Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 240–262

A nanosyntactic approach to Dutch deadjectival verbs

 | KU Leuven
 | CNRS/LLF/Université Paris Cité
 | Masaryk University
There are three ways of deriving verbs in Dutch: through zero marking, through suffixation, and through prefixation. We focus on prefixed deadjectival verbs, contrasting two views. According to the first view, prefixed verbs are left-headed: the prefix is responsible for the change in category, i.e. [V ver [A breed]]. The second view holds that prefixed verbs are right-headed, and involve a zero verbalizing suffix, i.e. [V ver [V [A breed] ∅]]. We argue in this paper for a mixed, nanosyntactic, approach. We adopt Ramchand’s (2008) decomposition of the verb and argue that the prefix spells out part of the verbal structure and the verbal root spells out another part.
Keywords: deadjectival verbs, change-of-state verbs, causative-inchoative alternation, nanosyntax, phrasal spellout
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Derived verbs in Dutch
    • 2.1Deriving Dutch verbs
    • 2.2Prefixed verbs and Right-Hand Head Rule
    • 2.3Resultative semantics
    • 2.4The inchoative-causative ambiguity
  • 3.Ingredients for the analysis
    • 3.1Phrasal spellout and Nanosyntax
    • 3.2Decomposing the verb
  • 4.The account
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00072.wyn
References (18)
References
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. 's Gravenhage: SDU Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 1995. Particles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Directions from the GET-GO. On the syntax of manner-of-motion verbs in directional constructions.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9(1): 23–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2020. “A head movement approach to Talmy’s typology.” Linguistic Inquiry 51(3): 425–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia. 1972. “Some observations on the syntax and semantics of instrumental verbs.” CLS 81: 83–97.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten Cornelis van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Louise McNally. 1999. “Scale structure underlies teli-city in degree achievements.” Proceedings of SALT 9 1, ed. by Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch. 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. “Small clause results.” Lingua 741: 101–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun, Moniek Lansu & Marion Westerduin. 1987. “Complexe verba.” Glot 101: 6177.Google Scholar
Lundquist, Björn, Martin Corley, Mai Tungseth, Antonella Sorace & Gillian Ramchand. 2016. “Anticausatives are semantically reflexive in Norwegian, but not in English.” Glossa 11: 47.1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Joleen Schipper. 1993. “Verbal prefixation in Dutch: thematic evidence for conversion.” Yearbook of Morphology 1992, ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle. 57–92. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, William. 1995. “A neo-Davidson approach to resultatives, particles, and datives.” Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25 1, ed. by Jill Beckman. 457–472. University of Pennsylvania: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2009. “Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language.” Nordlyd 361: 1–6.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Complex left branches, spellout, and prefixes.” Exploring Nanosyntax, ed. by Lena Baunaz, Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander. 239–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. “Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms.” Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, ed. by Timothy Shopen. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 31, 57–149 (Language Typology and Syntactic Description), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 2001. “Measuring events.” Language 771: 61–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument structure and morphology.” The Linguistic Review 11: 81114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar