Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 111124
References (22)

References

Assink, Egbert M. H.
1985 “Assessing spelling strategies for the orthography of Dutch verbs.” British Journal of Psychology 76 (3): 353–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Ton Dijkstra & Robert Schreuder
1997 “Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model.” Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1): 94–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Hedderick van Rijn
1995 “The CELEX database.” Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Bosman, Anna M. T.
2005 “Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students.” Written Language & Literacy 8 (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam & Willem M. Mak
2005 “Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms.” Memory & Cognition 33 (7): 1160–1173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayol, Michel, Pierre Largy & Patrick Lemaire
1994 “Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 47 (2): 437–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folkard, Simon
1975 “Diurnal variation in logical reasoning.” British Journal of Psychology 66 (1): 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, Steven, & Dominiek Sandra
2002 “Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors.” Brain and Language 81 (1–3): 545–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, Esther, Robert Schreuder & Anneke Neijt
2015 “From t-bias to d-bias in Dutch: Evidence from children’s spelling and pronunciation.” Written Language & Literacy 18 (1): 104–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutto, C. J., Sarita Yardi, & Eric Gilbert
2013A longitudinal study of follow predictors on twitter. Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems, 821–830). ACM. ([URL]). DOI logo
Largy, Pierre, & Michel Fayol
1996 “The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors.” Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (3): 217–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laudanna, Alessandro & Cristina Burani
1985 “Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries.” Linguistics 23 (5): 775–792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke & Robert Schreuder
2007 “Asymmetrical phoneme-grapheme mapping of coronal plosives in Dutch.” Written Language & Literacy 10 (2): 219–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek
2010 “Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: Spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms.” Language and Speech 53 (3): 405–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, & Michel Fayol
2003 “Spelling errors with a view on the mental lexicon: Frequency and proximity effects in misspelling homophonous regular verb forms in Dutch and French.” Morphological structure in language processing ed. by R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder, 485–514. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, Steven Frisson & Frans Daems
1999 “Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch.” Brain and Language 68 (1–2): 277–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, & Lien van Abbenyen
Tjong Kim Sang, Erik & Antal van den Bosch
2013 “Dealing with big data: The case of Twitter.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 31: 121–134.Google Scholar
van der Veer, Neil, Steven Boekee & Oscar Peters
2017 “Nationale Social Media Onderzoek 2017 [National Social Media Research 2017].” Accessed 27 March 2018. [URL].
Verhaert, Nina
2016 “Rules Or Regularities? The Homophone Dominance Effect in Spelling and Reading Regular Dutch Verb Forms.” PhD diss., Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Verhaert, Nina, Ellen Danckaert & Dominiek Sandra
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Berg, Kristian, Stefan Hartmann & Daniel Claeser
2024. Are some morphological units more prone to spelling variation than others? A case study using spontaneous handwritten data. Morphology 34:2  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Sandra, Dominiek, Dorit Ravid & Ingo Plag
2024. The orthographic representation of a word’s morphological structure: beneficial and detrimental effect for spellers. Morphology 34:2  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
van den Boer, Madelon & Elise H. de Bree
2024. To Show or Tell: Improving the Spelling of Rule-Based Words with Explicit or Implicit Practice. Scientific Studies of Reading 28:3  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Gahl, Susanne & Ingo Plag
Sandra, Dominiek
2022. Too Little Morphology Can Kill You: The Interplay Between Low-Frequency Morpho-Orthographic Rules and High-Frequency Verb Homophones in Spelling Errors. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23],  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Dominiek Sandra & Reinhild Vandekerckhove
2022. Adolescents and Verb Spelling: The Impact of Gender and Educational Track on Rule Knowledge and Linguistic Attitudes. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 DOI logo
Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Anna M. T. Bosman & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
2021. The role of grammar in spelling homophonous regular verbs. Written Language & Literacy 24:1  pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
de Bree, Elise & Madelon van den Boer
2021. Wrong place, wrong time: Children’s sensitivity to present tense spelling conventions. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:5  pp. 1221 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
2020. From experiment to real-life data. The Mental Lexicon 15:3  pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
Rey, Arnaud, Jean-Luc Manguin, Chloé Olivier, Sébastien Pacton, Pierre Courrieu & Francesca Peressotti
2019. Spelling performance on the web and in the lab. PLOS ONE 14:12  pp. e0226647 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.