Online agenda-setting research
Challenges and dilemmas
Agenda-setting research has been performed for more than four decades, both in traditional and online media, and the tools employed for this task have been very much accepted by media researchers around the world. Nevertheless, analysis of the public agenda in new media, particularly across social networks, requires re-thinking these same tools, which creates a series of methodological and theoretical challenges. The present paper seeks to illuminate these challenges and propose possible solutions for some of them.
Article outline
- Agenda-setting theory
- Agenda-setting theory in the age of new media
- Current challenges facing agenda-setting researchers
- Defining the boundaries of the online public
- What’s on the online public agenda? Evaluating the public agenda in the online public sphere
- Conceptualizing and measuring salience
- Relying on automatic monitoring systems
- Putting a sample together
- Defining units of time
- Interactions among and mutual influences among different media outlets
- Inter-source contamination
- Conclusions
-
References
References (60)
References
Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). Online media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 251, 345–365.
Boczkowski, P. J., & de Santos, M. (2007). When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina’s leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication 241, 167–180.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 151, 662–679.
Boynton, G. R., & Richardson Jr., J. W. (2016). Agenda-Setting in the twenty-first century. New Media & Society 181, 1916–1934.
Brosius, H. B., & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two- step flow. Communication Research, 231, 561–580.
Buzzilla | Brand Monitoring, Social Media Analysis and Research. (n.d.). Retrieved March 24, 2017, from [URL]
Chaffee, S. H., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). The end of mass communication? Mass Communication and Society, 41, 365–379.
Chen, W., Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2002). The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In B. Wellman, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 74–113). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, R., & Banning, S. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 831, 313–328.
Coleman, R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & Weaver, D. (2009). Agenda-setting. In T. Hanitzsch, & K. Wahl-Jorgensen (Eds.), Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York, NY: Routledge, 147–160.
Cooper, M., & Kimmelman, G. (2001). The digital divide confronts the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Economic reality versus public policy. In B. Compaine. (Ed). The Digital divide – Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 200–221). Boston, MA: MIT.
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gitlin, T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes, & J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 168–174). London, UK: Routledge.
Guo, L. (2013). Toward the third level of agenda-setting theory: A network agenda- setting model. In T. Johnson (Ed.), Agenda setting in a 2.0 world: New agendas in communication (pp. 112–133). New York, NY: Routledge.
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda-setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 181, 557–576.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and evolution of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4).
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Agenda-setting and priming in a television age. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, T. J., & Perlmutter, D. D. (2010). Introduction: The Facebook election. Mass Communication and Society, 131, 554–559.
Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today’s Internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, J. K., & Coleman, R. (2014). Testing generational, life cycle, and period effects of age on agenda-setting. Mass Communication and Society, 171, 3–25.
Lee, B., Lancendorfer, K. M., & Lee, K. J. (2005). Agenda-setting and the Internet: The intermedia influence of Internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea, Asian Journal of Communication, 151, 57–71.
Lippmann, W. (1922). The mental age of Americans. The New Republic, 321, 297–298.
Madhavan, J., Afanasiev, L., Antova, L., & Halevy, A. (2009). Harnessing the deep web: Present and future. Retrieved from [URL].
Malka, V., Ariel, Y., & Avidar, R. (2015). Fighting, worrying and sharing: Operation ‘Protective Edge’ as the first WhatsApp war. Media, War, and Conflict, 81, 329–344.
McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass public and the opinion
. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the Agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda-setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum.
McCombs, M., Holbert, L., Kiousis, S., & Wanta, W. (2011). The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2009). How the news shapes our civic agenda. In: B. Jennings, & M. B. Beth Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–16.
McCombs, M. E. (2005). A look at agenda setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 61, 543–557.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 361, 176–187.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication 431, 58–67.
Möller, K. (2010). Sense-making and agenda construction in emerging business networks – How to direct radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 391, 361–371.
Napoli, P. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Neuendorf, A. K. (2017). The content analysis guidebook 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 641, 193–214.
Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from [URL]
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 491, 103–122.
Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 31, 297–316.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 571, 9–20.
Schober, M. F., Pasek, J., Guggenheim, L., Lampe, C., & Conrad, F. G. (2016). Social media analyses for social measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 801, 180–211.
Shaw, D., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J. (1999). Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 111, 2–24.
Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda-setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society 111, 197–216.
Tarbush, B., & Teytelboym, A. (2012). Homophily in online social networks. Internet and network economics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 512–518.
Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In ICWSM ’14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Tuten, T. L., Solomon, M. R. (2015). Social media marketing 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London, UK: Routledge.
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 641, 296–316.
Weaver, D. H., & Choi, J. (2014). The media agenda: Who (or What) sets it? in K. Kenski, & K. H. Jamieson. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of political ommunication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, .
Weaver, D., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2004). Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 257–282.
Weimann, G., Brosius, H. B. (2016). A new agenda for agenda-setting research in the digital era. In G. Vowe, & P. Henn. (Eds.). Political communication in the online world: Theoretical approaches and research designs (pp. 26–44). London, UK: Routledge.
Woodly, D. (2008). New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice 1341, 109–123.
Woolley, J. K., Limperos, A. M., & Oliver, M. B. (2010). The 2008 presidential election, 2.0: A content analysis of user-generated political Facebook groups. Mass Communication and Society 131, 631–652.
Wu, H. D., & Coleman, R. (2009). Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 861, 775–789.
Zerfos, P., Cho, J., & Ntoulas, A. (2005). Downloading textual hidden web content through keyword queries. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’05) (pp. 100–109).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Sassoni-Bar Lev, Oshrat & Ruth Avidar
2023.
‘God forbid we’d be infected’: framing and counter-framing of the ‘Corona Cruise Ship’ in Israeli media.
The Journal of International Communication 29:2
► pp. 213 ff.
Ariel, Yaron, Vered Elishar Malka, Dana Weimann Saks & Ruth Avidar
Jansen, A. Severin, Beatrice Eugster, Michaela Maier & Silke Adam
2019.
Who Drives the Agenda: Media or Parties? A Seven-Country Comparison in the Run-Up to the 2014 European Parliament Elections.
The International Journal of Press/Politics 24:1
► pp. 7 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.