What to think about
The applicability of agenda-settings in a social media context
This study examines how agenda setting works on social media in the United States. Unlike previous platform
studies, this research seeks to examine not just if, but also how agenda setting works in a social media setting. Three areas were
tested for their effect on issue salience: repetition, story order, and endorsement. More than 360 U.S. participants viewed
variations of a mock Facebook feed and answered questions about issue importance. Using issue importance as the dependent variable
and repetition, story order, and endorsement as the independent variables, three hypotheses were tested. One hypothesis had the
effect predicted: Increased repetition of a news story topic did influence participants’ perception that the news story topic was
important. Additional items were tested as covariates. Gender, and ethnicity had a significant influence on perceived story
importance. The results of this study indicate that agenda setting on social media occurs through repetition. Implications are
explored.
Article outline
- Literature review
- Theory development
- Differences among platforms
- Research related to social media
- Salience through repetition
- Visual hierarchy
- Endorsement
- Method
- Pilot test
- Design
- Measures
- Demographic data
- Hypothesis testing
- Discussion
- Conclusion
-
References
References (56)
References
Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the “new” news patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29(2), 180–207.
Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F. (2010). Now Tweet This How News Organizations Use Twitter. Electronic News, 4(4), 218–235.
Benesch, C. (2012). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in news consumption. Journal of Media Economics, 25(3), 147–167.
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
Brooks, B., Kennedy, G., Moen, D. R., & Ranly, D. (2010). Telling the Story: The Convergence of Print, Broadcast and Online Media (Fourth). Bedford St. Martin.
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter: New methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 801–814.
Cohen, B. (1963). The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
comScore Ranks the Top 50 U.S. Digital Media Properties for February 2016. (2016, March 21). Retrieved December 16, 2016, from [URL]
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical Power Analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101.
Conway, B. (2015, February 27). Why do we care about the colour of the dress? The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL]
Conway, M., & Patterson, J. R. (2008). Today’s Top Story? An Agenda-Setting and Recall Experiment Involving Television and Internet News. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 24(1).
Funkhouser, G. R. (1973). The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(1), 62–75.
Gebel, M. (2019, February 4). In 15 years Facebook has amassed 2.3 billion users – more than followers of Christianity. Retrieved July 9, 2019, from Business Insider website: [URL]
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2011). Hit, Link, Like and Share. Organizing the social and the fabric of the web in a Like economy. (Vol. 241, p. 25). Paper presented at the DMI mini-conference.
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 1461444812472322.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from [URL]
Graber, D. A. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. University Press of Amer.
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 815–824.
Hess, A. (2015, February 27). How One Dress United the Internet. Slate. Retrieved from [URL]
Hong, S. (2012). Online news on Twitter: Newspapers’ social media adoption and their online readership. Information Economics and Policy, 24(1), 69–74.
Ingram, Matthew. (2015, August 18). Facebook now drives more traffic to media sites than Google. Fortune. [URL]
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: agenda setting and priming in a television age. News That Matters: Agenda-Setting and Priming in a Television Age.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Johnson, B. K. (2014). Selective Exposure for Better or Worse: Its Mediating Role for Online News’ Impact on Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 184–196.
Kulwin, N. (2016, February 18). Why BuzzFeed Is “All-In” on Facebook Instant Articles, and Why the New York Times Is Not (Video). Retrieved January 19, 2017, from [URL]
Lippmann, W. (1946). Public opinion. Transaction Publishers. Retrieved from [URL]
Maier, S. (2010). All the news fit to post? Comparing news content on the web to newspapers, television, and radio. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 548–562.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media’s agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14(4), 433–443.
McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.John Wiley & Sons.
Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707.
Meraz, S. (2011a). The fight for ‘how to think’: Traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation. Journalism, 12(1), 107–127.
Meraz, S. (2011b). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176–194.
Meraz, S. (2014). Media Agenda Setting in a Competitive and Hostile Environment. In Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication. Routledge.
Messner, M., & DiStaso, M. W. (2008). The source cycle: How traditional media and weblogs use each other as sources. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 447–463.
Mitchell, A., Stocking, G., & Matsa, K. E. (2016, May 5). Long-Form Reading Shows Signs of Life in Our Mobile News World. Retrieved May 9, 2016, from [URL]
Mondak, J. J., & Anderson, M. R. (2004). The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 492–512.
News consumption among African Americans and Hispanics. (2014, September 16). Retrieved July 25, 2019, from American Press Institute website: [URL]
Owen, L. H. (2015, November 30). “Why not be all the way in?” How publishers are using Facebook Instant Articles. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from [URL]
Perrin, A. (2015, October 8). Social Media Usage: 2005–2015. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from [URL]
Pew Research Center. (2004, June 8). Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey: Online News Audience Larger, More Diverse. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from [URL]
Roth, S. P., Tuch, A. N., Mekler, E. D., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2013). Location matters, especially for non-salient features–An eye-tracking study on the effects of web object placement on different types of websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), 228–235.
Scacco, J. M., & Muddiman, A. (2016). Investigating the Influence of “Clickbait” News Headlines. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from Center for Media Engagement website: [URL]
Schiffer, A. J. (2006). Blogswarms and press norms: News coverage of the Downing Street memo controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(3), 494–510.
Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. E. (1977). The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press. West Group.
Shearer, E., & Gottfried, J. (2018, September 10). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2018 | Pew Research Center. Retrieved June 14, 2019, from [URL]
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge. Retrieved from [URL].
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.
Stelter, B. (2008, March 27). Finding Political News Online, the Young Pass It On. The New York Times. [URL]
Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press on Demand. Retrieved from [URL].
Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52–72.
Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. L. (2000). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 457–479.
Tran, H. (2013). Online Agenda Setting: A New Frontier for Theory Development. In Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New agendas in communication. Routledge.
Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567–587.
Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience Need for Orientation and Media Effects. Communication Research, 7(3), 361–373.
Westbrook, R. B. (1993). An Innocent Abroad? John Dewey and International Politics. Ethics & International Affairs, 7(1), 203–221.
Wong, D. (2013, December 10). [Report] Facebook Referrals Skyrocket: up 170% in past year. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from [URL]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Kim, Changsook, Jung Kun Pae & Wansoo Lee
2023.
What and How Do Korean Newspaper Columns Cover? : A Content Analysis of 6 Governments with a Focusing on Media Constructionism.
Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 67:4
► pp. 158 ff.
Ariel, Yaron, Vered Elishar Malka, Dana Weimann Saks & Ruth Avidar
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.