Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2023
Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 23–38

Univerbation in Afrikaans verbal diminutives

| KU Leuven
| KU Leuven

This paper concerns the verbal diminutive suffixes -el and -er in Afrikaans. In previous work (Cavirani-Pots et al. 2023), these suffixes have been analysed on par with their Dutch counterparts. In this paper we present the results of a nonsense word experiment on these suffixes in Afrikaans (94 participants) and Dutch (242 participants). The results show that the Afrikaans participants significantly underperform in guessing the meaning of these suffixes compared to the Dutch participants. We take this to mean that the underlying structure of verbs containing these suffixes is different in the two languages. Based on the three-way division of affix types of Creemers et al. (2018), we follow Cavirani-Pots et al. (2023)’s analysis of the Dutch -el and -er suffixes as being level Ia suffixes, i.e. suffixes that appear right above the stem they attach to. For Afrikaans, however, we propose that -el and -er have lost their suffixal status, and have undergone univerbation with the stem.

Keywords: verbal diminutive suffixes, roots, univerbation, Afrikaans
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous work
    • 2.1 Creemers et al. (2018)
    • 2.2 Cavirani-Pots et al. (2023)
  • 3.The experiment
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Data preparation
    • 3.3Results
  • 4.Theoretical analysis
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00077.cav
References
Acquaviva, Paolo
2009 “Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology.” York-Essex Morphology Meeting, ed. by Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo, 1–21.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2014 The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny, Geert E. Booij & Ray S. Jackendoff
2017 “Menschlen, kibbelen, sparkle. verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020 The Roots of Verbal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 The Normal Course of Events: Structuring Sense, vol. II1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boudelaa, Sami & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2004 “Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-skeleton in Arabic.” Cognition 92(3): 271–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005 Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combrink, Johan G. H.
1990 Afrikaanse Morfologie. Capita Exemplaria. Pretoria: Academica.Google Scholar
Cavirani-Pots, Cora
2020 “Roots in progress. semi-lexicality in the Dutch and Afrikaans verbal domain.” PhD diss., LOT Dissertation series, Amsterdam.
Cavirani-Pots, Cora, Engela de Villiers & Dany Jaspers
2023 “More species in the affixal forest. the case of dutch and afrikaans -el and -er.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 139(1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conradie, Jac
2007 “The final stages of deflection: the case of afrikaans het ‘have’.” Historical Linguistics 2005. Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by J. Salmons & S. Dubenion-Smith, 207–221.Google Scholar
Creemers, Ava
2020 “Morphological processing and the effects of semantic transparency.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Creemers, Ava, Jan Don & Paula Fenger
2018 “Some affixes are roots, others are heads.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 361: 45–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, Marijke
2011 “Roots and affixes. Eliminating lexical categories from syntax.” PhD diss., UiL-OTS/Utrecht University/HUBrussel.
2017 “The root and nothing but the root: primary compounds in Dutch.” Syntax 20(2): 138–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen
1993 Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: Sdu.Google Scholar
De Vos, Mark Andrew
2003 “Past participles in Afrikaans dialects and Dutch.” WCCFL 22 Proceedings ed. by G. Garding & M. Tsujimura, 519–532.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
2012 Roots of Afrikaans. Selected writings of Hans den Besten. (Creole Language Library 44). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Feldman, Laurie Beth & Shlomo Bentin
1994 “Morphological analysis of diisrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Phychology 47(2): 407–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ram, Avital Deutsch, Orna Gilboa, Michal Tannenbaum & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2000 “Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.” Memory & Cognition 28(8): 1277–1288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, Florian
2007 “The development of english each other: grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both?” English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection.” The View from Building 2.0, ed. by Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2009 “Compounding in Distributed Morphology.” Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. by Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Stekauer, 129–144. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
1999 “State-of-the-Article: Disttributed Morphology.” GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 “Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal?” What makes grammaticalization: a look from its fringes and its components, ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Benjamin Wieber, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1982 “From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology.” The structure of phonological representations (I), ed. by Harry van der Hulst & Neil Smith. Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Longtin, Catherine-Marie, Juan Segui & Pierre A. Halle
2003 “Morphological priming without morphological relationship.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18(3): 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
2014 “Derivational affixes as roots: Phasal spell-out meet English stress shift.” The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer, 230–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older
1994 “Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.” Psychological Review 101(2): 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, Kathleen, Matt H. Davis, William D. Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine K. Tyler
2000 “Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study.” Language and Cognitive Processes 4–51: 507–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1982 The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy
1974 “Topics in English Morphology.” PhD diss., MIT.
Smolka, Eva, Sarolta Komlosi & Frank Rösler
2009 “When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs.” Language and Cognitive Processes 24(3): 337–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2015 “Diminutive verbs in german. semantic analysis and theoretiical implications.” Morphology 25(2): 183–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Nina
2007 “Root merger in Chinese compounds.” Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar