Article published In:
Mass Media Effects and the Political Agenda: Assessing its Scope and Conditions
Edited by Ana Maria Belchior, Peter Van Aelst, José Santana-Pereira and Patrick Merle
[The Agenda Setting Journal 4:1] 2020
► pp. 88108
References (66)
References
Amsalem, E., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Media motivation, political systems, and the nature of elite rhetoric. Political Communication, 34(3), 385–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, R. B., & Irwin, G. A. (2014). Governance and politics of the Netherlands. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, R. B., & Thomassen, J. (2011). Pathways to party unity: Sanctions, loyalty, homogeneity and division of labour in the Dutch parliament. Party Politics, 17(5), 655–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., Lindstädt, R., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2016). The influence of news media on political elites: Investigating strategic responsiveness in Congress. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T. (2015). Factorial survey experiments (Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P., & Scholten, O. (2014). Communicatiekaart van Nederland: overzicht van media en communicatie [Communication map of the Netherlands: Overview of the media and communication]. Amsterdam: Adfo Groep.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 267–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd edition). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, C. H., & Vatter, A. (2009). Opposition in consensual Switzerland: A short but significant experiment. Government and Opposition, 44(04), 412–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daalder, H. (1971). On building consociational nations: the cases of the Netherlands and Switzerland. International Social Science Journal, 23(9), 14–31.Google Scholar
Dalmus, C., Hänggli, R., & Bernhard, L. (2017). The charm of salient issues? Parties’ strategic behavior in press releases. In P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Eds.), How political actors use the media. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 187–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Dejaegher, B., & Vander Heyden, Y. (2011). Experimental designs and their recent advances in set-up, data interpretation, and analytical applications. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 56(2), 141–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, D. A. (2006). Mass Media & American Politics (7th dr.). Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2010). Bringing parties into parliament. The development of parliamentary activities in Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(3), 347–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: when do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(03), 663–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunst, R. F., & Mason, R. L. (2009). Fractional factorial design. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 1(2), 234–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L. (2016). Media effects on politicians: An individual-level political agenda-setting experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. (2002). Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 688–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hug, S., & Martin, D. (2012). How electoral systems affect MPs’ positions. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 192–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kepplinger, H. M. (2007). Reciprocal effects: Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(2), 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Walter, A. S. (2014). News, discussion, and associative issue ownership: Instability at the micro level versus stability at the macro level. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 226–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, E., & Johannesson, M. P. (2018). Beyond the Limits of Survey Experiments: How Conjoint Designs Advance Causal Inference in Political Communication Research. Political Communication, 36(2), 259–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., & Trechsel, A. H. (2008). The politics of Switzerland: Continuity and change in a consensus democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lachat, R. (2014). Issue ownership and the vote: The effects of associative and competence ownership on issue voting. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(4), 727–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landerer, N. (2014). Opposing the government but governing the audience? Exploring the differential mediatization of parliamentary actors in Switzerland. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 304–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S. (2016). Personalised parliamentary behaviour without electoral incentives: the case of the Netherlands. West European Politics, 39(4), 778–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüthi, R. (1996). Die Wirkung von institutionellen Reformen dargestellt am Beispiel der Reform des Kommissionensystems der Schweizerischen Bundesversammlung von 1991 [The impact of institutional reforms illustrated by the reform of the committee system of the Swiss federal assembly 1991]. Swiss Political Science Review, 2(2), 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Midtbø, T., Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P., & Christensen, D. A. (2014). Do the media set the agenda of Parliament or is it the opposite? Agenda interactions between MPs and mass media. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depauw (Red.), Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments (pp. 188–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, N.; Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2018). Digital News Report 2018. Oxford: Reuters Institute.Google Scholar
Patzelt, W. J. (1999). What can an individual MP do in German parliamentary politics? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 5(3–4), 23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 599–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. L. (1992). The news media and public policy agendas. In D. Kennamer (Red.), Public opinion, the press and public policy (pp. 103–112). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Protess, D. L., Cook, F. L., Curtin, T. R., Gordon, M. T., Leff, D. R., McCombs, M. E., & Miller, P. (1987). The impact of investigative reporting on public opinion and policymaking targeting toxic waste. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(2), 166–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauer, C., Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Liebig, S. (2011). The Application of Factorial Surveys in General Population Samples: The Effects of Respondent Age and Education on Response Times and Response Consistency. Survey Research Methods, 5(3).Google Scholar
Sellers, P. (2010). Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sevenans, J. (2017). The Media’s Informational Function in Political Agenda-Setting Processes. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(2), 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Epping, G. J. (2016). How political elites process information from the news. The cognitive mechanisms behind behavioral political agenda-setting effects. Political Communication, 33(4), 605–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Vos, D. (2015). Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Media Gatekeeping. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Red.), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (2nd dr., pp. 75–89). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soroka, S., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, Politics, and Negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. The American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strøm, K. (1998). Parliamentary committees in European democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 21–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thesen, G. (2012). When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traber, D., Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2014). Party Unity in the Swiss Parliament: The Electoral Connection. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(2), 193–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Aelst, P., Brants, K., Praag, P. V., Vreese, D., Nuytemans, M., & Van Dalen, A. (2008). The fourth estate as superpower? An empirical study on perceptions of media power in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 9(4), 494–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Political agenda setting by the mass media: ten years of research, 2005–2015. In N. Zahariadis (Red.), Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting (pp. 157–179). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Holsteyn, J. J. M., & Andeweg, R. B. (2012). Tweede Orde Personalisering: Voorkeurstemmen in Nederland. Res Publica, 54(2), 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Vonno, C. (2016). Achieving Party Unity. A Sequential Approach to Why MPs Act in Concert. (Doctoral Thesis). Universiteit Leiden, Leiden.Google Scholar
Vatter, A. (2008). Vom Extremtyp zum Normalfall? Die schweizerische Konsensusdemokratie im Wandel: Eine Re-Analyse von Lijpharts Studie für die Schweiz von 1997 bis 2007 [From an extreme type to a normal case? The Swiss consensus democracy in change: a re-analysis of Lijphart’s study of Switzerland from 1997 to 2007]. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(1), 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vesa, J., Blomberg, H., & Kroll, C. (2015). Minimal and Massive! Politicians’ Views on the Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power Revisited. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 279–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2010). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., … Tresch, A. (2016). Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 283–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Nuytemans, M. (2009). Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication, 26(2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power. Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zoizner, A., Sheafer, T., & Walgrave, S. (2017). How Politicians’ Attitudes and Goals Moderate Political Agenda Setting by the Media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(4), 431–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Boon, Jan, Jan Wynen, Walter Daelemans, Jens Lemmens & Koen Verhoest
2024. Agencies on the parliamentary radar: Exploring the relations between media attention and parliamentary attention for public agencies using machine learning methods. Public Administration 102:3  pp. 1026 ff. DOI logo
Butler, Chris & Barbara Vis
2023. Heuristics and policy responsiveness: a research agenda. European Political Science 22:2  pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Huber, Lena Maria, Anita Bodlos, Elisabeth Graf & Thomas M Meyer
2022. Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda. Party Politics 28:2  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Meyer, Thomas M. & Markus Wagner
2021. Issue Engagement Across Members of Parliament: The Role of Issue Specialization and Party Leadership. Legislative Studies Quarterly 46:3  pp. 653 ff. DOI logo
Wonneberger, Anke & Rens Vliegenthart
2021. Agenda-Setting Effects of Climate Change Litigation: Interrelations Across Issue Levels, Media, and Politics in the Case of Urgenda Against the Dutch Government. Environmental Communication 15:5  pp. 699 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.