Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 5164


Árnason, Kristján
2011The phonology of Icelandic and Faroese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backley, Phillip
2011An introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, Roberto
1998The phonology of Campidanian Sardinian: A unitary account of a self-organizing structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Botma, Bert & Janet Grijzenhout
2018 “Voiced fricatives in Element Theory: Evidence from the Nordic languages” (paper presented at Elements: State of the art and perspectives, June 15, Nantes).
Botma, Bert & Marijn van ’t Veer
2013 “A fraction too much friction: The phonological status of voiced fricatives.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 2013 ed. by S. Aalberse and A. Auer, 46–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Jana & Marzena Żygis
2011 “Why do glottal stops and low vowels like each other?Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ed. by W. -S. Lee and E. Zee, 376–379. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas
2001 “Jahai phonology: A preliminary survey.” Mon-Khmer Studies 31: 29–45.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.
1990 “The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification.” Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech ed. by J. Kingston and M. Beckman, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. & Elizabeth V. Hume
1995 “The internal organization of speech sounds.” The handbook of phonological theory ed. by J. Goldsmith, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine
2001Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ewen, Colin J. & Harry van der Hulst
2001The phonological structure of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 63 ]
Gussmann, Edmund
2002Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie
2010 “Probing the unnatural.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 2010 ed. by J. van Kampen and R. Nouwen, 73–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. A.
1992Syllable structure and syllable-related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John
1994English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1996 “Phonological output is redundancy-free and fully interpretable.” Current trends in phonology: Models and methods ed. by J. Durand and B. Laks, 305–332. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.Google Scholar
1997 “Licensing inheritance: An integrated theory of neutralization.” Phonology 14: 315–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “The phonology of being understood: Further arguments against sonority.” Lingua 116: 1483–1494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Why final obstruent devoicing is weakening.” Strength relations in phonology ed. by K. Nasukawa and P. Backley, 9–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey
1995 “The elements of phonological representation.” Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations ed. by J. Durand and F. Katamba, 34–79. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick
2008 “Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: Tracing concepts through the history of phonology.” Lenition and fortition ed. by J. Brandão de Carvalho, T. Scheer and P. Ségéral, 9–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar Fant & Morris Halle
1952 “Preliminaries to speech analysis.” Tech. rep. 13, MIT Acoustics Lab.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1971Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda
2002 “Coronal epenthesis and markedness.” Phonology 19: 219–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loos, Eugene
1969The phonology of Capanahua and its grammatical basis. Oklahoma: Norman.Google Scholar
Mansen, Karis & Richard Mansen
1984Aprendamos Guajiro. Bogota: Editorial Townsend.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J.
1988 “Feature geometry and dependency: A review.” Phonetica 43. 84–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mielke, Jeff
2008The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel
1998The Fyem language of northern Nigeria. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Odden, David
1996The phonology and morphology of Kimatuumbi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2005Introducing phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Henry
1966 “Warao I: Phonology and morphophonemics.” International Journal of American Linguistics 32: 108–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pompino-Marschall, Bernd & Marzena Żygis
2011 “Glottal marking of vowel-initial words in German.” Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ed. by W. -S. Lee and E. Zee, 1626–1629. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
2007 “Markedness.” The Cambridge handbook of phonology ed. by P. de Lacy, 79–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 64 ]
Schourup, Lawrence
1973 “A cross-linguistic study of vowel nasalization.” Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 190–221.Google Scholar
Shiraishi, Hidetoshi & Bert Botma
2017 “On the diachronic origin of Nivkh height restrictions.” Sonic signatures ed. by G. Lindsey and A. Nevins, 201–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solnit, David
1997Eastern Kayah Li: Grammar, texts, glossary. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Sóskuthy, Márton
2013 “Analogy in the emergence of intrusive-r in English.” English Language and Linguistics 17: 55–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca
2008 “The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization.” The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky ed. by K. Hanson and S. Inkelas, 151–180. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uffmann, Christian
2007 “Intrusive [r] and optimal epenthetic consonants.” Language Sciences 29: 451–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rachel
2000Nasalization, neutral segments, and opacity effects. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Yar-Shater, Eshan
1969A grammar of Southern Tati dialects. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar