Cover not available
Part of
The Evolving Curriculum in Interpreter and Translator Education: Stakeholder perspectives and voices
Edited by David B. Sawyer, Frank Austermühl and Vanessa Enríquez Raído
[American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XIX] 2019
► pp. 319–340

Teaching translation in a multilingual practice class

Understood as a course of instruction that aims to improve translation practice in a space where the instructor does not master all the languages, the multilingual practice class may save money for training institutions but can present serious challenges to instructors, especially with respect to the assessment of translation quality. Solutions to these challenges can be found in a few pedagogical principles: it is enough to set up task-based discovery activities to focus on cognitive processes and their interaction with technologies, privileging questions to which there are no consensual answers and using peer assessment for evaluating product quality. This approach effectively brings research techniques into the teaching space. It might thus meet resistance in institutional contexts where master-apprentice models traditionally attribute authority to the instructor’s experience, rather than to the learners’ discoveries.

Article outline
  • Introduction
  • General guidelines
    • Focus on processes, not products
    • Work on things we don’t know
    • Encourage experimentation
    • Form a multilingual community
  • Pedagogical principles
    • The class is task-based, as far as possible
    • Students work in twos and threes
    • Use screen recording (and other cheap technologies)
    • Translation quality can be peer-assessed with rough numbers
    • Process quality can be assessed quantitatively and qualitatively
    • Theoretical principles and research results are to be discovered, not given
  • Curricular content
    • Introduction to translator styles
    • Translation-memory segmentation
    • Directionality
    • Pre-editing vs. post-editing
    • Translator-client negotiations
  • Results
  • Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xix.15pym
References
Angelone, E.
(2013) Watching and learning from ‘virtual professionals’: Utilizing screen recording in process-oriented translator training. In D. Kiraly, S. Hansen-Schirra & K. Maksymski (Eds.), New prospects and perspectives for educating language mediators (pp. 139–155). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Berber, D., & Kretschmann, B.
(2016) The multilingual approach to interpreter training as a solution. Journal of Translator Education and Translation Studies, 1(1), 94–104. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Bowker, L.
(2016) The need for speed! Experimenting with ‘speed training’ in the scientific/technical translation classroom. Meta, 61, 22–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D.
(1993) Writing strategies and writers’ tools. English Today, 9(2), 32–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crezee, I.
(2015) Semi-authentic practices for student health interpreters. Translation & Interpreting, 7(3), 50–62.Google Scholar
(2016) The benefits of reflective blogs in language-neutral translator education. FITISPos International Journal, 3, 28–41.Google Scholar
Durban, C.
(2011) Translation. Getting it right. Alexandria, VA: American Translators Association. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Fallada-Pouget, C., Biau Gil, J. R., Pym, A., & Gutiérrez-Colón Plana, M
(2005) La formación de la comunidad en dos cursos virtuales: un estudio comparativo [Community training in two online courses: A comparative study]. In M. L. Carrió Pastor (Ed.), Perspectivas interdisciplinares de la lingüística aplicada [Interdisciplinary perspectives of applied linguistics] (Vol. 3, pp. 221–234). València: Universitat Politècnica de València, Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada.Google Scholar
House, J.
(1986) Acquiring translational competence in interaction. In J. House & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication (pp. 179–191). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(2000) Consciousness and the strategic use of aids in translation. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit & R. Jääskeläinen (Eds.), Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research (pp. 149–162). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hui, T. T. M.
(2012) Risk management by trainee translators: A study of translation procedures and justifications in peer-group interaction (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. Retrieved from [URL]
Mossop, B.
(2001/2014) Revising and editing for translators (3rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muegge, U.
(2008) Controlled language. Retrieved from [URL].
Pavlović, N.
(2007) Directionality in collaborative translation processes it (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. Retrieved from [URL]
Pym, A.
(2004) E-learning in translator training. In L. Rega & M. Magris (Eds.), Übersetzen in der Fachkommunikation – Comunicazione specialistica e traduzione (pp. 161–173). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(2009) Using process studies in translator training; Self-discovery through lousy experiments. In S. Göpferich, F. Alves & I. M. Mees (Eds.), Methodology, technology and innovation in translation process research (pp. 135–156). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Pym, A., & Torres-Simón, E.
(2015) The pedagogical value of translation solution types. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 23(1): 89–106. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2016) Designing a course in Translation Studies to respond to students’ questions. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 10(2), 183–202. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wallace, M.
(2014) Team-based learning in introductory translation courses. In Y. Cui & W. Zhao (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation (pp. 27–45). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar