Relative pronouns as sluicing remnants
This paper demonstrates on the basis of novel data from Hungarian that contrary to received opinion, sluicing is possible inside relative clauses. It shows that sluicing can affect a relative clause to the exclusion of its relative pronoun in headless or headed relatives that can be considered non-canonical free choice expressions. In sluicing, the relative pronoun that gets stranded in the ellipsis process furthermore bears the major stress associated with the relative clause, a cross-linguistically rare possibility in languages. The findings throw a new light on theories concerned with the syntactic licensing of sluicing and ellipsis in general, pointing at the crucial role of prosody.
References (35)
References
Beghelli, Filippo & Tim Stowell 1997. Distributivity and negation. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bouton, Lawrence F. 1970. Antecedent-contained proforms. In Mary Ann Campbell, et al. (eds), Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society 6, 154–167. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives with Wh-Words Cross-linguistically. PhD dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
Citko, Barbara 2004. On Headed, Headless, and Light-Headed Relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 95–126.
Craenebroeck, Jeroen van. 2010. The syntax of ellipsis. Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van and Anikó Lipták. 2006. The cross-linguistic syntax of sluicing: evidence from Hungarian relatives. Syntax 9. 248–274.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van and Anikó Lipták. 2013. What Sluicing Can do, What it Can’t, and in Which Language: on the cross-linguistic syntax of ellipsis. In L.L. Cheng and Norbert Corver (eds), Diagnosing Syntax. Oxford University Press. 502–536.
Dayal, Veneeta. 1997. Free choice and ever: Identity and free choice readings. In Aaron Lawson (ed), Proceedings of SALT 7, 99–116. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.
von Fintel, Kai. 2000. Whatever. In Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews (eds), Proceedings of SALT 10, 27–40. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.
Hackl, Martin. et al. 2012. Quantification and ACD. Journal of Semantics 29. 145–206.
Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoyt, Frederik and Alexandra Teodorescu. 2012. How many kinds of sluicing, and why? Single and multiple sluicing in Romanian, English and Japanese. In Kyle Johnson & Jason Merchant (eds), Sluicing: a cross-linguistic perspective, 83–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In. Emond Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara Partee (eds), Quantification in natural language. 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kálmán, László and Ádám Nádasdy. 1994. A hangsúly. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed), Stukturális Magyar Nyelvtan II. Fonológia, 393–467. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kántor, G. 2008. On Hungarian Relative Operators. In László Varga (ed.), The Even Yearbook 8. ELTE SEAS Working Papers in Linguistics ELTE Budapest. Available online at: [URL] (accessed on 14.7.2014).
Kenesei, István. 1992. Az alárendelt mondatok szerkezete. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan, 529–713. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kennedy, Chris. 1997. Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 662–688.
Lobeck, Anne C. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2000. ACD in negative polarity items. Syntax 3. 144–150.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2002. Swiping in Germanic. In C. Jan-Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, 289–315. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Riemsijk, Henk van. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: the binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who. In Fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green and Jerry L. Morgan, 252–286.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2004. The prosodic structure of function words. In John J. McCarthy (ed.) Optimality theory in phonology. A reader, 464–482. Malden / Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sprouse, Jon. 2006. The Accent Projection Principle: Why the hell not? In Aviad Eilam, Tatjana Scheffler and Joshua Tauberer (eds), Proceedings of the 29th Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12.1. 349–359. Pennsynvania: Penn Graduate Linguistics Society.
Surányi, Balázs, Shinichiro Ishihara & Fabian Shubö. 2012. Syntax-prosody mapping, topic-comment structure and stress-focus correspondence in Hungarian. In Gorka Elordieta and Pila Prieto (eds), Prosody and meaning, 35–71. Göttingen: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2011. Remarks on Antecedent Contained Sluicing. Ms. York University.
Thoms, Gary. 2013. Lexical mismatches and the identity condition. In Stefan Keine and Shayne Sloggett (eds), NELS 42 Proceedings, 559–572. Amherst: GSLA.
Yoshida, Masaya & Ángel J. Gallego. 2012. Phases and Ellipsis. In Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss and Gereon Müller (eds.), Local Modeling of Non-Local Dependencies in Syntax, 353–370. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Yoshida, Masaya. 2010. “Antecedent Contained” Sluicing. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 348–356.
Varga, László. 2002. Intonation and Stress: Evidence from Hungarian. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Cinque, Guglielmo
2020.
The Syntax of Relative Clauses,
Šimík, Radek
2020.
Doubling unconditionals and relative sluicing.
Natural Language Semantics 28:1
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.