Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 111124


Assink, Egbert M. H.
1985 “Assessing spelling strategies for the orthography of Dutch verbs.” British Journal of Psychology 76 (3): 353–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Ton Dijkstra & Robert Schreuder
1997 “Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model.” Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1): 94–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Hedderick van Rijn
1995 “The CELEX database.” Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Bosman, Anna M. T.
2005 “Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students.” Written Language & Literacy 8 (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam & Willem M. Mak
2005 “Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms.” Memory & Cognition 33 (7): 1160–1173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayol, Michel, Pierre Largy & Patrick Lemaire
1994 “Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 47 (2): 437–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folkard, Simon
1975 “Diurnal variation in logical reasoning.” British Journal of Psychology 66 (1): 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, Steven, & Dominiek Sandra
2002 “Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors.” Brain and Language 81 (1–3): 545–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, Esther, Robert Schreuder & Anneke Neijt
2015 “From t-bias to d-bias in Dutch: Evidence from children’s spelling and pronunciation.” Written Language & Literacy 18 (1): 104–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutto, C. J., Sarita Yardi, & Eric Gilbert
2013A longitudinal study of follow predictors on twitter. Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems, 821–830). ACM. ([URL]). DOI logo
Largy, Pierre, & Michel Fayol
1996 “The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors.” Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (3): 217–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laudanna, Alessandro & Cristina Burani
1985 “Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries.” Linguistics 23 (5): 775–792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke & Robert Schreuder
2007 “Asymmetrical phoneme-grapheme mapping of coronal plosives in Dutch.” Written Language & Literacy 10 (2): 219–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek
2010 “Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: Spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms.” Language and Speech 53 (3): 405–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, & Michel Fayol
2003 “Spelling errors with a view on the mental lexicon: Frequency and proximity effects in misspelling homophonous regular verb forms in Dutch and French.” Morphological structure in language processing ed. by R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder, 485–514. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, Steven Frisson & Frans Daems
1999 “Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch.” Brain and Language 68 (1–2): 277–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, & Lien van Abbenyen
Tjong Kim Sang, Erik & Antal van den Bosch
2013 “Dealing with big data: The case of Twitter.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 31: 121–134.Google Scholar
van der Veer, Neil, Steven Boekee & Oscar Peters
2017 “Nationale Social Media Onderzoek 2017 [National Social Media Research 2017].” Accessed 27 March 2018. [URL].
Verhaert, Nina
2016 “Rules Or Regularities? The Homophone Dominance Effect in Spelling and Reading Regular Dutch Verb Forms.” PhD diss., Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Verhaert, Nina, Ellen Danckaert & Dominiek Sandra
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Berg, Kristian, Stefan Hartmann & Daniel Claeser
2023. Are some morphological units more prone to spelling variation than others? A case study using spontaneous handwritten data. Morphology DOI logo
Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Anna M. T. Bosman & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
2021. The role of grammar in spelling homophonous regular verbs. Written Language & Literacy 24:1  pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
de Bree, Elise & Madelon van den Boer
2021. Wrong place, wrong time: Children’s sensitivity to present tense spelling conventions. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:5  pp. 1221 ff. DOI logo
Gahl, Susanne & Ingo Plag
Rey, Arnaud, Jean-Luc Manguin, Chloé Olivier, Sébastien Pacton, Pierre Courrieu & Francesca Peressotti
2019. Spelling performance on the web and in the lab. PLOS ONE 14:12  pp. e0226647 ff. DOI logo
Sandra, Dominiek
2022. Too Little Morphology Can Kill You: The Interplay Between Low-Frequency Morpho-Orthographic Rules and High-Frequency Verb Homophones in Spelling Errors. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23],  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Sandra, Dominiek, Dorit Ravid & Ingo Plag
2024. The orthographic representation of a word’s morphological structure: beneficial and detrimental effect for spellers. Morphology DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
2020. From experiment to real-life data. The Mental Lexicon 15:3  pp. 422 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
van den Boer, Madelon & Elise H. de Bree
2023. To Show or Tell: Improving the Spelling of Rule-Based Words with Explicit or Implicit Practice. Scientific Studies of Reading  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.