Why do politicians react to some stories in the news and ignore others? We attempt to answer this question by
integrating the micro-level politician perspective with a macro-level country approach. Using a unique experimental approach, we
test when politicians in the Netherlands and Switzerland (N = 80) take political action based on a (fictional)
news report. We find that all politicians react more to negative coverage, but not if the information is merely presented as
investigative reporting. Results also reveal a systematic variation that we ascribe to two key differences in the electoral
systems. In The Netherlands, with its large single voting district, politicians react to news reports covering issues they are
specialized in. In Switzerland, where between-party competition is more important, politicians are more likely to capitalize on
the party’s profile. Overall, this study shows when and how politicians react to news coverage also depends on the institutional
context.
(2017) Media motivation, political systems, and the nature of elite rhetoric. Political Communication, 34(3), 385–403.
Andeweg, R. B., & Irwin, G. A.
(2014) Governance and politics of the Netherlands. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andeweg, R. B., & Thomassen, J.
(2011) Pathways to party unity: Sanctions, loyalty, homogeneity and division of labour in the Dutch parliament. Party Politics, 17(5), 655–672.
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., Lindstädt, R., & Vander Wielen, R. J.
(2016) The influence of news media on political elites: Investigating strategic responsiveness in Congress. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 5–29.
Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T.
(2015) Factorial survey experiments (Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Bakker, P., & Scholten, O.
(2014) Communicatiekaart van Nederland: overzicht van media en communicatie [Communication map of the Netherlands: Overview of the media and communication]. Amsterdam: Adfo Groep.
Bartels, L. M.
(1993) Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 267–285.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D.
(2009) Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd edition). University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S.
(2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731.
Church, C. H., & Vatter, A.
(2009) Opposition in consensual Switzerland: A short but significant experiment. Government and Opposition, 44(04), 412–437.
Daalder, H.
(1971) On building consociational nations: the cases of the Netherlands and Switzerland. International Social Science Journal, 23(9), 14–31.
Dalmus, C., Hänggli, R., & Bernhard, L.
(2017) The charm of salient issues? Parties’ strategic behavior in press releases. In P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Eds.), How political actors use the media. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 187–205.
(2011) Experimental designs and their recent advances in set-up, data interpretation, and analytical applications. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 56(2), 141–158.
Gans, H. J.
(1979) Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Graber, D. A.
(2006) Mass Media & American Politics (7th dr.). Washington DC: CQ Press.
Green-Pedersen, C.
(2010) Bringing parties into parliament. The development of parliamentary activities in Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(3), 347–369.
Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R.
(2010) The political conditionality of mass media influence: when do parties follow mass media attention?British Journal of Political Science, 40(03), 663–677.
(2004) Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helfer, L.
(2016) Media effects on politicians: An individual-level political agenda-setting experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–252.
Herbst, S.
(1998) Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Hix, S.
(2002) Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 688–698.
Hug, S., & Martin, D.
(2012) How electoral systems affect MPs’ positions. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 192–200.
Kepplinger, H. M.
(2007) Reciprocal effects: Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(2), 3–23.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Walter, A. S.
(2014) News, discussion, and associative issue ownership: Instability at the micro level versus stability at the macro level. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 226–245.
Knudsen, E., & Johannesson, M. P.
(2018) Beyond the Limits of Survey Experiments: How Conjoint Designs Advance Causal Inference in Political Communication Research. Political Communication, 36(2), 259–271.
Kriesi, H., & Trechsel, A. H.
(2008) The politics of Switzerland: Continuity and change in a consensus democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lachat, R.
(2014) Issue ownership and the vote: The effects of associative and competence ownership on issue voting. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(4), 727–740.
Landerer, N.
(2014) Opposing the government but governing the audience? Exploring the differential mediatization of parliamentary actors in Switzerland. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 304–320.
Livingstone, S.
(2003) On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477–500.
Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S.
(2016) Personalised parliamentary behaviour without electoral incentives: the case of the Netherlands. West European Politics, 39(4), 778–799.
Lüthi, R.
(1996) Die Wirkung von institutionellen Reformen dargestellt am Beispiel der Reform des Kommissionensystems der Schweizerischen Bundesversammlung von 1991 [The impact of institutional reforms illustrated by the reform of the committee system of the Swiss federal assembly 1991]. Swiss Political Science Review, 2(2), 1–32.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
(1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
Midtbø, T., Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P., & Christensen, D. A.
(2014) Do the media set the agenda of Parliament or is it the opposite? Agenda interactions between MPs and mass media. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depauw (Red.), Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments (pp. 188–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newman, N.; Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Kleis Nielsen, R.
(2018) Digital News Report 2018. Oxford: Reuters Institute.
Patzelt, W. J.
(1999) What can an individual MP do in German parliamentary politics?The Journal of Legislative Studies, 5(3–4), 23–52.
Petrocik, J. R.
(1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.
Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J.
(2003) Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 599–626.
Pritchard, D. L.
(1992) The news media and public policy agendas. In D. Kennamer (Red.), Public opinion, the press and public policy (pp. 103–112). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Protess, D. L., Cook, F. L., Curtin, T. R., Gordon, M. T., Leff, D. R., McCombs, M. E., & Miller, P.
(1987) The impact of investigative reporting on public opinion and policymaking targeting toxic waste. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(2), 166–185.
Sauer, C., Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Liebig, S.
(2011) The Application of Factorial Surveys in General Population Samples: The Effects of Respondent Age and Education on Response Times and Response Consistency. Survey Research Methods, 5(3).
Sellers, P.
(2010) Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sevenans, J.
(2017) The Media’s Informational Function in Political Agenda-Setting Processes. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(2), 223–243.
Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Epping, G. J.
(2016) How political elites process information from the news. The cognitive mechanisms behind behavioral political agenda-setting effects. Political Communication, 33(4), 605–627.
Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Vos, D.
(2015) Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–7.
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P.
(2009) Media Gatekeeping. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Red.), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (2nd dr., pp. 75–89). New York: Routledge.
Soroka, S., & McAdams, S.
(2015) News, Politics, and Negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22.
Stokes, D. E.
(1963) Spatial models of party competition. The American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377.
Strøm, K.
(1998) Parliamentary committees in European democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 21–59.
Strömbäck, J.
(2008) Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.
Thesen, G.
(2012) When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389.
Traber, D., Hug, S., & Sciarini, P.
(2014) Party Unity in the Swiss Parliament: The Electoral Connection. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(2), 193–215.
Van Aelst, P., Brants, K., Praag, P. V., Vreese, D., Nuytemans, M., & Van Dalen, A.
(2008) The fourth estate as superpower? An empirical study on perceptions of media power in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 9(4), 494–511.
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S.
(2016) Political agenda setting by the mass media: ten years of research, 2005–2015. In N. Zahariadis (Red.), Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting (pp. 157–179). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Van Holsteyn, J. J. M., & Andeweg, R. B.
(2012) Tweede Orde Personalisering: Voorkeurstemmen in Nederland. Res Publica, 54(2), 163–191.
Van Vonno, C.
(2016) Achieving Party Unity. A Sequential Approach to Why MPs Act in Concert. (Doctoral Thesis). Universiteit Leiden, Leiden.
Vatter, A.
(2008) Vom Extremtyp zum Normalfall? Die schweizerische Konsensusdemokratie im Wandel: Eine Re-Analyse von Lijpharts Studie für die Schweiz von 1997 bis 2007 [From an extreme type to a normal case? The Swiss consensus democracy in change: a re-analysis of Lijphart’s study of Switzerland from 1997 to 2007]. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(1), 1–47.
Vesa, J., Blomberg, H., & Kroll, C.
(2015) Minimal and Massive! Politicians’ Views on the Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power Revisited. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 279–296.
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S.
(2010) When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3).
Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P.
(2006) The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.
Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., … Tresch, A.
(2016) Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 283–301.
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Nuytemans, M.
(2009) Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication, 26(2), 153–172.
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M.
(2008) The mass media’s political agenda-setting power. Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836.
Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R.
(2013) A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192.
Zoizner, A., Sheafer, T., & Walgrave, S.
(2017) How Politicians’ Attitudes and Goals Moderate Political Agenda Setting by the Media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(4), 431–449.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Boon, Jan, Jan Wynen, Walter Daelemans, Jens Lemmens & Koen Verhoest
2023. Agencies on the parliamentary radar: Exploring the relations between media attention and parliamentary attention for public agencies using machine learning methods. Public Administration
Butler, Chris & Barbara Vis
2023. Heuristics and policy responsiveness: a research agenda. European Political Science 22:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Huber, Lena Maria, Anita Bodlos, Elisabeth Graf & Thomas M Meyer
2022. Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda. Party Politics 28:2 ► pp. 365 ff.
Meyer, Thomas M. & Markus Wagner
2021. Issue Engagement Across Members of Parliament: The Role of Issue Specialization and Party Leadership. Legislative Studies Quarterly 46:3 ► pp. 653 ff.
Wonneberger, Anke & Rens Vliegenthart
2021. Agenda-Setting Effects of Climate Change Litigation: Interrelations Across Issue Levels, Media, and Politics in the Case of Urgenda Against the Dutch Government. Environmental Communication 15:5 ► pp. 699 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
