Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2020
Edited by Elena Tribushinina and Mark Dingemanse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 37] 2020
► pp. 149164
References

References

Axel, Katrin & Angelika Wöllstein
2009 “German verb-first conditionals as unintegrated clauses.” The fruits of empirical linguistics ed. by Sam Featherston & Susanne Winkler. 1–35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biezma, María
2011 “Conditional inversion and givenness.” Proceedings of SALT 21 ed. by Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz. 552–571. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Blom, Elma & Frank Wijnen
2013 “Optionality of finiteness: evidence for a non-overlap stage in Dutch child language.” First Language 33(3): 225–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
2016Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and verb phrases. Volume 3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977 “Filters and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert
2016 “Exclamative relatives in vocative noun phrases.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 21(3): 79–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, James
1984 “On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns.” Linguistic Inquiry 15(4): 531–574.Google Scholar
Jansen, Frank
1981Syntaktische constructies in gesproken taal. Amsterdam: Huis aan de Drie Grachten.Google Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline van
1992 “Underspecification of functional features.” Paper presented at the BUCLD , October 23–25.
1997 “First steps in wh-movement.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
2010 “Anaforische middelen voor topicverschuiving.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 15(2/3): 189–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf
2000 “The flexible nature of verb movement.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Ans van Kemenade
2018 “Syntax and the morphology of deixis: the loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking.” Atypical demonstratives: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics ed. by Marco Coniglio. 127–158. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie
2016 “The positionally sensitive workings of the Dutch particle nou .” A family of discourse markers across the languages of Europe and beyond ed. by Peter Auer & Yael Maschler. 377–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Elena Titov, Hans van de Koot & Reiko Vermeulen
2009 “A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast.” Alternatives to cartography ed. by Jeroen van Craenenbroeck. 15–51. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overdiep, Gerrit
1937Stilistische grammatica van het moderne Nederlandsch. Zwolle: Tjeenk-Willink.Google Scholar
Thrift, Erica
2003 “Object drop in the LI acquisition of Dutch.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1993 “Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach.” PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
2005 “Verb second as a function of Merge.” The function of function words and functional categories ed. by Marcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora. 11–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar