This paper argues that there is a fundamental difference between alienable and inalienable possession in the syntax of the noun phrase, and that this difference involves direction of predication. A possessum is the subject of a predicate that is or contains the possessor; the configurational relationship between the possessive predicate and its subject is established by a relator that takes the possessum either as its specifier or as its complement, with the possessive predicate occupying the other position in the small clause. Alienably possessed noun phrases involve an underlying syntax in which the possessum is the relator’s specifier; inalienable possession constructions are built on a structure in which the possessum is the complement of the relator. The paper provides an analytical sketch of a partial typology of possessed noun phrases and an account of the cross-linguistic generalisation that for languages that show a systematic structural distinction between alienable and inalienable adnominal possession, it is the inalienably possessed noun phrase that is morphosyntactically simpler than the alienably possessed one. The focus of the discussion is on Hungarian, a language whose ‘possessedness marker’ -(j)a/-(j)e is teased apart into two component parts: an affixal ‘spurious’ article -a/e lexicalising the relator of DP-internal possession, and an additional -j- that in noun phrases that show a morphological alienability split has morphemic status, functioning as the linker that facilitates the Predicate Inversion derivation of alienably possessed noun phrases.
2006Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dikken, Marcel den
2011On the strategies for forming long A′–dependencies: Evidence from Hungarian. In Balázs Surányi (ed.), [title tbd] (volume of papers from the conference on Minimalist Approaches to Syntactic Locality). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (to appear).
Dikken, Marcel den & Anikó Lipták
1997Csoda egy nyelv. In Jane Coerts & Helen de Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997. 61–72.
Dikken, Marcel den, Anikó Lipták & Zsófia Zvolenszky
2001On inclusive reference anaphora: New perspectives from Hungarian. In Karine Megerdoomian & Leora Anne Bar-El (eds.), WCCFL 20 Proceedings, 137–49. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Dobler, Eva
2008The morpho-phonology of (in)alienable possession. In Susie Jones (ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association/Actes du congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne de linguistique 2008.
Elekfi, László
2000Semantic differences of suffix alternates in Huangarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47. 145–177.
Gerland, Doris & Albert Ortmann
2012What counts as relational in Hungarian, Uralic and beyond?CTF
2012, Düsseldorf.
Guéron, Jacqueline
1985Inalienable possession, PRO-inclusion and lexical chains. In Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation. Dordrecht: Foris. 43–86.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008Syntactic universals and usage frequency, 3: Alienable vs. inalienable possessive constructions. Handout, Leipzig Spring School on Linguistic Diversity.
Heine, Bernd & Kézié Lébikaza
1997On attributive possession in Kabiye. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 217–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1995Stage-level/individual-level predicates. In Gregory Carlson & Francis Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 125–175. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Larson, Richard & Franc Marušić
2004Indefinite pronoun structures with APs. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 268–287.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1985Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and Proto-Oceanic. In Andrew Pawley & Lois Carrington (eds.), Austronesian linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress. Pacific Linguistics C-88. 93–140.
Moravcsik, Edith
2003Inflectional morphology in the Hungarian noun phrase: A typological assessment. In Frans Plank (ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter. 113–252.
Napoli, Donna Jo
1989Predication theory: A case study for indexing theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nichols, Johanna
1988On alienable and inalienable possession. In W. Shipley (ed.), In honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics, 557–609. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rácz, Péter
2010Hungarian phonology and morphology: Discord in the possessive allomorphy of Hungarian. MA thesis, ELTE.
2009Alienable and inalienable possession in Hungarian. Paper presented at
New Trends in Uralistics
, Szeged, 3–5 September 2009. Earlier version published as ‘Az elidegeníthető és az elidegeníthetetlen birtoklás kifejezésmódjairól’, in Nyelvtudomány I (2005). 155–169.
Szabolcsi, Anna
1983The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3. 89–102.
Szabolcsi, Anna
1994The noun phrase. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and Semantics 27, 179–274. San Diego: Academic Press.
Szabolcsi, Anna & Tibor Laczkó
1992A főnévi csoport szerkezete. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan I. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 179–298.
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Alberti, Gábor & Judit Farkas
2015. Az elidegeníthető birtoklást kifejező -j- képző esete a -(Vt)t főnévképzővel és más főnévképzőkkel. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
den Dikken, Marcel
2018. An Integrated Perspective on Hungarian Nominal and Verbal Inflection. In Boundaries Crossed, at the Interfaces of Morphosyntax, Phonology, Pragmatics and Semantics [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 94], ► pp. 147 ff.
2021. Possessive DPs. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 159 ff.
Dékány, Éva
2021. The Functional Sequence Above QP. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 93 ff.
Farkas, Judit & Gábor Alberti
2017. Általánosítások a potenciális magyar birtokszóváltozatokra vonatkozóan. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 4:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
2023. Morphological analysis of alienability contrast in Nuer: an atypical typical case. The Linguistic Review 40:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.