Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
Edited by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 36] 2019
► pp. 176–191
Part II: Selected papers presented at the Dutch Annual Linguistics Day of 2019

Emphatic reflexives as part-structure modifiers

| Utrecht University

The standard analysis of emphatic reflexives assumes that they are focused expressions of identity in all their uses (e.g. Gast 2006). On the basis of semantic and prosodic data, I argue that exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives in Dutch and English should instead be analyzed as expressions excluding certain participants from the modified event (“P-exclusives”). The proposed analysis is based on Moltmann’s (2004) account of the part-structure modifier ‘alone’, and avoids a number of problems that the standard analysis has when applied to these data.

Keywords: emphatic reflexives, part-structure modifiers, focus, modification, agentivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The standard account of ERs
  • 2.Properties of exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives
    • 2.1Prosodic properties
    • 2.2Instrumental readings
    • 2.3Modification
  • 3.Part-structure modifiers
    • 3.1P-exclusives
    • 3.2Moltmann’s theory of part-structure modifiers
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00031.tel
References

Bibliography

Alrenga, Peter
2010 “Comparisons of similarity and difference”. Adjectives: Formal Analyses in Syntax and Semantics ed. by Patricia Cabredo Hofherr and Ora Matushansky, 155–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browning, M. A.
1993 “Adverbial Reflexives”. Proceedings of NELS 231, 83–93.Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle
2012 “On her own. Parsimonious Compositionality: Probing Syntax and Semantics with French propre ”. PhD Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
de Clerck, Liesbeth & Els van der Kooij
2005 “Modifiable and intensifier self in Dutch and Sign Language of the Netherlands”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005: 61–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2001 “Reanalysing selbst ”. Natural Language Semantics 91: 371–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. & Frans Plank
1978 “Great expectations: An intensive self analysis”. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 373–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker
2006 The Grammar of Identity. Intensifiers and reflexives in Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2011 “Discourse scalarity: the case of Dutch helemaal ”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2810–2825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, Jonathan
2010 “The Semantics and Prosody of Post-nominal Focus Particles”. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. by Melinda Heijl.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally
2005 “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates”. Language 81(2): 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard and Volker Gast
2006 “Focused assertion of identity: a typology of intensifiers”. Linguistic Typology 101: 223–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
1999 “Pragmatic Halos”. Language 751: 522–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995 “Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface”. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike
1995 “Part-Structure Modifiers”. Proceedings of SALT 5 ed. by Mandy Simons and Teresa Galloway, 255–272. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
1998 “Part Structures, Integrity, and the Mass-Count Distinction”. Synthese 1161: 75–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “The semantics of together ”. Natural Language Semantics 121: 289–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992 “A theory of focus interpretation”. Natural Language Semantics, 11: 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2000 Intensifiers in English and German. A comparison. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Storoshenko, Dennis
2011 “Distribution and Analysis of Adverbial Emphatic Reflexives in English”. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Tellings, Jos
2015 “Expressing identity in Imbabura Quichua”. Proceedings of SULA 8 ed. by J. Pasquereau, 89–104.Google Scholar
Tribushinina, Elena & Theo Janssen
2011 “Re-conceptualizing scale boundaries: the case of Dutch helemaal ”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2043–2056. DOI logoGoogle Scholar