Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
Edited by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 36] 2019
► pp. 13–19
Part I: Invited papers on the occasion of the 50th Dutch Annual Linguistics Day

The final frontier

Non-human animals on the linguistic research agenda

| Meertens Instituut (KNAW) | Maastricht University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The final frontier: “Language is what makes us human”
  • 3.Cognition – body fluidities
  • 4.Conclusion: A research programme
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00015.cor
References (25)
References
Andrews, Kristin. 2016. “Animal cognition”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition) ed. by E. N. Zalta, Stanford University: Metaphysics Research Lab. [URL]
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. “Grounded cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 591:617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Ad Backus. 2011. “Repertoires revisited: ‘Knowing language’ in superdiversity”. Working Papers in Urban Languages and Literacies. Paper 671.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2016. “Embodied sociolinguistics”. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates ed. by N. Coupland, 173–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cederholm, Erika Andersson, Björck, Amelie, Jennbert Kristina & Ann-Sofie Lönngren. 2014. “Editors’ introduction.” Exploring the Animal Turn. Human-Animal Relations in Science, Society and Culture ed. by E. Cederholm, B. Andersson, J. K. Amelie & A. Lönngren, 5–12. Lund: The Pufendorf Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie. 2018. “Interspecies communication: The greeting of the dairy cow(s).” Talk presented at the Workshop Language and Human Sociality in the Making , December 3, University of Copenhagen.
Cornips, Leonie & Karen P. Corrigan. 2005. “Toward an integrated approach to syntactic variation: A retrospective and prospective synopsis.” Syntax and Variation. Reconciling the Biological with the Social ed. by L. Cornips & K. Corrigan, 1–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Frans Gregersen. 2016. “The impact of Labov’s contribution to general linguistic theory”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4):498–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Cecilia Poletto. 2005. “On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques. PART I.” Lingua 115(7):939–957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Waal, Frans B. M. & Pier Francesco Ferrari. 2010. “Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition.” Trends in Cognitive Science 14(5):201–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Mello, Sidney & Stan Franklin. 2011. “A cognitive model’s view of animal cognition.” Current Zoology 57(4):499–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2017. “What would Lenneberg think? Biolinguistics in the third millennium.” Biolinguistics 111:445–461.Google Scholar
Francione, Gary L. & Anna E. Charlton. 2017. “Animal rights.” The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies ed. by L. Kalof, 25–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford/Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford/Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meijer, Eva R. 2017. Political Animal Voices. Unpubl. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, Jana Bressem & Silva Ladewig. 2013. “Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: a multimodal approach.” Body – Language – Communication ed. by C. F. Müller, S. Ladewig & M. Tessendorf, 733–754. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1999. Talen. De Toren van Babel [Languages. The Tower of Babel]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2018. Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. “The faculty of language: What’s special about it?” Cognition 95(2):201–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2004. “Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(4):399–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric & Stephen J. Cowley. 2013. “Human thinking beyond the brain.” Cognition Beyond the Brain Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice ed. by S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau, 1–12. Springer-Verlag: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Rasenberg, Marlou, Azeb Amha, Matt Coler, Marjo van Koppen, Emiel van Miltenburg, Lynn de Rijk, Wyke Stommel & Mark Dingemanse
2023. Reimagining language. Linguistics in the Netherlands 40 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Pablé, Adrian
2022. Language and radical anthropocentrism: the view from the supercategory. Semiotica 2022:247 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie & Louis van den Hengel
2021. Place-Making by Cows in an Intensive Dairy Farm: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Nonhuman Animal Agency. In Animals in Our Midst: The Challenges of Co-existing with Animals in the Anthropocene [The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, 33], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.