Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2023
Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 2338
Acquaviva, Paolo
2009 “Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology.” York-Essex Morphology Meeting, ed. by Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo, 1–21.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2014The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny, Geert E. Booij & Ray S. Jackendoff
2017 “Menschlen, kibbelen, sparkle. verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2020The Roots of Verbal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005The Normal Course of Events: Structuring Sense, vol. II1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boudelaa, Sami & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2004 “Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-skeleton in Arabic.” Cognition 92(3): 271–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combrink, Johan G. H.
1990Afrikaanse Morfologie. Capita Exemplaria. Pretoria: Academica.Google Scholar
Cavirani-Pots, Cora
2020 “Roots in progress. semi-lexicality in the Dutch and Afrikaans verbal domain.” PhD diss., LOT Dissertation series, Amsterdam.
Cavirani-Pots, Cora, Engela de Villiers & Dany Jaspers
2023 “More species in the affixal forest. the case of dutch and afrikaans -el and -er.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 139(1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conradie, Jac
2007 “The final stages of deflection: the case of afrikaans het ‘have’.” Historical Linguistics 2005. Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by J. Salmons & S. Dubenion-Smith, 207–221.Google Scholar
Creemers, Ava
2020 “Morphological processing and the effects of semantic transparency.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Creemers, Ava, Jan Don & Paula Fenger
2018 “Some affixes are roots, others are heads.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 361: 45–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, Marijke
2011 “Roots and affixes. Eliminating lexical categories from syntax.” PhD diss., UiL-OTS/Utrecht University/HUBrussel.
2017 “The root and nothing but the root: primary compounds in Dutch.” Syntax 20(2): 138–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen
1993Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: Sdu.Google Scholar
De Vos, Mark Andrew
2003 “Past participles in Afrikaans dialects and Dutch.” WCCFL 22 Proceedings ed. by G. Garding & M. Tsujimura, 519–532.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
2012Roots of Afrikaans. Selected writings of Hans den Besten. (Creole Language Library 44). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Feldman, Laurie Beth & Shlomo Bentin
1994 “Morphological analysis of diisrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Phychology 47(2): 407–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ram, Avital Deutsch, Orna Gilboa, Michal Tannenbaum & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2000 “Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.” Memory & Cognition 28(8): 1277–1288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, Florian
2007 “The development of english each other: grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both?English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection.” The View from Building 2.0, ed. by Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2009 “Compounding in Distributed Morphology.” Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. by Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Stekauer, 129–144. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer
1999 “State-of-the-Article: Disttributed Morphology.” GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 “Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal?What makes grammaticalization: a look from its fringes and its components, ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Benjamin Wieber, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1982 “From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology.” The structure of phonological representations (I), ed. by Harry van der Hulst & Neil Smith. Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Longtin, Catherine-Marie, Juan Segui & Pierre A. Halle
2003 “Morphological priming without morphological relationship.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18(3): 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
2014 “Derivational affixes as roots: Phasal spell-out meet English stress shift.” The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer, 230–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older
1994 “Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.” Psychological Review 101(2): 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, Kathleen, Matt H. Davis, William D. Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine K. Tyler
2000 “Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study.” Language and Cognitive Processes 4–51: 507–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1982The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy
1974 “Topics in English Morphology.” PhD diss., MIT.
Smolka, Eva, Sarolta Komlosi & Frank Rösler
2009 “When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs.” Language and Cognitive Processes 24(3): 337–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2015 “Diminutive verbs in german. semantic analysis and theoretiical implications.” Morphology 25(2): 183–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Nina
2007 “Root merger in Chinese compounds.” Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar