Cover not available
Article published In:
The Agenda Setting Journal
Vol. 5:1 (2021) ► pp.84–106

Media vs. candidates and minorities vs. majorities

Who sets the public’s agenda in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary?

 | Boston University
 | Boston University
Despite an abundance of research dedicated to the first level agenda setting process in political elections, there is a considerable gap within the literature regarding how the amount of media coverage granted to minority candidates – people of color and women – influence their salience in public opinion. The current study seeks to address this gap by analyzing the effects of online coverage of minority candidates and their subsequent performance in national polling data from June 1, 2019 to November 20, 2019. The present study utilizes a time-series analysis to compare three information formats: Twitter accounts of major media organizations, online web mentions of candidates from these organizations, and the candidates’ own Twitter presence. The presented findings illustrate important relationships – specifically, where candidates of color were able to set their own agenda through their Twitter accounts as opposed to coverage that they received from the media.
Keywords: agenda setting theory, political primary, polling data, priming theory, Twitter presence, time series analysis
Article outline
  • Literature review
    • Agenda setting
      • Theoretical overview
      • Agenda setting and social media
      • Impact on polling
    • Priming theory
    • Media representation
      • Minorities
      • Women
    • Theoretical contribution
  • Method
    • Data collection
      • Media Data
      • Polling data
    • Data analysis
  • Findings
  • Discussion
    • Implications
  • References
Published online: 15 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.20009.tri
References (40)
References
Aaker, J., & Chang, V. (2009). Obama and the power of social media and technology. The European Business Review, 16–21.Google Scholar
Alexa. (2018). The top 500 sites on the web – subcategory “Breaking News.” Retrieved from [URL]
Boydstun, A. E., Hardy, A., & Walgrave, S. (2014). Two faces of media attention: Media storm versus non-storm coverage. Political Communication, 31(4), 509–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, S. M., & McIlwain, C. D. (2006). Minority candidates, media framing, and racial cues in the 2004 election. Harvard International Journal of Press/politics, 11(4), 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desilver, D. (2018). A record number of women will be serving in the new Congress. Retrieved from [URL]
Falk, E. (2007). Women for president: Media bias in nine campaigns. University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Feezell, J. T. (2015). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geiger, A. W. (2019). Key findings about the online news landscape in America. Retrieved from [URL]
Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2001). Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 247–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 424–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2017). Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 598–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, R. A., & Hill, T. G. (2005). agenda setting and priming in prime time television: Crime dramas as political cues. Political Communication, 22(3), 277–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, L. (2012). Hillary and Barack: Will atypical candidates lead to atypical coverage? The Howard Journal of Communications, 23(3), 272–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A., & Wojcik, S. (2019). 10 facts about Americans and Twitter. Retrieved from: [URL]
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: agenda setting and priming in a television age. News that Matters: agenda setting and Priming in a Television Age.Google Scholar
Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P., & Ban, H. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26(4), 414–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. C., Daniel, A., Lieberman, R., Migliozzi, V., & Burns, A. (2019). Which Democrats are leading the 2020 presidential race? Retrieved from [URL]
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York.Google Scholar
Majstorovic, D., & Vilović, G. (2017). The presence and depiction of women on the front pages of Croatian daily newspapers: In the service of promoting gender stereotypes? Medijske Studije, 8(16), 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E. (1992). Explorers and surveyors: Expanding strategies for agenda-setting research. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 813–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montanaro, D. (2020). Majority of Americans say Trump increased racial tensions after George Floyd’s death, poll finds. Retrieved from [URL]
Park, C. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior. 29(4), 1641–1648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2019). State of the news media methodology. Retrieved from [URL]
Oliphant, J. B. (2019, June 26). 6 facts about Democrats as the party holds its presidential debates. Retrieved from: [URL]
Real Clear Media Group. (2018). RealClearPolitics. Retrieved from [URL]
Santucci, J. (2019). The DNC again raises the requirements needed to qualify for the Democratic debates. Retrieved from [URL]
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
Siders, D. (2018). Kamala Harris’ rapid rise confounds California. Retrieved from [URL]
Skogerbø, E., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2015). Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter: Intermedial agenda setting in local election campaigns. Journalism Practice, 9(3), 350–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Son, Y. J., Weaver, D. H. (2006). Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U.S. election, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 174–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96(1), 58–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tukachinsky, R., Mastro, D., & Yarchi, M. (2015). Documenting portrayals of race/ethnicity on primetime television over a 20-year span and their association with national-level racial/ethnic attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasburn, P. C., & Wasburn, M. H. (2011). Media coverage of women in politics: The curious case of Sarah Palin. Media, Culture, and Society, 33(7), 1027–041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Upadhyay, Akanksa & Briana Marie Trifiro
2021. Legislative agenda-setting power of social media. The Agenda Setting Journal 5:2 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.