Article published in:
Fifty years of agenda-setting research: Volume I
Edited by Chris J. Vargo
[The Agenda Setting Journal 2:2] 2018
► pp. 105123
References

References

Alkazemi, M. F., & Wanta, W.
(2018) The effect of oil prices on the media agenda: A model of agenda building. Newspaper Research Journal, 39, 232–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beam, R. A., & Meeks, L.
(2011) So many stories, so little time. In W. Lowrey & P. Gade (Eds.), Changing the news: The forces shaping journalism in uncertain times (pp. 230–248). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S.
(2018) The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33, 122–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camaj, L.
(2014) Need for orientation, selective exposure, and attribute agenda-setting effects. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 689–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B.
(2001) A theory of presidents’ public agenda setting. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13, 183–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F.
(2016) Botornot: A system to evaluate social bots. In J. Bourdeau (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 273–274). Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freelon, D.
(2014) On the interpretation of digital trace data in communication and social computing research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(1), 59–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, A.
(2016) Hashtag journalism: The pros and cons to covering twitter’s trending topics. Columbia Journalism Review.
Guo, L., Chen, Y. N. K., Vu, H., Wang, Q., Aksamit, R., Guzek, D., … & McCombs, M.
(2015) Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland: A transnational network agenda-setting study. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 343–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guo, L., & Vargo, C.
(2015) The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) “Fake news” and emerging online media ecosystem: An integrated intermedia agenda-setting analysis of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Communication Research. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M.
(2013) Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 154–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kümpel, A. S., Karnowski, V., & Keyling, T.
(2015) News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social media + society, 1(2), 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S.
(2010) What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In M. Rappa & P. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591–600). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Xu, W.
(2018) The more attacks, the more retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s agenda setting on Twitter. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 201–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. Y., & Riffe, D.
(2017) Who sets the corporate social responsibility agenda in the news media? Unveiling the agenda-building process of corporations and a monitoring group. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 293–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, M.
(2013) How partisan media polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, W.
(1922) Public opinion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lough, K.
(2018) Intermedia visual agenda setting: Comparing wire service top photo distribution to what makes the front page. The Agenda Setting Journal, 2, 25–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T.
(2017) President Donald Trump: A case study of spectacular power. The Political Quarterly, 88(4), 612–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maher, T. M.
(2001) Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting? In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 99–110). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N.
(2015) The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M.
(2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
(1993) The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H.
(2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 781–802. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Min, Y., Ghanem, S. I., & Evatt, D.
(2007) Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‘MIP’ question in agenda-setting research: A methodological study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 221–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newton, J.
(2013) The burden of visual truth: The role of photojournalism in mediating reality. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasek, J., & Dailey, J.
(2019) Why don’t tweets consistently track elections? Lessons from linking Twitter and survey data streams. In T. Stroud & S. McGregor (Eds.), Digital discussions: How big data informs political communication (pp. 68–93). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peter, J.
(2003) Country characteristics as contingent conditions of agenda setting: The moderating influence of polarized elite opinion. Communication Research, 30, 683–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J.
(2017) Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J.
(2017) Social network analysis (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J.
(1999) Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 2–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. L., Minooie, M., Akiat, D. & Vargo, C.
in press). Agendamelding: How we use digital media to create personal community. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Skewes, E.
(2018) Time delays are not enough; Media must call out lies. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(2), 97–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trump, D. J., & Schwartz, T.
(2009) Trump: The art of the deal. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L.
(2017) Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online US news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 1031–1055. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L. & Amazeen, A.
(2017) The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society. 20, 2028–2049. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L.
(2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64, 296–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weimann, G., & Brosius, H. B.
(2015) A new agenda for agenda-setting research in the digital era. In G. Vowe & P. Henn (Eds.), Political communication in the online world: Theoretical approaches and research designs (pp. 26–44). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. H., Zhu, J. H., & Willnat, L.
(1992) The bridging function of interpersonal communication in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 856–867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J. H.
(1992) Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 825–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Blankenship, Justin C. & Chris J. Vargo
2021. The Effect of Corporate Media Ownership on the Depth of Local Coverage and Issue Agendas: A Computational Case Study of Six Sinclair TV Station Websites. Electronic News 15:3-4  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.