Cover not available
Article published In:
The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 3:2 (2019) ► pp.139–164

Agendamelding

How audiences meld agendas in Iran

 | Kennesaw State University
The present study tests the agendamelding theory, which posits that public agenda is the result of a process whereby audiences “meld” agendas from various media along with their personal agenda to form a coherent picture of society. To that end, the contributions of the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda, and the personal agenda of Iranian audiences to their public agenda are independently measured and compared against values predicted by theory. The findings indicate a strong social media agenda-setting effect in Iran (ρ = .83, p < .05) and a weak, non-significant traditional media agenda-setting effect (ρ = .28, p = .48). On average, actual contributions closely mirror values predicted by theory, suggesting that agendamelding is a viable theory for studying the audience-media relationship.
Keywords: agenda setting, agendamelding, traditional media, social media, vertical, horizontal, audience, Iran, nuclear
Article outline
  • Agendamelding
  • Vertical and horizontal media
  • Agenda Community Attraction (ACA)
  • The Iran Nuclear Deal
  • Method
    • Challenges of conducting surveys in Iran
    • Survey sample
    • Survey measures
    • Content analysis
      • Traditional/vertical media
      • Social/horizontal media
  • Analysis and results
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • References
Published online: 25 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18010.min
References (70)
References
Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 781, 53–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, R. A. (1964). The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of social communication. American Psychologist, 191, 319–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBC. (2014, April 9). Khamenei: Iran will never give up its nuclear programme. BBC. Retrieved from [URL]
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (2008). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life (Updated ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1985)Google Scholar
Bischoff, C. (2017, September 18). “He’s doing poorly,” says wife of Princeton student jailed in Iran. Retrieved from [URL]
Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States: #Ferguson. American Ethnologist, 421, 4–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brosius, H.-B., & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda: Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 231, 561–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruno, G. (2009, July 22). The media landscape in Iran. Retrieved from [URL]
CNN. (2017, October 20). Iran hostage crisis fast facts. Retrieved from [URL]
Cobb, R., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, R., Ross, J.-K., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process. The American Political Science Review, 701, 126–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R., & McCombs, M. E. (2007). The young and agenda-less? Exploring age-related differences in agenda setting on the youngest generation, baby boomers, and the civic generation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 841, 495–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Diddi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 501, 193–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillman Carpentier, F. R. (2014). Agenda setting and priming effects based on information presentation: Revisiting accessibility as a mechanism explaining agenda setting and priming. Mass Communication and Society, 171, 531–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eberle, M., Eager, E. A., & Peirce, J. (2015). How infectious was #deflategate? Spora: A Journal of Biomathematics, 11, 28–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eltagouri, M. (2018, January 3). Tens of thousands of people have protested in Iran. Here’s why. Retrieved from [URL]
Erdbrink, T., & Branigin, W. (2009, November 4). Iran’s supreme leader warns against negotiating with U.S. Washington Post. Retrieved from [URL]
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghaemi, H. (2014). Voices from Iran: Strong support for the nuclear negotiations. Tehran, Iran: International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran. Retrieved from [URL]
Gladstone, R. (2017, October 5). What is the Iran nuclear deal? And why does Trump hate it? Retrieved January 25, 2018, from [URL]
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory (pp. 3–17). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Hohman, Z. P., & Rivera, J. E. (2008). Why do people join groups? Three motivational accounts from social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1269–1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Internet World Stats. (2017). Usage and population statistics. Retrieved from [URL]
Iran Const. art. 241.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2006). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1955)Google Scholar
Kessler, G. (2006, June 18). In 2003, U.S. spurned Iran’s offer of dialogue. Retrieved from [URL]
Landler, M. (2018, May 9). Trump abandons Iran nuclear deal he long scorned. New York Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
LaRose, R. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory, 201, 194–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (2002). Is online buying out of control? Electronic commerce and consumer self-regulation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 461, 549–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 481, 358–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaRose, R., Lin, C. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2003). Unregulated internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 51, 225–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., & Riffe, D. (2017). Who sets the corporate social responsibility agenda in the news media? Unveiling the agenda-building process of corporations and a monitoring group. Public Relations Review, 431, 293–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., & McCombs, M. E. (1998). Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 101, 335–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 61, 543–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 741, 703–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 171, 781–802. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 11, 131–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G., & Brown, J. R. (2000). The television audience: A revised perspective. In P. Marris & S. Thornham (Eds.), Media studies: A reader (2nd ed., pp. 438–451). New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Moeller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., Irion, K., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media. Info, 18(6), 26–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obama, B. (2015, August 5). Remarks by the president on the Iran nuclear deal [Transcript]. Retrieved from [URL]
Ragas, M. W., & Roberts, M. S. (2009). Agenda setting and agenda melding in an age of horizontal and vertical media: A new theoretical lens for virtual brand communities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 861, 45–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sciolino, E. (2008, July 20). Nuclear talks with Iran end in a deadlock. Retrieved from [URL]
Shahidi, H. (2006). From mission to profession: Journalism in Iran, 1979–2004. Iranian Studies, 391, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Iranian journalism and the law in the twentieth century. Iranian Studies, 411, 739–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. L., Hamm, B. J., & Terry, T. (2006). Vertical vs. horizontal media: Using agenda-setting and audience agenda-melding to create public information strategies in the emerging papyrus society. Military Review, 86(6), 13–25.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M. E., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J. (1999). Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 111, 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. L., Minooie, M., Cole, R., & Vargo, C. J. (2016). The agenda setting in the digital age: How we use media to monitor civic life and reframe community. Jordan Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 125–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. L., Terry, T. C., & Minooie, M. (2015). Military communication strategies based on how audiences meld media and agendas. Military Review, 95(6), 16–28.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Agenda diversity and agenda setting from 1956 to 2004: What are the trends over time? Journalism Studies, 141, 773–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 131, 110–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vargo, C. J. (2011, August). Twitter as public salience: An agenda-setting analysis. Paper presented at AEJMC Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.
Vargo, C. J., Basilaia, E., & Shaw, D. L. (2015). Event vs. issue: Twitter reflections of major news, a case study. In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, & J. Schulz (Eds.), Studies in Media and Communications: Vol 9. Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 215–239). Bingley, England: Emerald Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 201, 2028–2049. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vishwanath, A. (2015). Habitual Facebook use and its impact on getting deceived on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 201, 83–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, D. H. (1977). Political issues and voters’ need for orientation. In D. L. Shaw & M. E. McCombs, The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 107–120). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M. E., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Weimann, G., & Brosius, H.-B. (1994). Is there a two-step flow of agenda-setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 61, 323–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 831, 1281–1297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Minooie, Milad, J. Benjamin Taylor & Chris J. Vargo
2023. Agendamelding and COVID-19: the dance of horizontal and vertical media in a pandemic. Frontiers in Political Science 5 DOI logo
Minooie, Milad
2021. A world of two agendas. The Agenda Setting Journal 5:2 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Su, Linsen & Xigen Li
2021. Perceived agenda-setting effect in international context: Impact of media coverage on American audience’s perception of China. International Communication Gazette 83:7 ► pp. 708 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.