Due to limits on the reallocation of cognitive effort during sight translation, comprehension problems are likely to be more disruptive than they would be in written translation. Eye movements during the processing of “disrupted” experimental texts should reveal important information about the influence of disruptions on cognition. Experiments were conducted manipulating syntactic complexity in stimuli texts in order to determine the effect on cognitive effort. The results showed the predicted syntactic effect and indicated that sight translation is more sensitive to disruption than written translation. The results also indicated that sight translation is extraordinarily sensitive to visual interference because of the continued presence of the source text.
2024. A computer-assisted consecutive interpreting workflow: training and evaluation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer► pp. 1 ff.
Jiang, Xinlei, Yue Jiang & Xiaopeng Zhang
2024. Assessing effects of source text complexity on L2 learners’ interpreting performance: a dependency-based approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Chan, Venus
2023. Investigating the impact of a virtual reality mobile application on learners' interpreting competence. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 39:4 ► pp. 1242 ff.
Chernovaty, Leonid, Martin Djovčoš & Natalia Kovalchuk
2023. The Impact of the Source-Text Syntactic Characteristics on the Sight-Translation Strategies and Quality. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 34:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
Fang, Jing, Xiaomin Zhang & Haidee Kotze
2023. The effects of training on reading behaviour and performance in sight translation: a longitudinal study using eye-tracking. Perspectives 31:4 ► pp. 655 ff.
Giancola, Kiara & Charlène Meyers
2023. Errors in Specialized Translation Training: A Corpus-Based Study on the Sight Translation of a Popular Science Article. CLINA Revista Interdisciplinaria de Traducción Interpretación y Comunicación Intercultural 9:2 ► pp. 85 ff.
Shang, Xiaoqi & Guixia Xie
2023. Investigating sight translation as a predictor of interpreting performance. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Su, Wenchao
2023. Eye-voice span in sight interpreting: an eye-tracking investigation. Perspectives 31:5 ► pp. 969 ff.
Xiao, Yao, Kristian Tangsgaard Hvelplund & Chen-En Ho
2022. Eye-Tracking in Interpreting Studies: A Review of Four Decades of Empirical Studies. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Lijewska, Agnieszka, Agnieszka Chmiel & Albrecht W. Inhoff
2022. Stages of sight translation: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:5 ► pp. 997 ff.
Zou, Longhui, Michael Carl, Mehdi Mirzapour, Hélène Jacquenet & Lucas Nunes Vieira
2022. AI-Based Syntactic Complexity Metrics and Sight Interpreting Performance. In Intelligent Human Computer Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13184], ► pp. 534 ff.
2021. Pause in Sight Translation: A Longitudinal Study Focusing on Training Effect. In Diverse Voices in Chinese Translation and Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 157 ff.
2021. Coping with syntactic complexity in English–Chinese sight translation by translation and interpreting students.. Across Languages and Cultures 22:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
ALAN, Cihan
2020. Processing Garden-Path Sentences in Sight Translation: An Experimental Study. Çeviribilim ve Uygulamaları Dergisi :29 ► pp. 1 ff.
Chmiel, Agnieszka, Przemysław Janikowski & Anna Cieślewicz
2020. The eye or the ear?. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
2019. Material development principles in undergraduate translator and interpreter training: balancing between professional realism and classroom realism. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 13:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Lee, Jieun
2013. What Skills Do Student Interpreters Need to Learn in Sight Translation Training?. Meta 57:3 ► pp. 694 ff.
Risku, Hanna
2012. Cognitive Approaches to Translation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Risku, Hanna
2020. Cognitive Approaches to Translation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Setton, Robin
2012. Models of Interpreting. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.