The productivity of Dutch diminutives
This study reports on an investigation of the productivity of the Dutch diminutive paradigm, which gives rise to
five suffixal allomorphs, against the background of Yang’s (2016) Tolerance Principle.
It shows how, by studying the frequency of the allomorphs and the environments in which they occur, we can use the Tolerance
Principle to determine if a productive rule system can be found for the Dutch diminutives. In doing so, we also describe how we
collected the necessary data by setting up a corpus study on Dutch diminutives, including a specific one with data from child
directed speech.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Dutch diminutives
- 2.1Empirical background
- 2.2Theoretical accounts
- 2.3Acquisition findings
- 3.Quantifying the relevant diminutive data distribution
- 3.1The tolerance principle
- 3.2Corpus research: Determining allomorphs
- 3.3Corpus research: Feature selection
- 4.A Tolerance Principle based analysis of Dutch diminutives
- 4.1Finding a productive rule system
- 4.2Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
-
References
References
Augustinus, Liesbeth, Ineke Schuurman, Vincent Vandeghinste & Frank Van Eynde
2014 “
GrETEL:
Searching for breadcrumbs in texts.” Centre for Computational Linguistics KU Leuven. Accessed 2 July
2020,
[URL]
Berko, Jean
1958 “
The
child’s learning of English
morphology.”
Word 14 (2–3): 150–177.
Boersma, Tiffany. A.
2018 “
Variability in the acquisition
of allomorphs.” PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
Booij, Geert
1999 The
phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Den Os, Els, & Rita Harder
1987 “
De
verwerving van de regels voor meervouds- en verkleinwoordsvorming in het Nederlands.”
De Nieuwe
Taalgids 801: 240–250.
Gillis, Steven
1997 “
The
acquisition of diminutives in Dutch.”
Studies in pre- and
protomorphology, edited by
W. Dressler. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Huber, Daniel
2005 “
Some
notes about the Dutch diminutive suffix.”
Government Phonology
Workshop 2(4):23–19.
van der Hulst, Harry
2008 “
The
Dutch
diminutive.”
Lingua 118.9: 1288–1306.
Kooij, Jan & Marc van Oostendorp
2003 Fonologie:
uitnodiging tot de klankleer van het
Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Linke, Kathrin
2020 “
Diminutive
allomorphy.”
Taalportaal, 09 June
2021,
[URL]
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The
CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3ʳᵈ
edition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Odijk, Jan
2015 “
Linguistic
research with PaQu.”
Computational Linguistics in The
Netherlands 51: 3–14.
Trommelen, Mieke
1984 The
syllable in Dutch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
van Tuijl, Rosita
2020 “
The
productivity of Dutch diminutives.” MA diss. Utrecht University.
Yang, Charles
2016 The
price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Yip, Kenneth, & Gerry Sussman
1997 “
Sparse
representations for fast, one-shot learning.”
Proceedings of the National Conference on
Artificial Intelligence: 521–527.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Shi, Rushen & Emeryse Emond
2023.
The threshold of rule productivity in infants.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
Yang, Charles
2023.
A User’s Defense of the Tolerance Principle: Reply to Enger (2022).
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 145:4
► pp. 563 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.