Chapter published in:
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 15: Papers from the 2015 Leiden ConferenceEdited by Harry van der Hulst and Anikó Lipták
[Approaches to Hungarian 15] 2017
► pp. 183–208
Chapter 7Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass–count distinction
We argue that Hungarian has both mass and count nouns, and a plural marker which is sensitive to the distinction, as well as a system of sortal classifiers. In English, most nouns are either mass (e.g mud) or count (e.g. book), and there are only a limited number of fully flexible nouns with both mass and count forms (e.g. stone/stones). In Hungarian, however, most count nouns are flexible, and a noun like rózsa ‘rose’ is ambiguous between a mass and a count item. This results in two ways of counting: rózsa as a count noun can be directly modified by a numeral as in két rózsa ‘two roses’, but if it is a mass noun counting uses a classifier construction as in két szál rózsa.
Keywords: mass/count, classifiers, plurality, bare NPs
Article outline
- 1.The problem
- 2.Plurality is not a classifier
- 3.Evidence for a mass/count distinction in Hungarian
- 4.Flexible nouns
- 5.Some crosslinguistic contextualisation
-
Acknowledgements -
Notes -
References
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.15.07sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.15.07sch
References
Bale, Alan C. & David Barner
Barner, David & Jesse Snedeker
Carlson, Gregory
Cheng, Lisa & Rint Sybesma
Csirmaz, Anikó & Éva Dékány
Farkas, Donka & Henriette De Swart
Landman, Fred & Susan Rothstein
Li, XuPing
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Susan Rothstein
Rothstein, Susan
to appear). Count vs. Mass. In Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Ede Zimmermann eds. The Blackwell Companion to Semantics (SemCom) Oxford Wiley Blackwell
Sauerland, Uli
Schmitt, Cristina & Alan Munn
Scontras, Gregory
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Dékány, Éva
Erbach, Kurt, Peter R. Sutton & Hana Filip
Landman, Fred
Rothstein, Susan & Roberta Pires De Oliveira
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.