Agenda selfying and agendamelding
Advancing the salience of the self
This essay examines the notion of personal salience, introducing individual online media users as ‘objects’ in the
context of agenda setting theory. The salience of the self has been investigated by scholars in various interdisciplinary
explorations. In this project, the notion of personal salience is revisited from an agendamelding perspective. Along with
political and civic agendas of individuals that meld in online community environments, individuals promote themselves as agendas
that deserve public attention. Examining personal agendas raises new questions about perceptional and behavioral influences as
ordinary individuals strive to establish their mediated presence.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Agenda setting in various domains
- Individuals as ‘Objects’
- Personal agendas
- Personal agendas and public salience
- Personal salience
- Personal salience and agendamelding
- Applications and future research
- Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (43)
References
Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t
these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive
frivolity. Social Media &
Society, 2(2), 1–17.
Bantimaroudis, P. (2020). I
am the agenda: Personal salience, agenda selfying and individual name building in hybrid media
settings. Studies in Media and
Communication, 8(1), 1–10.
Bantimaroudis, P. (2017). Setting
agendas in cultural markets: Organizations, creators, experiences. New York: Routledge.
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What
makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing
Research, 49(2), 192–205.
Bossio, D., & Sacco, V. (2016). From
“selfies” to breaking tweets. Journalism
Practice, 11(5), 527–543.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication
power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chadwick, A. (2017). The
hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Choi, T. R., Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., & Choi, S. M. (2017). Get
behind my selfies: The Big Five traits and social networking behaviors through
selfies. Personality and Individual
Differences, 1091, 98–101.
Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow
me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social
media. Computers in Human
Behavior, 551, 190–197.
Coleman, R., & Wu, H. D. (2010). Proposing
emotion as a dimension of affective agenda setting: Separating affect into two components and comparing their second-level
effects. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, 87(2), 315–327.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The
third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion
Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15.
Du Preez, A. (2018). Sublime
selfies: To witness death. European Journal of Cultural
Studies, 21(6), 744–760.
Hall, K. (2015). Selfies
and self-writing. Television & New
Media, 17(3), 228–242.
Hart, M. (2017). Being
naked on the internet: Young people’s selfies as intimate edgework. Journal of Youth
Studies, 20(3), 301–315.
Guo, L. & McCombs, M. (2016). The
power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting research. New York: Routledge.
Koliska, M., & Roberts, J. (2015). Selfies:
Witnessing and participatory journalism with a point of view. International Journal of
Communication, 91, 1672–1685.
Kozinets, R., Gretzel, U., & Dinhopl, A. (2017). Self
in art/self as art: Museum selfies as identity work. Frontiers in
Psychology, 81.
Lee, J. K., & Coleman, R. (2014). Testing
generational, life cycle, and period effects of age on agenda setting. Mass Communication and
Society, 17(1), 3–25.
Maddox, J. (2017). “Guns
don’t kill people … selfies do”: Rethinking narcissism as exhibitionism in selfie-related
deaths. Critical Studies in Media
Communication, 34(3), 193–205.
Maniou, T., & Bantimaroudis, P. (2021). Hybrid
salience: Examining the role of traditional and digital media in the rise of the Greek radical
left. Journalism, 22(4), 1127–1144.
Maniou, T., & Veglis, A. (2016). ‘Selfie
journalism’: Current practices in digital media. Studies in Media and
Communication, 4(1), 111–118.
Marshall, P. D. (2010). The
promotion and presentation of the self: Celebrity as marker of presentational media. Celebrity
Studies, 1(1), 35–48.
Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame:
Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public
Culture, 27(175), 137–160.
McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
McCombs, M. E. (2014). Setting
the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Miguel, C. (2016). Visual
intimacy on social media: From selfies to the co-construction of intimacies through shared
pictures. Social Media &
Society, 2(2), 1–10.
Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2014). Motivations
for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism
Management, 431, 46–54.
Nemer, D., & Freeman, G. (2015). Empowering
the marginalized: Rethinking selfies in the slums of Brazil. International Journal of
Communication 91, 1832–1847.
Ozansoy Çadırcı, T., & Sağkaya Güngör, A. (2019). Love
my selfie: Selfies in managing impressions on social networks. Journal of Marketing
Communications, 25(3), 268–287.
Ragas, M. W. & Roberts, M. (2009). Agenda
setting and agenda melding in an age of horizontal and vertical media: A new theoretical lens for virtual brand
communities. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, 86(1), 45–64.
Shaw, D., Minooie, M., Aikat, D., & Vargo, C. (2019). Agendamelding:
News, social media, audiences, and civic community. New York: Peter Lang.
Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J. (1999). Individuals,
groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public
Opinion
Research, 11(1), 2–24.
Symeou, P. C., Bantimaroudis, P., & Zyglidopoulos, S. (2015). Cultural
agenda setting and the role of critics: An empirical examination in the market for art-house
films. Communication
Research, 42(5), 732–754.
Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016). Why
we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and
Individual
Differences, 971, 260–265.
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. (2013). Agenda
diversity and agenda setting from 1956 to 2004: What are the trends over time? Journalism
Studies, 14(6), 773–89.
Tembeck, T. (2016). Selfies
of ill health: Online autopathographic photography and the dramaturgy of the everyday. Social
Media & Society, 2(1).
Tiidenberg, K., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2015). Selfies,
image and the re-making of the body. Body &
Society, 21(4), 77–102.
Tufekci, Z. (2013). “Not
this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked
activism. American Behavioral
Scientist, 57(7), 848–870.
Weidman, L. M. (2016). Attributes
of a cultural/consumer product: Oregon wine. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The
power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting
research (pp. 206–220). New York: Routledge.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). “You
have one identity”: Performing the self on Facebook and Linked In. Media, Culture &
Society, 35(2), 199–215.
Vargo, C., Guo, L., Shaw, D., & McCombs, M. (2014). Network
issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of
Communication, 64(2), 296–316.
Zappavigna, M., & Zhao, S. (2017). Selfies
in “mommyblogging”: An emerging visual genre. Discourse, Context &
Media, 201, 239–247.
Zhu, J. (1992). Issue
competition and attention distraction: a zero-sum theory of agenda setting. Journalism
Quarterly, 681, 825–36.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Chapelan, Alexis
2024.
3. ‘Pop’ Antisemitism and Deviant Communities. In
Antisemitism in Online Communication,
► pp. 75 ff.
Bantimaroudis, Philemon
2023.
Influencers and Their Salience: Public Perceptions of Individual Agendas on Instagram.
Media Watch 14:2
► pp. 217 ff.
Bantimaroudis, Philemon, Theodora A. Maniou & Thanasis Ziogas
2023.
You are the agenda: The pursuit of personal significance in social media contexts.
Communications 48:4
► pp. 608 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.