Article published in:
Translation and CognitionEdited by Gregory M. Shreve and Erik Angelone
[American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XV] 2010
► pp. 109–142
Translation units and grammatical shifts
Towards an integration of product- and process-based translation research
Drawing on corpus-based and process-based approaches, this paper reports on the results of an exploratory study using highly annotated translation corpora in conjunction with key logging, eye tracking, and retrospective verbalizations to identify translation units associated with cognitive effort during a translation task. The annotated corpora are used to analyze the grammatical shifts correlated with the processes of (de)metaphorization that occur during translation. The results of the corpus analysis are then triangulated with process data from an analysis of the performance of two German-English translators while carrying out an inverse translation task. Together the process and product data clearly explicate the nature of the translation units associated with (de)metaphorization during the cognitive processing of the translation.
Published online: 28 May 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.07alv
https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.07alv
Cited by
Cited by 44 other publications
No author info given
2017.
In Researching Translation Competence by PACTE Group [Benjamins Translation Library, 127],
No author info given
2019.
In The Neurocognition of Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 147],
Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano & Igor Antônio Lourenço da Silva
2014. Effortful text production in translation.
Translation and Interpreting Studies ► pp. 25 ff.
Bisiada, Mario
2018. Editing nominalisations in English−German translation: when do editors intervene?.
The Translator 24:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Bisiada, Mario
2018. The editor’s invisibility.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 30:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Bisiada, Mario
2018. Translation and editing: a study of editorial treatment of nominalisations in draft translations.
Perspectives 26:1 ► pp. 24 ff.
Dai, Guangrong
2016.
In Hybridity in Translated Chinese [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 193 ff.
Espunya, Anna
2021. Reduced abstractness in Spanish-English translation: the case of property-denoting nouns.
Meta 65:2 ► pp. 440 ff.
Fotheringham, Christopher
2017. A cognitive-pragmatic model for translation-shift analysis in descriptive case studies.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L.
2015. Cognitive Translation Studies and the merging of empirical paradigms.
Translation Spaces 4:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
Halverson, Sandra L.
2017.
In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition,
► pp. 193 ff.
Hansen‐Schirra, Silvia
2017.
In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition,
► pp. 232 ff.
Hassani, Marwan, Daniel Töws, Alfredo Cuzzocrea & Thomas Seidl
2019. BFSPMiner: an effective and efficient batch-free algorithm for mining sequential patterns over data streams.
International Journal of Data Science and Analytics 8:3 ► pp. 223 ff.
Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina, Daniel Couto Vale & Stella Neumann
2019. Shorter than a text, longer than a sentence.
Target 31:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina & Stella Neumann
2018. Processing of grammatical metaphor.
Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
House, Juliane
2013. Towards a new linguistic-cognitive orientation in translation studies.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 25:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
House, Juliane
2015.
In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 72],
► pp. 49 ff.
House, Juliane
2019.
In Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 3 ff.
Jääskeläinen, Riitta
2012.
In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 3],
► pp. 191 ff.
Jääskeläinen, Riitta
2016.
In Reembedding Translation Process Research [Benjamins Translation Library, 128],
► pp. 89 ff.
Kruger, Haidee
2012. A corpus-based study of the mediation effect in translated and edited language.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 24:2 ► pp. 355 ff.
Liparini Campos, Tânia
2015. (De)Metaphorization in the Cognitive Process of Professional Translators.
Translation Spaces 4:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Liu, Xiaodong
2021.
In Cognitive Processing Routes in Consecutive Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ],
► pp. 39 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Bo Wang, Yuanyi Ma & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2022.
In Systemic Functional Insights on Language and Linguistics [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 125 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Bo Wang, Yuanyi Ma & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2022.
In Systemic Functional Insights on Language and Linguistics [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 237 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Bo Wang, Yuanyi Ma & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2022.
In Systemic Functional Insights on Language and Linguistics [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 281 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Moslem Yousefi
2022. Systemic functional linguistics as a resource for teacher education and writing development.
Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Munday, Jeremy
2013. The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 25:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Munday, Jeremy
2015.
In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 72],
► pp. 127 ff.
O'Brien, Sharon
2015.
In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 72],
► pp. 5 ff.
O’Brien, Sharon
2013. The borrowers.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 25:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Redelinghuys, Karien & Haidee Kruger
2015. Using the features of translated language to investigate translation expertise.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Risku, Hanna
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Risku, Hanna
2020.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Rodríguez-Inés, Patricia
2014. ¿Cómo traducen traductores y profesores de idiomas? Estudio de corpus.
Meta 58:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Rodríguez‐Inés, Patricia
2017.
In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition,
► pp. 265 ff.
Schäffner, Christina & Mark Shuttleworth
2013. Metaphor in translation.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 25:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Schäffner, Christina & Mark Shuttleworth
2015.
In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 72],
► pp. 95 ff.
Stasimioti, Maria, Vilelmini Sosoni & Konstantinos Chatzitheodorou
2021. Investigating post-editing effort.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8:2 ► pp. 378 ff.
Steiner, Erich
2015. Contrastive studies of cohesion and their impact on our knowledge of translation (English-German).
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 27:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Tercedor, Maribel, Clara Inés López-Rodríguez & Pamela Faber
2013. Working with Words: Research Approaches to Translation-Oriented Lexicographic Practice1.
TTR 25:1 ► pp. 181 ff.
Valli, Paola
2014. Pulling strings.
Translation and Interpreting Studies 9:1 ► pp. 52 ff.
Whyatt, Bogusława & Marcin Naranowicz
2020. A robust design of the translator’s skill set: evidence for transfer of metacognitive skills to intralingual paraphrasing.
The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zanettin, Federico
2014.
In Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach,
► pp. 178 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.