Part of
Translation and CognitionEdited by Gregory M. Shreve and Erik Angelone
[American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XV] 2010
► pp. 143–165
Edited by Gregory M. Shreve and Erik Angelone
[American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XV] 2010
► pp. 143–165
Controlled language and readability
Using eye tracking methodology, we investigate correlations between traditional readability indicators and controlled language (CL) rules applied to texts from the information technology domain. We evaluate the perceived readability and recall levels of the texts as well as the readability and acceptability of the texts when machine-translated into French, Spanish, and Simplified Chinese. Task time, fixation count, and fixation duration measures suggest that CL rules facilitate a marginal improvement in readability levels for texts rated as “difficult to read” by the readability indicators. We conclude that the relationship between controlled language and readability is complex and make discrete suggestions for factors that should be taken into account for future research, including text complexity, text presentation, and working memory capacity.
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Carl, Michael, Silke Gutermuth & Silvia Hansen-Schirra
2015. Post-editing machine translation. In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 115], ► pp. 145 ff. 
Condamines, Anne
2021. Towards an ergonomic linguistics: Application to the design of controlled natural languages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Doherty, Stephen & Sharon O'Brien
2014. Assessing the Usability of Raw Machine Translated Output: A User-Centered Study Using Eye Tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
Huang, Xie’an & Hong Xu
2023. Rei Miyata: controlled document authoring in a machine translation age. Language Resources and Evaluation 57:3 ► pp. 1423 ff.
Miyata, Rei, Anthony Hartley, Kyo Kageura & Cécile Paris
2015. ‘Garbage Let’s Take Away’: Producing Understandable and Translatable Government Documents: A Case Study from Japan. In Social Media for Government Services, ► pp. 367 ff.
Nurminen, Mary
2020. Raw machine translation use by patent professionals. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
O'Brien, Sharon
2015. The borrowers. In Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 72], ► pp. 5 ff.
O’Brien, Sharon
O’Brien, Sharon
2019. Lynne Bowker and Jairo Buitrago Ciro. Machine Translation and Global Research
. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 31:3 ► pp. 505 ff.
Risku, Hanna
2012. Cognitive Approaches to Translation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Risku, Hanna
2020. Cognitive Approaches to Translation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Rodríguez Vázquez, Silvia
2015. A controlled language-based evaluation approach to ensure image accessibility during web localisation. Translation Spaces 4:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Rossetti, Alessandra & Sharon O'Brien
2019. Helping the helpers: Evaluating the impact of a controlled language checker on the intralingual and interlingual translation tasks involving volunteer health professionals. Translation Studies 12:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Shih, Claire Y.
2023. Navigating the Web,
Sun, Sanjun
2019. Measuring Difficulty in Translation and Post-editing: A Review. In Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 139 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.