This paper proposes a syntactic account of the variation Hungarian case assigning adpositions exhibit in their word order and extraction properties. The empirical generalization is that if a P allows the prepositional word order then it can also be stranded by its complement and it also has a particle use, but not vice versa. We suggest that some Ps are inserted in the Place/Path head and cannot move higher. Ps allowing the particle use and P-stranding are inserted in a higher head, namely p. The particle use and P-stranding involve PlaceP/PathP extraction from pP, separating the adposition from its complement. PlaceP/PathP and pP are head-final. A subset of Ps inserted in p may move into a higher, left-headed projection, deriving a prepositional order. We also account for the fact that some case assigning Ps may appear without a complement. We suggest that this is due to a difference in the licensing of deictic here/there complements, which may remain silent: those Ps have a seemingly intransitive use that allow here/there as their complement.
2008The Morphosyntax of Case and Adpositions: University of Utrecht dissertation.
Asbury, Anna, Berit Gehrke & Veronika Hegedűs
2007One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category P. In Cem Keskin (ed.), Uil OTS yearbook 2006, 1–17. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts
2007Disharmonic word-order systems and the Final-over-Final-Constraint FOFC. In Antonietta Bisetto & Francesco E. Barbieri (eds.), Proceedings of the XXXIII incontro di grammatica generativa, 86–105. Bologna: Universitá di Bologna.
Cinque, Guglielmo
2010Mapping spatial PPs: An introduction. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures 6, 3–25. New York: Oxford University Press.
Creissels, Denis
2006Suffixes casuels et postpositions en hongrois. Bulletin de la société de linguistique de Paris 101(1). 225–272.
Dékány, Éva
2011A profile of the Hungarian DP. The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
Dér, Csilla
2012Mennyire (prototipikus) névutók a ragvonzó névutók a magyarban?. In Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy & Tátrai Szilárd (eds.), Konstrukció és jelentés, 11–29. Budapest: ELTE BTK.
Dér, Csilla
2013A kontextus szerepe a magyar ragvonzó névutók viselkedésében. In Grammatika és kontextus. Új szempontok az uráli nyelvek kutatásában III, 9–19. Budapest: ELTE Finnugor Tanszék.
Dikken, Marcel den
2010On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 74–126. New York: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin
1999Mi tartozik a névutók osztályába?. Magyar nyelvjárások 37. 167–172. [URL].
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2014aAz ősmagyar SOV szórendtől az ómagyar ’topik fókusz V X*’ szórendig. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Magyar történeti mondattan, 14–33. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
É. Kiss, Katalin
(ed.)2014bThe evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin
2014cThe evolution of functional left peripheries in the Hungarian sentence. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin
(ed.)2014dMagyar történeti mondattan. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
2014aThe DP-cycle in Hungarian and the functional extension of the noun phrase. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 11, 56–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Egedi, Barbara
2014bFőnévi kifejezések: határozottság, névelőhasználat, birtokos szerkezetek. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Magyar történeti mondattan, 95–125. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Emonds, Joseph E
1985A unified theory of syntactic categories. Studies in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gelderen, Elly van
2011The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.
2006Hungarian spatial PPs. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 33(2). 220–233.
Hegedűs, Veronika
2013Non-verbal predicates and predicate movement in Hungarian: University of Tilburg dissertation.
Hegedűs, Veronika
2014aThe cyclical development of Ps in Hungarian. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 11, 122–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegedűs, Veronika
2014bA névutós kifejezések grammatikalizációja és belső szerkezeti változásai. In Magyar történeti mondattan, 154–176. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Horvath, Julia
1978Verbal prefixes: a non-category in Hungarian. Glossa: an international journal of lingustics 12(2). 137–162.
Jackendoff, Ray
1973The base rules for prepositional phrases. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 345–356. New York: Holt.
Kayne, Richard S
2004Here and there. In Lexique, syntaxe et lexique-grammaire, 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kenesei, István
1992Az alárendelt mondatok szerkezete [The structure of embedded clauses]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan. [Hungarian structural grammar 1. Syntax], 529–714. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Koopman, Hilda
2000Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. The structure of Dutch PPs. In Hilda Koopman (ed.), The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads. Collected Essays of Hilda Koopman Routledge leading linguistics, 204–260. London: Routledge.
Koopman, Hilda
2010Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 26–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leu, Thomas
2008‘What for’ internally. Syntax 11(1). 1–25.
Marácz, László
1984Postposition stranding in Hungarian. In Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Mey (eds.), Groninger arbeiten zur germanistischen linguistik 24, 127–161. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Marácz, László
1985A magyar névutós csoportról. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 87. 173–180.
1989Asymmetries in Hungarian: Rijksuniversität Groningen dissertation.
Pantcheva, Marina
2011Decomposing Path: University of Tromsø dissertation.
Radics, Katalin
1992Fossilized gerunds with possessive endings in Hungarian. In István Kenesei & Csaba Pléh (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 4, 283–300. Szeged: JATE.
Rákosi, György
2010On snakes and locative binding in Hungarian. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference, 396–415. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [URL]
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1978A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of Prepositional Phrases. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1990Functional prepositions. In Ham Pinkster & Inge Genee (eds.), Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th Birthday, 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris.
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1997Push chains and drag chains: Complex predicate split in Dutch. In Shigeo Tonoike (ed.), Scrambling, 7–33. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Riemsdijk, Henk van & Riny Huybregts
2002Location and locality. In Marc van Oostendorp & Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds.), Progress in grammar: Articles at the 20th anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, 1–23. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer, Andrew J. & Gregory T. Stump
2013Hungarian pronominal case and the dichotomy of content and form in inflectional morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(4). 1207–1248.
Surányi, Balázs
2009Locative particle and adverbial incorporation at the interfaces. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Adverbs and adverbial adjuncts at the interfaces Interface explorations 20, 39–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Svenonius, Peter
2003Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 31(2). 430–445.
2010Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 127–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trommer, Jochen
2008 “Case suffixes”, postpositions and the Phonological Word in Hungarian. Linguistics 46(2). 403–437.
Zwarts, Joost
1997Vectors as relative positions: a compositional semantics of modified PPs. Journal of Semantics 14. 57–86.
Zwarts, Joost & Yoad Winter
2000Vector space semantics: a model-theoretic analysis of locative prepositions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9. 169–211.
2020. Back to restitutives (again): A syntactic account of restitutive and counterdirectional verbal particles in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 67:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Rákosi, György & Enikő Tóth
2022. Pushed out of arm's reach: Pronouns and spatial anaphora in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 69:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.