Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 125138
References

References

Acheson, Daniel. J., Justine B. Wells & Maryellen C. MacDonald
2008 “New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students.” Behavior Research Methods 40(1): 278–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernaerts, Lars, Marco Caracciolo, Luc Herman & Bart Vervaeck
2014 “The storied lives of non-human narrators.” Narrative 22: 68–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome
1986Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2008 “Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny.” Lingua 118: 141–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, Anneke, Hans Hoeken, José Sanders & Johannes W. J. Beentjes
2012 “Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion.” Communication Research 39: 802–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Peter & Helen de Hoop
2018 “Shifting Animacy.” Theoretical Linguistics 44(1/2). 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1991 “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.” Language 67: 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagel, Suzanne, Ninne Stukker & Loes van Andel
2012Hoe telbaar is stijl? – Een kwantitatieve analyse van observatie en participatie in de stijl van Arnon Grunberg. Nederlandse letterkunde 17(3): 178–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 137 ]
Fowler, Roger
1977Linguistics and the novel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott M.
2005 “The Lattice of Case and Agentivity.” Master’s thesis, Amsterdam University.Google Scholar
Hartung, Franziska, Michael Burke, Peter Hagoort & Roel M. Willems
2016 “Taking perspective: Personal pronouns affect experiential aspects of literary reading.” PLoS One 11(5): e0154732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Suzanne
2007Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, David C., & Emanuele Castano
2013 “Reading literary fiction improves Theory of Mind.” Science 342: 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Emy
2015 “Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses.” Poetics 50: 62–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, Moniek, Frank Hakemulder, Ed Tan, & Miruna Doicaru
2014 “Exploring absorbing reading experiences – developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption.” Scientific Study of Literature 4(1): 89–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu & Etsuko Kaburaki
1977 “Empathy and Syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry 8(4): 627–672.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol II, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nijhof, Annabel D. & Roel M. Willems
2015 “Simulating Fiction: Individual Differences in Literature Comprehension Revealed with fMRI.” PLoS One 10(2): e0116492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
2012 “Animacy, generalized semantic roles, and differential object marking.” Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension ed. by M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart, 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radanović, Jelena, Chris Westbury & Petar Milin
2016 “Quantifying Semantic Animacy: How much are words alive?Applied Psycholinguistics 37: 1477–1499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2008 “Animacy and grammatical variation – Findings from the English genitive variation.” Lingua 118: 151–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ralf
2001 “Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literary Character: The Dynamics of Mental-Model Construction.” Style 35: 607–42.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. & Richard F. West
1989 “Exposure to print and orthographic processing.” Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szewczyk, Jakub M. & Herbert Schriefers
2011 “Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.” Brain research 1368: 208–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trompenaars, Thijs, Lotte Hogeweg, Wessel Stoop & Helen de Hoop
. To appear. “The language of an inanimate narrator.” Open Linguistics.
Vogels, Jorrig, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2013 “When a stone tries to climb up a slope: The interplay between lexical and perceptual animacy in referential choices.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamomoto, Matsumi
1999Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 138 ]