. 107–120). St. Paul, MN: West.
Weaver, D. (2007). Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming, Journal of Communication 571, 142–147.
Weaver, D., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2004). Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp. 257–282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Weeks, B., & Southwell, B. (2010). The symbiosis of new coverage and aggregate online search behavior: Obama, rumor, and presidential politics. Mass Communication and Society, 13(4), 341–360.
Weimann, G. (2000). Communicating Unreality: Modern Media and the Reconstruction of Reality. Los Angeles: Sage.
Weimann, G., & Brosius, H. B. (1994). Is there a two-step flow of agenda-setting?International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 6(4), 323–341.
Weimann, G., & Brosius, H. B. (2016). A new agenda for agenda-setting research in the digital era. In G. Vowe & P. Henn (Eds.), Political Communication in the Online World Theoretical Approaches and Research Designs (S. 26–44). New York: Routledge.
Weimann, G., Weiss-Blatt, N., Mengistu, G., Mazor, M., and Oren, R. (2014): Reevaluating “The End of Mass Communication?”, Mass Communication and Society (fortcoming).
Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2004). Monica and Bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gatekeeping and agenda setting in the new media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(9), 1208–1230.
Wojcieszak, M. E. (2008). Mainstream critique, critical mainstream and the new media: Reconciliation of mainstream and critical approaches of media effects studies?International Journal of Communication, 21, 354–378.
Woodly, D. (2008). New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 109–123.
Wu, Y., Atkin, D., Mou, Y., Lin, C. A. & Lau, T. (2013). Agenda Setting and Micro-blog Use: An Analysis of the Relationship between Sina Weibo and Newspaper Agendas in China, The Journal of Social Media in Society 2(2), 8–25.
Xu, Q. (2013). Social recommendation, source credibility, and recency: Effects of news cues in a social bookmarking website. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 757–775.
Zhao W. X., Jiang J., Weng J., He J., Lim E., Yan H., & Li X. (2011). Comparing Twitter and traditional media using topic models. Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval, Dublin, Ireland, 18–21 April 2011.
Zhang, X., Fuehres, H. and Gloor, P. (2011). Predicting stock market indicators through Twitter: “I hope it is not as bad as I fear”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 261, 55–62.
Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 21 (pp. 225–240). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
Chen, Xi, Scott A. Hale, David Jurgens, Mattia Samory, Ethan Zuckerman & Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
2024. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, ► pp. 2639 ff.
Maurer, Marcus & Pablo Jost
2024. Comparing Agenda-Setting Effects for the Issue of Migration Measured with Three Different Indicators of the Public Agenda. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 36:3
Tao, Yuzhou, Mark Boukes & Andreas Schuck
2024. Unpacking the Nuances of Agenda-Setting in the Online Media Environment: An Hourly-Event Approach in the Context of Chinese Economic News. Journalism Studies 25:8 ► pp. 856 ff.
Wang, Xin & Maurice Vergeer
2024. Effect of Social Media Posts on Stock Market During COVID-19 Infodemic: An Agenda Diffusion Approach. Sage Open 14:1
Zeid, Nour, Thomas Frissen & Sebastian Scherr
2024. جمال_خاشقجي# #JamalKhashoggi: Unraveling multilingual Twitter sentiment dynamics in a longitudinal comparative analysis of tweets in Arabic and English. New Media & Society 26:9 ► pp. 5529 ff.
Wagner, John K.
2023. The effect of selective exposure on agenda diversity: An experimental analysis of high-choice media environments and issue consensus. Frontiers in Political Science 4
Wang, Wilfred Yang, Gil-Soo Han & Helen Forbes-Mewett
2022. Community stakeholder and opinion formation toward end-of-life planning in Chinese community in Australia. Death Studies 46:5 ► pp. 1253 ff.
2021. Who Did the Top Media From Spain Started Following on Twitter? An Exploratory Data Analysis Case Study. American Behavioral Scientist 65:3 ► pp. 512 ff.
Maurer, Marcus
2021. Theorieansätze und Hypothesen in der Medienpädagogik: Agenda-Setting. In Handbuch Medienpädagogik, ► pp. 1 ff.
Maurer, Marcus
2022. Theorieansätze und Hypothesen in der Medienpädagogik: Agenda-Setting. In Handbuch Medienpädagogik, ► pp. 301 ff.
Maurer, Marcus
2022. Journalismus und Agenda-Setting. In Handbuch Journalismustheorien, ► pp. 1 ff.
Maurer, Marcus
2022. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. In Schlüsselwerke: Theorien (in) der Kommunikationswissenschaft, ► pp. 187 ff.
Maurer, Marcus
2024. Journalismus und Agenda-Setting. In Handbuch Journalismustheorien, ► pp. 479 ff.
2021. Shaping news waves and constructing events: Iranian journalists’ use of online platforms as sources of journalistic capital. New Media & Society 23:7 ► pp. 1936 ff.
Valencia, Ricardo J. & Derek Moscato
2021. Navigating #ObamainCuba: how Twitter mediates frames and history in public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 17:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
YAŞİN, Prof. Dr. Cem Yaşin, Muharrem CETIN, Can CENGİZ & Büşra SÖNMEZ
2021. İletişim Teknolojilerindeki Dönüşümün Gündem-Belirleme Sürecine Etkisi Üzerine Kuramsal Tartışmaların Değerlendirmesi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi 11:2 ► pp. 29 ff.
Garbuznyak, Alina
2020. New Medias Agenda: Approaches to Research Methods. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism 9:4 ► pp. 627 ff.
Silva, David E., Myiah J. Hutchens, Rebecca R. Donaway & Michael A. Beam
2018. 300 Million Clicks and Political Engagement via Facebook in the 2016 American Presidential Election: How Online Activity Changes Across Time and Sources. Mass Communication and Society 21:6 ► pp. 742 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.