Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 97110


Audacity Team
2017Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer program]. Version 2.2.1, retrieved from http://​audacityteam​.org/.
Audring, Jenny
2006 “Pronominal Gender in Spoken Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 18 (2): 85–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef C. J., Hans J. Bennis, Gunther De Vogelaer, Magda Devos & Margreet H. van der Ham
2006Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (DynaSAND). Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut. http://​www​.meertens​.knaw​.nl​/sand/.
Bakker, Frens
1992 “Wie me euver vrouwluuj sprik. Zeej of het, die of det .” Veldeke 67 (1): 10–15.Google Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily
2013 “Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.” Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (3): 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 109 ]
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2017Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.36, retrieved 11 November 2017 from http://​www​.praat​.org/.
Braun, Friederike & Geoffrey Haig
2010 “When are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement.” Language in its socio-cultural context: New explorations in global, medial and gendered uses, ed. by M. Bieswanger, H. Motschenbacher and S. Mühleisen, 69–85. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Alan Garnham, Jane Oakhill & Kate Cain
1996 “The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 49A (3): 639–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie
2013 “Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region.” Language and space: Dutch. An international handbook of linguistic variation, ed. by F. Hinskens and J. Taeldeman, 378–399. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Roeland van Hout & Mieke Steegs
2010 “Evaluating Regional Accent Variation in Standard Dutch.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1), 101–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennison, Shelia M. & Jessie L. Trofe
2003 “Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(3): 355–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nederlandse Voornamenbank
Nieuwland, Mante S.
2014 “ ‘Who’s he?’ Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns.” Journal of Memory and Language 76: 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, Mante S. & Jos J. A. van Berkum
2006 “Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs.” Brain Research 1118 (1): 155–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2015 “Between feminine and neuter, between semantic and pragmatic gender: Hybrid names in German dialects and in Luxembourgish.” Agreement from a diachronic perspective, ed. by J. Fleischer, E. Rieken and P. Widmer, 235–266. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc
2012, February 18th. “Marie z’n fiets is kapot” [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://​www​.neerlandistiek​.nl​/2012​/02​/marie​-zn​-fiets​-is​-kapot/ on January 19th 2018.
Osterhout, Lee & Linda A. Mobley
1995 “Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree.” Journal of Memory and Language 34 (6): 739–773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Qualtrics [Software]. Provo, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
Quené, Hugo & Huub van den Bergh
2004 “On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial.” Speech Communication 43 (1–2): 103–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2018R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://​www​.R​-project​.org/.
[ p. 110 ]
Schmitt, Bernadette M., Monique Lamers & Thomas F. Münte
2002 “Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing.” Cognitive Brain Research 14: 333–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse
2013 “Judgment data.” Research methods in linguistics, ed. by R. J. Podesva and D. Sharma, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sirin, Selcuk R., Donald R. McCreary & James R. Mahalik
2004 “Differential reactions to men and women’s gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 12 (2): 119–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Sijs, Nicoline
ed. 2011Dialectatlas van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Subbarao, K. V. & B. Lalitha Murthy
2011 “Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Telugu.” Lexical anaphors and pronouns in selected South Asian languages: A principled typology, ed. by B. C. Lust, K. Wali, J. W. Gair and K. V. Subbarao, 217–274. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
de Vogelaer, Gunther
2007 “De Nederlandse en Friese subjectsmarkeerders: geografie, typologie en diachronie.” Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar
Weijnen, A. A.
1966Nederlandse Dialectkunde. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Zaręba, Alfred
(1984–5) “Osobliwa zmiana rodzaju naturalnego w dialektach polskich.” Zbornik Matice Srpske za Filologiju i Lingvistiku 17–18: 243–247.Google Scholar