Cover not available
Article published In:
The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 5:2 (2021) ► pp.219–242

Twitter images across boundaries

Comparing the use of images in political posts from six nations

 | Elon University School of Communications
 | University of Miami School of Communication
Article outline
  • International Twitter comments and cultural context
    • Visual agenda-setting
  • Data collection
  • Results of stage 1: Content analysis
  • Results of stage 2: Textual analysis of images on Twitter
  • Discussion
  • Limitations
  • References
Published online: 7 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.20004.oba
References (40)
References
Albright, J. (2016). The #Election2016 Macro-Propaganda Machine? Taken from [URL]
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Business Insider (2013). [URL]
Chin, J., & Abkowitz, A. (2016). Twitter goes on defensive about China head’s background. The Wall Street Journal, April 20. Taken from: [URL]
Chou, S. (2016). The most widely shared election news? Nasty, brutish and short…and About Donald Trump. MIT Media Lab. Taken from: [URL]
Chun, R. S. (2018). Visual rhetoric of the presidency: An analysis of the Trump and Obama White House messaging in their first 100 days in Flicky images. Journal of Visual Literacy, 37 (1): 18–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R., & Banning, S. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83 1: 313–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. L. (2012). Visual literacy and visual politics: Photojournalism and the 2004 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 60 1: 681–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. and W. V. Friesen. (1975). Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fahmy, S., Bock, M. A., & Wanta, W. (2014). Visual Communication Theory and Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25 1: 46–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golan, G. J., & Himelboim, I. (2016). Can World System Theory predict news flow on twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting. Information, Communication & Society, 19 (8), 1150–1170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, L., and Vargo, J. (2017). Global media agenda-setting: A big data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication, 67 1: 499–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurman, T., & Ellenberger, N. (2015). Reaching the global community during disasters: Findings from a content analysis of the organizational use of Twitter after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Journal of Health Communication, 20 (6): 687–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. (2003). “Visual Social Semiotics: Understanding How Still Images Make Meaning.” Technical Communication 50(1): 46–60.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1), 132–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. N., Kollanyi, B., Bradshaw, S., Neudert, L-M. (2017). Social media, news and political information during the U.S. election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states? The Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, September 28. Taken from: lmneudert [URL]
Isaac, M., & Ember, S. (2016). For election day influence, Twitter ruled social media. The New York Times, November 8, B31.Google Scholar
Jang, M., & Park, Y. J. (2017). Redirecting the focus of the agenda: Testing the zero-sum dynamics of media attention in news and user-generated media. Journal of International Communication 11 1: 3998–4017.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B. (1991). “Reception Analysis: Mass Communication as the Social Production of Meaning.” In K. Jensen and N. Jankowski (eds.), A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar
Kiousis, S., Kim, J. Y., Ragas, M. (2015). Exploring new frontiers of agenda building during the 2012 US presidential election pre-convention period. Journalism Studies, 16 (3): 363–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobré, K. (1999). Editing for Intimacy Visual Communication Quarterly 6(2): 18–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kottasova, I. (2016). A third of pro-Trump tweets are generated by bots. CNN.com, October 18. Taken from: [URL]
Lee, N. Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2015). Tweeting public affairs or personal affairs? Journalists’ tweets, interactivity, and ideology. Journalism, 17 (7), 845–864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Hermida, A. (2013). Content analysis in the era of Big Data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1): 34–52.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (2016). Fake news and the internet shell game. The New York Times, November 281: A-29.Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 1: 176–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntire, M. (2016). How a Putin fan overseas pushed pro-Trump propaganda to Americans. The New York Times, December 17. Taken from: [URL]
Meyers-Levy, J. and L. A. Peracchio. (1995). “Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes.” The Journal of Consumer Research 22(2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, A., & LaPoe, V. (2016). Visual agenda-setting, emotion, and the BP oil disaster. Visual Communication Quarterly, 23 1: 53–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Boyle, J., & Pardun, C. J. (2021). How Twitter drives the global news agenda: Tweets from Brazil, Russia, India, China, the UK and US and online discourse about the 2016 US presidential Election. Global Media and Communication. Online at DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patterson, T. E. (2016). News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. Taken from: [URL]
Pereira, F., & Biachi, M. M. (2016). Women in the 2010 Brazilian presidential elections: Two weekly magazines’ discourses on women candidates. Critical Discourse Studies, 13 (4): 411–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12 1: 118–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shane, S. (2017). The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election, The New York Times, September 7. Taken from: [URL]
Timberg, C. (2017). As conservative Twitter use sleeps, his account is hard at work. The Washington Post, February 5. Taken from [URL]
Tunstall, J. (2008). The media were American. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xiang, D. (2013). China’s image on international English language social media. The Journal of International Communication, 19 (2): 252–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Galgoczy, Michael C., Atharva Phatak, Danielle Vinson, Vijay K. Mago & Philippe J. Giabbanelli
2022. (Re)shaping online narratives: when bots promote the message of President Trump during his first impeachment. PeerJ Computer Science 8 ► pp. e947 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.